172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1775075)
1. Establishing mental retardation in capital cases: a potential matter of life and death.
Baroff GS
Ment Retard; 1991 Dec; 29(6):343-9. PubMed ID: 1775075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Misuse of the Street Survival Skills Questionnaire (SSSQ) for evaluating the adult adaptive behavior of criminal defendants with intellectual disability claims.
Denkowski GC; Denkowski KM
Intellect Dev Disabil; 2008 Apr; 46(2):144-9. PubMed ID: 18426251
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Capital punishment and offenders with mental retardation: response to the Penry brief.
Calnen T; Blackman LS
Am J Ment Retard; 1992 May; 96(6):557-64; discussion 565-75. PubMed ID: 1344935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of psychiatry in death penalty defense.
Beck JC
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(4):453-63. PubMed ID: 8054675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mental retardation and the death penalty: current status of exemption legislation.
Keyes DW; Edwards WJ
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1997; 21(5):687-96. PubMed ID: 9385803
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. People with mental retardation are dying, legally.
Keyes D; Edwards W; Perske R
Ment Retard; 1997 Feb; 35(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 9046787
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Observations of a water boy.
Perske R
Ment Retard; 2003 Feb; 41(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 12597725
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The death penalty and persons with mental disabilities: a lethal dose of stigma, sanism, fear of violence, and faulty predictions of dangerousness.
Parry JW
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 2005; 29(5):667-9. PubMed ID: 16379481
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Do tests predict malingering in defendants with mental retardation?
Hayes JS; Hale DB; Gouvier WD
J Psychol; 1997 Sep; 131(5):575-6. PubMed ID: 9333654
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Of Atkins and men: deviations from clinical definitions of mental retardation in death penalty cases.
Blume JH; Johnson SL; Seeds C
Cornell J Law Public Policy; 2009; 18(3):689-733. PubMed ID: 19845060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mitigating mental retardation in capital cases: finding the "invisible" defendant.
Keyes DW; Edwards WJ; Derning TJ
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1998; 22(4):529-39. PubMed ID: 9745243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The American Psychiatric Association's resource document on mental retardation and capital sentencing: implementing Atkins v. Virginia.
Bonnie RJ
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(3):304-8. PubMed ID: 15515919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Commentary: expert testimony as a potential asset in defense of capital sentencing cases.
Edersheim JG; Beck JC
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(4):519-22. PubMed ID: 16394229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. When mitigation evidence makes a difference: effects of psychological mitigating evidence on sentencing decisions in capital trials.
Barnett ME; Brodsky SL; Davis CM
Behav Sci Law; 2004; 22(6):751-70. PubMed ID: 15386561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Psychiatry and the death penalty.
Scott CL
Psychiatr Clin North Am; 2006 Sep; 29(3):791-804. PubMed ID: 16904512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A National Survey of State Legislation defining mental retardation: implications for policy and practice after Atkins.
DeMatteo D; Marczyk G; Pich M
Behav Sci Law; 2007; 25(6):781-802. PubMed ID: 18046743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Large state-level fluctuations in mental retardation classifications related to introduction of renormed intelligence test.
Scullin MH
Am J Ment Retard; 2006 Sep; 111(5):322-35. PubMed ID: 16968141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In the public interest: intellectual disability, the Supreme Court, and the death penalty.
Abeles N
Am Psychol; 2010 Nov; 65(8):743-8. PubMed ID: 21058775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Psychiatry and the death penalty: the landmark Supreme Court cases and their ethical implications for the profession.
Kermani EJ; Kantor JE
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(1):95-108. PubMed ID: 8193393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. AAPL practice guideline for forensic psychiatric evaluation of defendants raising the insanity defense. American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
Giorgi-Guarnieri D; Janofsky J; Keram E; Lawsky S; Merideth P; Mossman D; Schwart-Watts D; Scott C; Thompson J; Zonana H;
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2002; 30(2 Suppl):S3-40. PubMed ID: 12099305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
