157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17728685)
1. Developing outcome measures for pediatric deformity surgery.
Richards BS; Sanders JO
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Sep; 32(19 Suppl):S73-80. PubMed ID: 17728685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Outcome assessment in lumbar spine surgery.
Zanoli G
Acta Orthop Suppl; 2005 Jun; 76(318):5-47. PubMed ID: 16175972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The reliability and concurrent validity of the Scoliosis Research Society-22r patient questionnaire compared with the Child Health Questionnaire-CF87 patient questionnaire for adolescent spinal deformity.
Glattes RC; Burton DC; Lai SM; Frasier E; Asher MA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jul; 32(16):1778-84. PubMed ID: 17632399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of perioperative complications on clinical outcome in adult deformity surgery.
Glassman SD; Hamill CL; Bridwell KH; Schwab FJ; Dimar JR; Lowe TG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Nov; 32(24):2764-70. PubMed ID: 18007258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The problems and limitations of applying evidence-based medicine to primary surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity.
Bridwell KH; Berven S; Edwards C; Glassman S; Hamill C; Schwab F
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Sep; 32(19 Suppl):S135-9. PubMed ID: 17728681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dissecting the effects of spinal fusion and deformity magnitude on quality of life in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Tsutsui S; Pawelek J; Bastrom T; Lenke L; Lowe T; Betz R; Clements D; Newton PO
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Aug; 34(18):E653-8. PubMed ID: 19680091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing the quality of healthcare provided to children.
Mangione-Smith R; McGlynn EA
Health Serv Res; 1998 Oct; 33(4 Pt 2):1059-90. PubMed ID: 9776949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A novel mathematical model of the sagittal spine: application to pedicle subtraction osteotomy for correction of fixed sagittal deformity.
Yang BP; Chen LA; Ondra SL
Spine J; 2008; 8(2):359-66. PubMed ID: 17697800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Do 1-year outcomes predict 2-year outcomes for adult deformity surgery?
Glassman SD; Schwab F; Bridwell KH; Shaffrey C; Horton W; Hu S
Spine J; 2009 Apr; 9(4):317-22. PubMed ID: 18774752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is the SRS-22 instrument responsive to change in adult scoliosis patients having primary spinal deformity surgery?
Bridwell KH; Berven S; Glassman S; Hamill C; Horton WC; Lenke LG; Schwab F; Baldus C; Shainline M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Sep; 32(20):2220-5. PubMed ID: 17873814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Spine deformities in rare congenital syndromes: clinical issues.
Campbell RM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Aug; 34(17):1815-27. PubMed ID: 19644333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measuring outcomes in spinal deformity.
Burton DC; Glattes RC
Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2007 Apr; 18(2):403-5. PubMed ID: 17556143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. What impact does spinal deformity correction for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis make on quality of life?
Danielsson AJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Sep; 32(19 Suppl):S101-8. PubMed ID: 17728675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Revision rates following primary adult spinal deformity surgery: six hundred forty-three consecutive patients followed-up to twenty-two years postoperative.
Pichelmann MA; Lenke LG; Bridwell KH; Good CR; O'Leary PT; Sides BA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jan; 35(2):219-26. PubMed ID: 20038867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The morbidity of an anterior thoracolumbar approach: adult spinal deformity patients with greater than five-year follow-up.
Kim YB; Lenke LG; Kim YJ; Kim YW; Blanke K; Stobbs G; Bridwell KH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(8):822-6. PubMed ID: 19365252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pedicle screw instrumentation for adult idiopathic scoliosis: an improvement over hook/hybrid fixation.
Rose PS; Lenke LG; Bridwell KH; Mulconrey DS; Cronen GA; Buchowski JM; Schwend RM; Sides BA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(8):852-7; discussion 858. PubMed ID: 19365256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Safety and efficacy of posterior instrumentation for patients with congenital scoliosis and spinal dysraphism.
Ayvaz M; Alanay A; Yazici M; Acaroglu E; Akalan N; Aksoy C
J Pediatr Orthop; 2007 Jun; 27(4):380-6. PubMed ID: 17513956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Anterior exposures of the pediatric spine and posterior pedicle screw instrumentation.
Hedequist D; Emans J
Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2007 Oct; 18(4):681-95. PubMed ID: 17991591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Surgical treatment for disorders of the cervicothoracic junction region].
Stulík J; Vyskocil T; Sebesta P; Kryl J; Pafko P
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2005; 72(4):213-20. PubMed ID: 16194439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
