These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17729153)

  • 41. Hand dominance influences the processing of observed bodies.
    Gardner MR; Potts R
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Jun; 73(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 20338681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Left minineglect or inverse pseudoneglect in children with dyslexia?
    Michel C; Bidot S; Bonnetblanc F; Quercia P
    Neuroreport; 2011 Jan; 22(2):93-6. PubMed ID: 21164370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The effects of movement direction and hemispace on estimates of distance traveled.
    Foster PS; Crucian GP; Drago V; Burks DW; Mielke J; Shenal BV; Rhodes RD; Grande LJ; Womack K; Riesta A; Heilman KM
    Brain Cogn; 2007 Jul; 64(2):184-8. PubMed ID: 17395351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Random number generation in neglect patients reveals enhanced response stereotypy, but no neglect in number space.
    Loetscher T; Brugger P
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan; 47(1):276-9. PubMed ID: 18771676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Dopaminergic genotype biases spatial attention in healthy children.
    Bellgrove MA; Chambers CD; Johnson KA; Daibhis A; Daly M; Hawi Z; Lambert D; Gill M; Robertson IH
    Mol Psychiatry; 2007 Aug; 12(8):786-92. PubMed ID: 17549062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Spatial attention: differential shifts in pseudoneglect direction with time-on-task and initial bias support the idea of observer subtypes.
    Benwell CS; Thut G; Learmonth G; Harvey M
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Nov; 51(13):2747-56. PubMed ID: 24076376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Lost in the middle. Attentional modulation of the pseudoneglect phenomenon in a "no hands" line bisection paradigm.
    Lavanchy L; Mayer E; Hauert CA
    Cortex; 2004 Feb; 40(1):181-2. PubMed ID: 15174463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Direction specific costs to spatial working memory from saccadic and spatial remapping.
    Vasquez B; Danckert J
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(9):2344-54. PubMed ID: 18440036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Leftward motion restores number space in neglect.
    Salillas E; Granà A; Juncadella M; Rico I; Semenza C
    Cortex; 2009 Jun; 45(6):730-7. PubMed ID: 19111292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Interlateral asymmetry in the time course of the effect of a peripheral prime stimulus.
    Castro-Barros BA; Righi LL; Grechi G; Ribeiro-do-Valle LE
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Apr; 66(3):265-79. PubMed ID: 17961895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Right hemisphere dominance for auditory attention and its modulation by eye position: an event related fMRI study.
    Petit L; Simon G; Joliot M; Andersson F; Bertin T; Zago L; Mellet E; Tzourio-Mazoyer N
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2007; 25(3-4):211-25. PubMed ID: 17943000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Effects of allocation of visuo-spatial attention to visual stimuli triggering unilateral arm abduction on anticipatory postural control.
    Tomita H; Fujiwara K
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Sep; 119(9):2086-97. PubMed ID: 18620907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Mental representation of space: insights from an oblique distribution of hallucinations.
    Girard TA; Martius DL; Cheyne JA
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(6):1257-69. PubMed ID: 17113114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Directional collisions during a route-following task.
    Thomas NA; Stuckel D; Gutwin C; Elias LJ
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2009 Mar; 15(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 19203435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Evidence for a common mechanism of spatial attention and visual awareness: Towards construct validity of pseudoneglect.
    Chen J; Kaur J; Abbas H; Wu M; Luo W; Osman S; Niemeier M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0212998. PubMed ID: 30845258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Visuospatial biases in preschool children: Evidence from line bisection in three-dimensional space.
    Patro K; Nuerk HC; Brugger P
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Sep; 173():16-27. PubMed ID: 29649699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The Influence of Focused and Sustained Spatial Attention on the Allocation of Spatial Attention.
    Lamb DG; Balavage KT; Williamson JB; Knight LA; Heilman KM
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2019 Jan; 25(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 30486914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Spatial-attention and emotional evocation: line bisection performance and visual art emotional evocation.
    Drago V; Finney GR; Foster PS; Amengual A; Jeong Y; Mizuno T; Crucian GP; Heilman KM
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Mar; 66(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 17681657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Is there continuity between categorical and coordinate spatial relations coding? Evidence from a grid/no-grid working memory paradigm.
    Martin R; Houssemand C; Schiltz C; Burnod Y; Alexandre F
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Jan; 46(2):576-94. PubMed ID: 18037455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Rightward bisection errors for letter lines: the role of semantic information.
    Mohr C; Leonards U
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Jan; 45(2):295-304. PubMed ID: 16945395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.