730 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17728317)
1. Small-sample estimation of negative binomial dispersion, with applications to SAGE data.
Robinson MD; Smyth GK
Biostatistics; 2008 Apr; 9(2):321-32. PubMed ID: 17728317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bias-corrected maximum likelihood estimator of the negative binomial dispersion parameter.
Saha K; Paul S
Biometrics; 2005 Mar; 61(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 15737091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bias-corrected maximum likelihood estimator of the intraclass correlation parameter for binary data.
Saha KK; Paul SR
Stat Med; 2005 Nov; 24(22):3497-512. PubMed ID: 16007569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Statistical evaluation of SAGE libraries: consequences for experimental design.
Ruijter JM; Van Kampen AH; Baas F
Physiol Genomics; 2002 Oct; 11(2):37-44. PubMed ID: 12407185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modeling motor vehicle crashes using Poisson-gamma models: examining the effects of low sample mean values and small sample size on the estimation of the fixed dispersion parameter.
Lord D
Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Jul; 38(4):751-66. PubMed ID: 16545328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Maximum likelihood estimation for the negative binomial dispersion parameter.
Piegorsch WW
Biometrics; 1990 Sep; 46(3):863-7. PubMed ID: 2242417
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Variance estimation in clinical studies with interim sample size re-estimation.
Miller F
Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):355-61. PubMed ID: 16011681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Methods of estimation in log odds ratio regression models.
Breslow NE; Cologne J
Biometrics; 1986 Dec; 42(4):949-54. PubMed ID: 3814734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Chain binomial models and binomial autoregressive processes.
Weiss CH; Pollett PK
Biometrics; 2012 Sep; 68(3):815-24. PubMed ID: 22150721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On tests of rate ratio under standard inverse sampling.
Tang ML; Liao YJ; Ng HK
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Mar; 89(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 18164512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Weighted nonparametric maximum likelihood estimate of a mixing distribution in nonrandomized clinical trials.
Liu C; Xie J; Zhang Y
Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(29):5303-19. PubMed ID: 17497612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Order-restricted tests for stratified comparisons of binomial proportions.
Agresti A; Coull BA
Biometrics; 1996 Sep; 52(3):1103-11. PubMed ID: 8805770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Small-sample confidence sets for the MTD in a phase I clinical trial.
Storer BE
Biometrics; 1993 Dec; 49(4):1117-25. PubMed ID: 8117905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. On the estimation of the binomial probability in multistage clinical trials.
Jung SH; Kim KM
Stat Med; 2004 Mar; 23(6):881-96. PubMed ID: 15027078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modeling and analysis of multi-library, multi-group SAGE data with application to a study of mouse cerebellum.
Wang Z; Lin S; Popesco M; Rotter A
Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):777-86. PubMed ID: 17825009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Moderated statistical tests for assessing differences in tag abundance.
Robinson MD; Smyth GK
Bioinformatics; 2007 Nov; 23(21):2881-7. PubMed ID: 17881408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative transcriptome analysis of in vivo- and in vitro-produced porcine blastocysts by small amplified RNA-serial analysis of gene expression (SAR-SAGE).
Miles JR; Blomberg LA; Krisher RL; Everts RE; Sonstegard TS; Van Tassell CP; Zuelke KA
Mol Reprod Dev; 2008 Jun; 75(6):976-88. PubMed ID: 18357560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Small-sample performance of the robust score test and its modifications in generalized estimating equations.
Guo X; Pan W; Connett JE; Hannan PJ; French SA
Stat Med; 2005 Nov; 24(22):3479-95. PubMed ID: 15977302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robust estimation of multivariate covariance components.
Dueck A; Lohr S
Biometrics; 2005 Mar; 61(1):162-9. PubMed ID: 15737089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An enhanced quantile approach for assessing differential gene expressions.
Wang H; He X
Biometrics; 2008 Jun; 64(2):449-57. PubMed ID: 18325069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
