These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17725162)

  • 1. Reading aloud: when the effect of stimulus quality distinguishes between cascaded and thresholded components.
    Blais C; Besner D
    Exp Psychol; 2007; 54(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 17725162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reading aloud: On the determinants of the joint effects of stimulus quality and word frequency.
    White D; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 May; 43(5):749-756. PubMed ID: 27936847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modulation of regularity and lexicality effects in reading aloud.
    Kinoshita S; Lupker SJ; Rastle K
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Dec; 32(8):1255-64. PubMed ID: 15900919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reading nonwords aloud: results requiring change in the dual route cascaded model.
    Besner D; Roberts MA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Jun; 10(2):398-404. PubMed ID: 12921416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is the orthographic/phonological onset a single unit in reading aloud?
    Mousikou P; Coltheart M; Saunders S; Yen L
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Feb; 36(1):175-94. PubMed ID: 20121303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A dual-route cascaded model of reading by deaf adults: evidence for grapheme to viseme conversion.
    Elliott EA; Braun M; Kuhlmann M; Jacobs AM
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2012; 17(2):227-43. PubMed ID: 22159409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Zeading and reazing: which is faster? The position of the diverging letter in a pseudoword determines reading time.
    Mulatti C; Peressotti F; Job R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Jul; 60(7):1005-14. PubMed ID: 17616916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Additive and interactive effects of stimulus degradation: no challenge for CDP+.
    Ziegler JC; Perry C; Zorzi M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):306-11. PubMed ID: 19210104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the joint effects of stimulus quality, regularity, and lexicality when reading aloud: new challenges.
    Besner D; O'Malley S; Robidoux S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):750-64. PubMed ID: 20438270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neighbourhood density effects in reading aloud: new insights from simulations with the DRC model.
    Reynolds M; Besner D
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2002 Dec; 56(4):310-8. PubMed ID: 12491655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reading aloud: qualitative differences in the relation between stimulus quality and word frequency as a function of context.
    O'Malley S; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1400-11. PubMed ID: 18980404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neighbourhood density, word frequency, and spelling-sound regularity effects in naming: similarities and differences between skilled readers and the Dual Route Cascaded Computational model.
    Reynolds M; Besner D
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2004 Mar; 58(1):13-31. PubMed ID: 15072206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Switch costs when reading aloud words and nonwords: evidence for shifting route emphasis?
    Kinoshita S; Lupker SJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Jun; 14(3):449-54. PubMed ID: 17874586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reading aloud: does previous trial history modulate the joint effects of stimulus quality and word frequency?
    O'Malley S; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1321-5. PubMed ID: 23855551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. SD-squared revisited: reply to Coltheart, Tree, and Saunders (2010).
    Woollams AM; Lambon Ralph MA; Plaut DC; Patterson K
    Psychol Rev; 2010 Jan; 117(1):273-81; discussion 282-3. PubMed ID: 20063974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Controlling lexical contributions to the reading of pseudohomophones.
    Kwantes PJ; Marmurek HH
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Apr; 14(2):373-8. PubMed ID: 17694929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Qualitative differences between the joint effects of stimulus quality and word frequency in reading aloud and lexical decision: extensions to Yap and Balota (2007).
    O'Malley S; Reynolds MG; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):451-8. PubMed ID: 17352625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Beyond single syllables: large-scale modeling of reading aloud with the Connectionist Dual Process (CDP++) model.
    Perry C; Ziegler JC; Zorzi M
    Cogn Psychol; 2010 Sep; 61(2):106-51. PubMed ID: 20510406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reading aloud polysyllabic words and nonwords: the syllabic length effect reexamined.
    Ferrand L
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Mar; 7(1):142-8. PubMed ID: 10780028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The serial nature of the masked onset priming effect revisited.
    Mousikou P; Coltheart M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(11):2239-46. PubMed ID: 24853396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.