105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1774936)
21. Evaluation of a surgical second opinion program.
Schachter M; Oppenheimer G; Cannoodt L; Sieverts S
QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1983 Jan; 9(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 6403901
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. An update on second surgical opinion programs.
Lance R; Haug JN
Bull Am Coll Surg; 1978 Dec; 63(12):26-34. PubMed ID: 10316749
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Mich. BC-BS gives workers second opinion coverage.
Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1977 May; 31(11):91. PubMed ID: 10316518
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The Blue Shield of New Jersey second surgical opinion program.
Cunniff CL
J Med Soc N J; 1983 Oct; 80(10):821-2. PubMed ID: 6580454
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Second opinion programs come into their own.
Friedman E
Hosp Med Staff; 1984 Aug; 13(8):9-14. PubMed ID: 10317499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Blues' second opinion plans growing but, so far, few are using option.
Natl Underwrit Life Health; 1978 Sep; 82(38):6-7. PubMed ID: 10316688
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Do second surgical opinion programs save?
Mod Healthc; 1979 Feb; 9(2):7. PubMed ID: 153465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Second opinion programs: continued savings from nonconfirmed surgeries.
Chu A; Lavoie V; McCarthy EG
Empl Benefits J; 1992 Sep; 17(3):35-40. PubMed ID: 10171221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Confirming diagnosis for elective surgery saved 2 NYC health and welfare funds $581,873.
Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1975 Feb; 29(8):30-1. PubMed ID: 10316866
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The second opinion at its best.
Fleming WH
Nebr Med J; 1978 Sep; 63(9):306-7. PubMed ID: 703896
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Going strong: second opinion campaign.
Forum (Wash); 1980 Aug; 4(3):42-3. PubMed ID: 7191397
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [A second opinion before elective operations].
Adar R
Harefuah; 1982 Jan; 102(2):82-3. PubMed ID: 7095636
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Second opinion: a tool to save money, improve care.
Hanley RJ; Ayers JT
Bus Health; 1985 Mar; 2(4):22-4. PubMed ID: 10317563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Programs prove effective second surgical opinion.
Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1984 Oct; 39(4):56, 60, 64. PubMed ID: 10317554
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Second surgical opinion programs: status report.
Conn Med; 1983 Jun; 47(6):363-5. PubMed ID: 6884019
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Second surgical opinion programs: evaluation deficiencies.
Dunham MH; Hunt VB
Wis Med J; 1984 Apr; 83(4):23-4. PubMed ID: 6428066
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Stop and listen to a second opinion.
Slayton A
Aging; 1979; (299-300):16-8. PubMed ID: 10316905
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The Federal Second Opinion Program in Connecticut.
Freedman JK
Conn Med; 1978 Dec; 42(12):810-1. PubMed ID: 720055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Second opinion programs: their potential for Medicaid.
Sheridan K
J Medicaid Manage; 1977; 1(4):9-16. PubMed ID: 10316830
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The sentinel effect in second opinion programs.
Martin SG
Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1982 Feb; 36(8):24, 26. PubMed ID: 10317179
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
