These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1774694)

  • 21. The influence of implant placement depth and impression material on the stability of an open tray impression coping.
    Linkevicius T; Svediene O; Vindasiute E; Puisys A; Linkeviciene L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Oct; 108(4):238-43. PubMed ID: 23031730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of five brands of latex gloves on the setting time of polyvinyl siloxane putty impression materials.
    Ravikumar CM; Sangur R
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):209-12. PubMed ID: 22945711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Use of polyvinyl siloxane material for an altered cast impression tray.
    Hsu YT
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):695-6. PubMed ID: 24657176
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An evaluation of the fit of metal-ceramic restorations made with an autoclaved silicone-based impression material.
    Kollefrath R; Savary M; Schwela J
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Jul; 11(4):E063-70. PubMed ID: 20953566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Influence of autoclave sterilization on dimensional stability and detail reproduction of 5 additional silicone impression materials].
    Xu TK; Sun ZH; Jiang Y
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Mar; 47(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 22800674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Issues in handling impression materials.
    Giordano R
    Gen Dent; 2000; 48(6):646-8. PubMed ID: 12004656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Predictable definitive impressions for multiple indirect restorations using a modified putty and wash impression procedure.
    Leong EW; Cheng AC; Khin NT; Lee H; Leong DJ
    Singapore Dent J; 2007 Dec; 29(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 18472530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of the setting stage on the accuracy of double-mix impressions made with addition-curing silicone.
    Takahashi H; Finger WJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Jul; 72(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 8083842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Indirect inhibition of polymerization of a polyvinyl siloxane impression material: a case report.
    Chee WW; Donovan TE; Kahn RL
    Quintessence Int; 1991 Feb; 22(2):133-5. PubMed ID: 2068247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Gingival sulcus simulation model for evaluating the penetration characteristics of elastomeric impression materials.
    Aimjirakul P; Masuda T; Takahashi H; Miura H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):385-9. PubMed ID: 12956493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of sulfur-based hemostatic agents and gingival retraction cords handled with latex gloves on the polymerization of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.
    Machado CE; Guedes CG
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2011; 19(6):628-33. PubMed ID: 22230998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Accuracy of one-step versus two-step putty wash addition silicone impression technique.
    Hung SH; Purk JH; Tira DE; Eick JD
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 May; 67(5):583-9. PubMed ID: 1527737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dentin surface reproduction with hydrophilic and hydrophobic impression materials.
    Takahashi H; Finger WJ
    Dent Mater; 1991 Jul; 7(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 1813343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The wetting of surface-treated silicone impression materials by gypsum mixes containing disinfectants and modifiers.
    Abdelaziz KM; Combe EC; Hodges JS
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Jun; 14(2):104-9. PubMed ID: 16011621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Dimensional changes in stone models simulating full crown preparations with adjacent teeth resulting from long-term immersion of medium-viscosity addition-type silicone rubber impressions in disinfectant solutions.
    Hiraguchi H; Iwasaki Y; Iwasaki E; Kikuchi H; Hirose H; Yoneyama T
    Dent Mater J; 2015; 34(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 25748458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An in vivo investigation of seating and removal forces associated with recording impressions in dentate patients.
    Sotiriou M; Hobkirk JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Nov; 74(5):455-62. PubMed ID: 8809249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of conventional and experimental gingival retraction solutions on the tensile strength and inhibition of polymerization of four types of impression materials.
    Sábio S; Franciscone PA; Mondelli J
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2008; 16(4):280-5. PubMed ID: 19089261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Surface Detail Reproduction and Effect of Disinfectant and Long-Term Storage on the Dimensional Stability of a Novel Vinyl Polyether Silicone Impression Material.
    Nassar U; Chow AK
    J Prosthodont; 2015 Aug; 24(6):494-8. PubMed ID: 25522249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Inhibition of polymerization of polyvinyl siloxanes by medicaments used on gingival retraction cords.
    de Camargo LM; Chee WW; Donovan TE
    J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Aug; 70(2):114-7. PubMed ID: 8371173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The impression process: part II--application.
    Terry DA
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2006; 18(10):636, 638, 640. PubMed ID: 17283694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.