These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1774680)

  • 1. Adhesive properties of several impression material systems: Part I.
    Chai JY; Jameson LM; Moser JB; Hesby RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Aug; 66(2):201-9. PubMed ID: 1774680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adhesive properties of several impression material systems: Part II.
    Chai JY; Jameson LM; Moser JB; Hesby RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Sep; 66(3):287-92. PubMed ID: 1800721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of disinfection of custom tray materials on adhesive properties of several impression material systems.
    Thompson GA; Vermilyea SG; Agar JR
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Dec; 72(6):651-6. PubMed ID: 7853264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of tray material and surface condition on the shear bond strength of impression materials.
    Wang RR; Nguyen T; Boyle AM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Nov; 74(5):449-54. PubMed ID: 8809248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bond strength of three nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials to a light-activated resin tray.
    Payne JA; Pereira BP
    Int J Prosthodont; 1992; 5(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 1520444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adhesion of elastomeric impression materials to trays.
    Bindra B; Heath JR
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Jan; 24(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 9049922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of conventional and experimental gingival retraction solutions on the tensile strength and inhibition of polymerization of four types of impression materials.
    Sábio S; Franciscone PA; Mondelli J
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2008; 16(4):280-5. PubMed ID: 19089261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of custom tray material type and fabrication technique on tensile bond strength of impression material adhesive systems.
    Abdullah MA; Talic YF
    J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Mar; 30(3):312-7. PubMed ID: 12588506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of custom tray material type and surface treatment on the tensile bond strength of an impression material/adhesive system.
    Dixon DL; Breeding LC; Bosser MJ; Nafso AJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(3):303-6. PubMed ID: 8397701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Changes in properties of nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials after storage of components.
    Hondrum SO
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jan; 85(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 11174682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bond strength of two nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials bonded to two thermoplastic resin tray materials.
    Payne JA; Pereira BP
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Dec; 74(6):563-8. PubMed ID: 8778378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tear and energy properties of three impression materials.
    Hondrum SO
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(6):517-21. PubMed ID: 7748444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of custom tray material type and adhesive drying time on the tensile bond strength of an impression material/adhesive system.
    Dixon DL; Breeding LC; Brown JS
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 8003192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tensile bond strength of polyvinyl siloxane impressions bonded to a custom tray as a function of drying time: Part I.
    Cho GC; Donovan TE; Chee WW; White SN
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 May; 73(5):419-23. PubMed ID: 7658389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gingival sulcus simulation model for evaluating the penetration characteristics of elastomeric impression materials.
    Aimjirakul P; Masuda T; Takahashi H; Miura H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):385-9. PubMed ID: 12956493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative elasticity tests for elastomeric (non putty) impression materials.
    Blomberg PA; Mahmood S; Smales RJ; Makinson OF
    Aust Dent J; 1992 Oct; 37(5):346-52. PubMed ID: 1444955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of selected variables on the retention of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material.
    Al-Athel MS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):57-64. PubMed ID: 18784860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Some parameters for testing deformation of elastomeric impression materials.
    Blomberg PA; Mahmood S; Smales RJ; Makinson OF
    Aust Dent J; 1992 Aug; 37(4):271-6. PubMed ID: 1444946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficacy of tray adhesives for the adhesion of elastomer rubber impression materials to impression modeling plastics for border molding.
    Nishigawa G; Sato T; Suenaga K; Minagi S
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Feb; 79(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 9513098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of strain rate on the behavior of elastomeric impression.
    Klooster J; Logan GI; Tjan AH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Sep; 66(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 1800722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.