These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17726553)

  • 1. The inadequacy of monitoring without modelling support.
    Jørgensen LF; Refsgaard JC; Højberg AL
    J Environ Monit; 2007 Sep; 9(9):931-42. PubMed ID: 17726553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Joint use of monitoring and modelling.
    Jørgensen LF; Refsgaard JC; Højberg AL
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(8):21-9. PubMed ID: 17978429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Coordinating links among research, standardisation and policy in support of water framework directive chemical monitoring requirements.
    Quevauviller P; Borchers U; Gawlik BM
    J Environ Monit; 2007 Sep; 9(9):915-23. PubMed ID: 17726551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The European Water Framework Directive at the age of 10: a critical review of the achievements with recommendations for the future.
    Hering D; Borja A; Carstensen J; Carvalho L; Elliott M; Feld CK; Heiskanen AS; Johnson RK; Moe J; Pont D; Solheim AL; de Bund Wv
    Sci Total Environ; 2010 Sep; 408(19):4007-19. PubMed ID: 20557924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Marine monitoring: Its shortcomings and mismatch with the EU Water Framework Directive's objectives.
    de Jonge VN; Elliott M; Brauer VS
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2006; 53(1-4):5-19. PubMed ID: 16426645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Science-policy interfacing in support of the Water Framework Directive implementation.
    Vaes G; Willems P; Swartenbroekx P; Kramer K; de Lange W; Kober K
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 19587401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Report on EU guidance on groundwater monitoring developed under the common implementation strategy of the water framework directive.
    Grath J; Ward R; Scheidleder A; Quevauviller P
    J Environ Monit; 2007 Nov; 9(11):1162-75. PubMed ID: 17968442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Design of a new monitoring network and first testing of new biological assessment methods according to water framework directive.
    Sommerhäuser M; Scharner C; Schimmer H; Schindler A; Plantikow K; Vietoris F
    J Environ Monit; 2007 Sep; 9(9):966-9. PubMed ID: 17726557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of short-chain chlorinated paraffins: a discussion paper.
    Pellizzato F; Ricci M; Held A; Emons H
    J Environ Monit; 2007 Sep; 9(9):924-30. PubMed ID: 17726552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ag-PIE: a GIS-based screening model for assessing agricultural pressures and impacts on water quality on a European scale.
    Giupponi C; Vladimirova I
    Sci Total Environ; 2006 Apr; 359(1-3):57-75. PubMed ID: 16181658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adaptive coastal planning and the European Union's water framework directive: a Swedish perspective.
    Gipperth L; Elmgren R
    Ambio; 2005 Mar; 34(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 15865314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Participatory dam systems modelling: a case study of the transboundary Guadiana River in the Iberian Peninsula.
    Máñez M; Froebrich J; Ferrand N; Silva A
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(4):145-56. PubMed ID: 17851215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of benthic indicators in Europe: from the Water Framework Directive to the Marine Strategy Framework Directive.
    Van Hoey G; Borja A; Birchenough S; Buhl-Mortensen L; Degraer S; Fleischer D; Kerckhof F; Magni P; Muxika I; Reiss H; Schröder A; Zettler ML
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2010 Dec; 60(12):2187-96. PubMed ID: 21051051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What does 'good ecological potential' mean, within the European Water Framework Directive?
    Borja A; Elliott M
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2007 Oct; 54(10):1559-64. PubMed ID: 17903563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Toward a holistic and risk-based management of European river basins.
    Brack W; Apitz SE; Borchardt D; Brils J; Cardoso AC; Foekema EM; van Gils J; Jansen S; Harris B; Hein M; Heise S; Hellsten S; de Maagd PG; Müller D; Panov VE; Posthuma L; Quevauviller P; Verdonschot PF; von der Ohe PC
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2009 Jan; 5(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 19132820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identification of significant pressures and impacts upon receiving waters.
    Borchardt D; Richter S
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(10):33-8. PubMed ID: 15137150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Statistical principles for ecological status classification of Water Framework Directive monitoring data.
    Carstensen J
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2007; 55(1-6):3-15. PubMed ID: 16997328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Toward an integrated assessment of the ecological and chemical status of European river basins.
    von der Ohe PC; De Deckere E; Prüss A; Muñoz I; Wolfram G; Villagrasa M; Ginebreda A; Hein M; Brack W
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2009 Jan; 5(1):50-61. PubMed ID: 19132821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of numerical models for determination of best sampling locations for monitoring of large lakes.
    Dabrowski T; Berry A
    Sci Total Environ; 2009 Jul; 407(14):4207-19. PubMed ID: 19406455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Copper and zinc water quality standards under the EU Water Framework Directive: the use of a tiered approach to estimate the levels of failure.
    Comber SD; Merrington G; Sturdy L; Delbeke K; van Assche F
    Sci Total Environ; 2008 Sep; 403(1-3):12-22. PubMed ID: 18599110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.