BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17725844)

  • 1. Power analysis for genome-wide association studies.
    Klein RJ
    BMC Genet; 2007 Aug; 8():58. PubMed ID: 17725844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing the power of tag SNPs in the mapping of quantitative trait loci (QTL) with extremal and random samples.
    Zhang K; Sun F
    BMC Genet; 2005 Oct; 6():51. PubMed ID: 16236175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Increasing power of genome-wide association studies by collecting additional single-nucleotide polymorphisms.
    Kostem E; Lozano JA; Eskin E
    Genetics; 2011 Jun; 188(2):449-60. PubMed ID: 21467568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selecting single-nucleotide polymorphisms for association studies with SNPbrowser software.
    De La Vega FM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 376():177-93. PubMed ID: 17984546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detailed analysis of the relative power of direct and indirect association studies and the implications for their interpretation.
    Moskvina V; O'Donovan MC
    Hum Hered; 2007; 64(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 17483598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Information capture using SNPs from HapMap and whole-genome chips differs in a sample of inflammatory and cardiovascular gene-centric regions from genome-wide estimates.
    Wallace C; Dobson RJ; Munroe PB; Caulfield MJ
    Genome Res; 2007 Nov; 17(11):1596-602. PubMed ID: 17895426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tag SNP selection for association studies.
    Stram DO
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 27(4):365-74. PubMed ID: 15372618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The power of genome-wide association studies of complex disease genes: statistical limitations of indirect approaches using SNP markers.
    Ohashi J; Tokunaga K
    J Hum Genet; 2001; 46(8):478-82. PubMed ID: 11501946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficient association study design via power-optimized tag SNP selection.
    Han B; Kang HM; Seo MS; Zaitlen N; Eskin E
    Ann Hum Genet; 2008 Nov; 72(Pt 6):834-47. PubMed ID: 18702637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficiency and power in genetic association studies.
    de Bakker PI; Yelensky R; Pe'er I; Gabriel SB; Daly MJ; Altshuler D
    Nat Genet; 2005 Nov; 37(11):1217-23. PubMed ID: 16244653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new model of multi-marker correlation for genome-wide tag SNP selection.
    Wang WB; Jiang T
    Genome Inform; 2008; 21():27-41. PubMed ID: 19425145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A tool for selecting SNPs for association studies based on observed linkage disequilibrium patterns.
    De La Vega FM; Isaac HI; Scafe CR
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2006; ():487-98. PubMed ID: 17094263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Design of tag SNP whole genome genotyping arrays.
    Peiffer DA; Gunderson KL
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 529():51-61. PubMed ID: 19381970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Selecting additional tag SNPs for tolerating missing data in genotyping.
    Huang YT; Zhang K; Chen T; Chao KM
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Nov; 6():263. PubMed ID: 16259642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of genome-wide power of genetic association studies based on empirical data from the HapMap project.
    Nannya Y; Taura K; Kurokawa M; Chiba S; Ogawa S
    Hum Mol Genet; 2007 Oct; 16(20):2494-505. PubMed ID: 17666406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genome-wide selection of tag SNPs using multiple-marker correlation.
    Hao K
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Dec; 23(23):3178-84. PubMed ID: 18006555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. SNPs in Multi-species Conserved Sequences (MCS) as useful markers in association studies: a practical approach.
    McCauley JL; Kenealy SJ; Margulies EH; Schnetz-Boutaud N; Gregory SG; Hauser SL; Oksenberg JR; Pericak-Vance MA; Haines JL; Mortlock DP
    BMC Genomics; 2007 Aug; 8():266. PubMed ID: 17683615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genome-wide SNP genotyping study using pooled DNA to identify candidate markers mediating susceptibility to end-stage renal disease attributed to Type 1 diabetes.
    Craig DW; Millis MP; DiStefano JK
    Diabet Med; 2009 Nov; 26(11):1090-8. PubMed ID: 19929986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multi-marker-LD based genetic algorithm for tag SNP selection.
    Mouawad AE; Mansour N
    Interdiscip Sci; 2014 Dec; 6(4):303-11. PubMed ID: 25108458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Incorporation of genetic model parameters for cost-effective designs of genetic association studies using DNA pooling.
    Ji F; Finch SJ; Haynes C; Mendell NR; Gordon D
    BMC Genomics; 2007 Jul; 8():238. PubMed ID: 17634103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.