These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1774390)
1. Bioimpedance versus thermodilution cardiac output measurement: the Bomed NCCOM3 after coronary bypass surgery. Thomas AN; Ryan J; Doran BR; Pollard BJ Intensive Care Med; 1991; 17(7):383-6. PubMed ID: 1774390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Thoracic electrical bioimpedance measurement of cardiac output in postaortocoronary bypass patients. Sageman WS; Amundson DE Crit Care Med; 1993 Aug; 21(8):1139-42. PubMed ID: 8339577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cardiac output can be reliably measured noninvasively after coronary artery bypass grafting operation. Kööbi T; Kaukinen S; Turjanmaa VM Crit Care Med; 1999 Oct; 27(10):2206-11. PubMed ID: 10548208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of hemodynamic parameters derived from transthoracic electrical bioimpedance with those parameters obtained by thermodilution and ventricular angiography. Marik PE; Pendelton JE; Smith R Crit Care Med; 1997 Sep; 25(9):1545-50. PubMed ID: 9295830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cardiac output measurement after coronary artery bypass grafting using bolus thermodilution, continuous thermodilution, and whole-body impedance cardiography. Kaukinen S; Kööbi T; Bi Y; Turjanmaa VM J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2003 Apr; 17(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 12698402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of the BoMED NCCOM3 bioimpedance cardiac output monitor during induced hypotension: an experimental study in dogs. Tibballs J; Hochmann M; Osborne A; Carter B Anaesth Intensive Care; 1992 Aug; 20(3):326-31. PubMed ID: 1524173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical evaluation of a new tracheal impedance cardiography method. van der Kleij SC; Koolen BB; Newhall DA; Gerritse BM; Rosseel PM; Rijpstra TA; Geisler FE; van der Meer NJ Anaesthesia; 2012 Jul; 67(7):729-33. PubMed ID: 22420758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of impedance cardiography: comparison of NCCOM3-R7 with Fick and thermodilution methods. Yakimets J; Jensen L Heart Lung; 1995; 24(3):194-206. PubMed ID: 7622393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cardiac output measurements with electrical velocimetry in patients undergoing CABG surgery: a comparison with intermittent thermodilution. Mekis D; Kamenik M; Starc V; Jeretin S Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2008 Mar; 25(3):237-42. PubMed ID: 17850685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of transthoracic electrical bioimpedance cardiac output measurement with thermodilution method in post coronary artery bypass graft patients. Sharma V; Singh A; Kansara B; Karlekar A Ann Card Anaesth; 2011; 14(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 21636930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of lung injury and excessive lung fluid, on impedance cardiac output measurements, in the critically ill. Critchley LA; Calcroft RM; Tan PY; Kew J; Critchley JA Intensive Care Med; 2000 Jun; 26(6):679-85. PubMed ID: 10945383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Non-invasive measurement of cardiac output: whole-body impedance cardiography in simultaneous comparison with thermodilution and direct oxygen Fick methods. Kööbi T; Kaukinen S; Ahola T; Turjanmaa VM Intensive Care Med; 1997 Nov; 23(11):1132-7. PubMed ID: 9434918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Noninvasive assessment of cardiac output using thoracic electrical bioimpedance in hemodynamically stable and unstable patients after cardiac surgery: a comparison with pulmonary artery thermodilution. Suttner S; Schöllhorn T; Boldt J; Mayer J; Röhm KD; Lang K; Piper SN Intensive Care Med; 2006 Dec; 32(12):2053-8. PubMed ID: 17039348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]