144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1774390)
1. Bioimpedance versus thermodilution cardiac output measurement: the Bomed NCCOM3 after coronary bypass surgery.
Thomas AN; Ryan J; Doran BR; Pollard BJ
Intensive Care Med; 1991; 17(7):383-6. PubMed ID: 1774390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Thoracic electrical bioimpedance measurement of cardiac output in postaortocoronary bypass patients.
Sageman WS; Amundson DE
Crit Care Med; 1993 Aug; 21(8):1139-42. PubMed ID: 8339577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cardiac output can be reliably measured noninvasively after coronary artery bypass grafting operation.
Kööbi T; Kaukinen S; Turjanmaa VM
Crit Care Med; 1999 Oct; 27(10):2206-11. PubMed ID: 10548208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of hemodynamic parameters derived from transthoracic electrical bioimpedance with those parameters obtained by thermodilution and ventricular angiography.
Marik PE; Pendelton JE; Smith R
Crit Care Med; 1997 Sep; 25(9):1545-50. PubMed ID: 9295830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cardiac output measurement after coronary artery bypass grafting using bolus thermodilution, continuous thermodilution, and whole-body impedance cardiography.
Kaukinen S; Kööbi T; Bi Y; Turjanmaa VM
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2003 Apr; 17(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 12698402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of the BoMED NCCOM3 bioimpedance cardiac output monitor during induced hypotension: an experimental study in dogs.
Tibballs J; Hochmann M; Osborne A; Carter B
Anaesth Intensive Care; 1992 Aug; 20(3):326-31. PubMed ID: 1524173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cardiac output determination from endotracheally measured impedance cardiography: clinical evaluation of endotracheal cardiac output monitor.
Maus TM; Reber B; Banks DA; Berry A; Guerrero E; Manecke GR
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2011 Oct; 25(5):770-5. PubMed ID: 21354828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical evaluation of a new tracheal impedance cardiography method.
van der Kleij SC; Koolen BB; Newhall DA; Gerritse BM; Rosseel PM; Rijpstra TA; Geisler FE; van der Meer NJ
Anaesthesia; 2012 Jul; 67(7):729-33. PubMed ID: 22420758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of impedance cardiography: comparison of NCCOM3-R7 with Fick and thermodilution methods.
Yakimets J; Jensen L
Heart Lung; 1995; 24(3):194-206. PubMed ID: 7622393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cardiac output measurements with electrical velocimetry in patients undergoing CABG surgery: a comparison with intermittent thermodilution.
Mekis D; Kamenik M; Starc V; Jeretin S
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2008 Mar; 25(3):237-42. PubMed ID: 17850685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Cardiac output monitoring by impedance cardiography in cardiac surgery].
Shimizu H; Seki S; Mizuguchi A; Tsuchida H; Watanabe H; Namiki A
Masui; 1990 Apr; 39(4):508-12. PubMed ID: 2362347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Esophageal electrodes allow precise assessment of cardiac output by bioimpedance.
Balestra B; Malacrida R; Leonardi L; Suter P; Marone C
Crit Care Med; 1992 Jan; 20(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 1729048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Equivalence of bioimpedance and thermodilution in measuring cardiac index after cardiac surgery.
Sageman WS; Riffenburgh RH; Spiess BD
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2002 Feb; 16(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 11854871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Whole-body impedance cardiography in the measurement of cardiac output.
Kööbi T; Kaukinen S; Turjanmaa VM; Uusitalo AJ
Crit Care Med; 1997 May; 25(5):779-85. PubMed ID: 9187596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Determination of cardiac output during positive end-expiratory pressure--noninvasive electrical bioimpedance compared with standard thermodilution.
Castor G; Molter G; Helms J; Niedermark I; Altmayer P
Crit Care Med; 1990 May; 18(5):544-6. PubMed ID: 2183967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intraoperative cardiac output monitoring: comparison of impedance cardiography and thermodilution.
Perrino AC; Lippman A; Ariyan C; O'Connor TZ; Luther M
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 1994 Feb; 8(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 8167281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of transthoracic electrical bioimpedance cardiac output measurement with thermodilution method in post coronary artery bypass graft patients.
Sharma V; Singh A; Kansara B; Karlekar A
Ann Card Anaesth; 2011; 14(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 21636930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of lung injury and excessive lung fluid, on impedance cardiac output measurements, in the critically ill.
Critchley LA; Calcroft RM; Tan PY; Kew J; Critchley JA
Intensive Care Med; 2000 Jun; 26(6):679-85. PubMed ID: 10945383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Non-invasive measurement of cardiac output: whole-body impedance cardiography in simultaneous comparison with thermodilution and direct oxygen Fick methods.
Kööbi T; Kaukinen S; Ahola T; Turjanmaa VM
Intensive Care Med; 1997 Nov; 23(11):1132-7. PubMed ID: 9434918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Noninvasive assessment of cardiac output using thoracic electrical bioimpedance in hemodynamically stable and unstable patients after cardiac surgery: a comparison with pulmonary artery thermodilution.
Suttner S; Schöllhorn T; Boldt J; Mayer J; Röhm KD; Lang K; Piper SN
Intensive Care Med; 2006 Dec; 32(12):2053-8. PubMed ID: 17039348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
