These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17737619)

  • 21. Impact of earthquakes on risk for pulmonary embolism.
    Watanabe H; Kodama M; Tanabe N; Nakamura Y; Nagai T; Sato M; Okabe M; Aizawa Y
    Int J Cardiol; 2008 Sep; 129(1):152-4. PubMed ID: 17651831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Real-time forecasts of tomorrow's earthquakes in California.
    Gerstenberger MC; Wiemer S; Jones LM; Reasenberg PA
    Nature; 2005 May; 435(7040):328-31. PubMed ID: 15902254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A probabilistic neural network for earthquake magnitude prediction.
    Adeli H; Panakkat A
    Neural Netw; 2009 Sep; 22(7):1018-24. PubMed ID: 19502005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Acute pulmonary embolism after an earthquake in Japan.
    Sakuma M; Nakamura M; Hanzawa K; Kobayashi T; Kuroiwa M; Nakanishi N; Miyahara Y; Tanabe N; Yamada N; Kuriyama T; Kunieda T; Sugimoto T; Nakano T; Shirato K
    Semin Thromb Hemost; 2006 Nov; 32(8):856-60. PubMed ID: 17171600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Future plans for mental health care following the Great Earthquake of Eastern Japan--a legislative viewpoint].
    Nakatani Y
    Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2012; 114(3):241-2. PubMed ID: 22701917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Seismic hazard in the Marmara Sea region following the 17 August 1999 Izmit earthquake.
    Hubert-Ferrari A; Barka A; Jacques E; Nalbant SS; Meyer B; Armijo R; Tapponnier P; King GC
    Nature; 2000 Mar; 404(6775):269-73. PubMed ID: 10749206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Increased acute myocardial infarction mortality following the 1995 Great Hanshin-Awaji earthquake in Japan.
    Ogawa K; Tsuji I; Shiono K; Hisamichi S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2000 Jun; 29(3):449-55. PubMed ID: 10869316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Kachchh (India) earthquake 2001--causes, severity and impact on groundwater resources.
    Khan MA; Sharma ML
    J Environ Sci (China); 2003 Jul; 15(4):500-5. PubMed ID: 12974311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Shaken, not stirred: a serendipitous study of ants and earthquakes.
    Lighton JR; Duncan FD
    J Exp Biol; 2005 Aug; 208(Pt 16):3103-7. PubMed ID: 16081608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Great Eastern Japan Earthquake--possible marine environmental contamination by toxic pollutants.
    Tanabe S; Subramanian A
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2011 May; 62(5):883-4. PubMed ID: 21549868
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Health impact of disaster-related stress on pregnant women living in the affected area of the Noto Peninsula earthquake in Japan.
    Hibino Y; Takaki J; Kambayashi Y; Hitomi Y; Sakai A; Sekizuka N; Ogino K; Nakamura H
    Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 2009 Feb; 63(1):107-15. PubMed ID: 19154216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Hurricane prediction and control: impact of large computers.
    Hammond AL
    Science; 1973 Aug; 181(4100):643-5. PubMed ID: 17736975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Earthquake hazards on the cascadia subduction zone.
    Heaton TH; Hartzell SH
    Science; 1987 Apr; 236(4798):162-8. PubMed ID: 17789780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Characteristics and treatment of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in patients with trauma in the Wenchuan earthquake on 12th May, 2008].
    Pu H; Jin XD; Deng YY; Kang Y; Xie XQ; Liao XL; Yang L; Wang L; Wang CZ
    Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2009 Jan; 21(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 19141187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Interaction of the san jacinto and san andreas fault zones, southern california: triggered earthquake migration and coupled recurrence intervals.
    Sanders CO
    Science; 1993 May; 260(5110):973-6. PubMed ID: 17818388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The parkfield, california, earthquake prediction experiment.
    Bakun WH; Lindh AG
    Science; 1985 Aug; 229(4714):619-24. PubMed ID: 17739363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Earthquake disasters--lessons to be learned.
    Peleg K; Reuveni H; Stein M
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2002 May; 4(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 12040826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Implications for prediction and hazard assessment from the 2004 Parkfield earthquake.
    Bakun WH; Aagaard B; Dost B; Ellsworth WL; Hardebeck JL; Harris RA; Ji C; Johnston MJ; Langbein J; Lienkaemper JJ; Michael AJ; Murray JR; Nadeau RM; Reasenberg PA; Reichle MS; Roeloffs EA; Shakal A; Simpson RW; Waldhauser F
    Nature; 2005 Oct; 437(7061):969-74. PubMed ID: 16222291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Selectivity of seismic electric signal (SES) of the 2000 Izu earthquake swarm: a 3D FEM numerical simulation model.
    Huang Q; Lin Y
    Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci; 2010; 86(3):257-64. PubMed ID: 20228625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The loma prieta, california, earthquake: an anticipated event.
    U.S. Geological Survey Staff
    Science; 1990 Jan; 247(4940):286-93. PubMed ID: 17735847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.