These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17755347)

  • 1. Mammography Controversy: NIH's Entree into Evaluating Technology.
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1977 Oct; 198(4313):171-3. PubMed ID: 17755347
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. NIH's Slimmed-Down Strategy.
    Science; 1992 Jan; 255(5044):530. PubMed ID: 17792365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How Much Is Enough? NIH's Best-Funded Labs.
    Cohen J
    Science; 1993 Aug; 261(5125):1123. PubMed ID: 17790341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. NIH's Top Ten.
    Science; 1990 Jul; 249(4967):358. PubMed ID: 17755933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. NIH panels analyze issues on technology.
    Perry S
    Hospitals; 1979 Jun; 53(11):115-6. PubMed ID: 428935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. NIH's ethics panel.
    Palca J
    Nature; 1988 Jul; 334(6179):185. PubMed ID: 3398914
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Congress keen to top NIH's requests.
    Austin P
    Nature; 1988 Mar; 332(6160):99. PubMed ID: 3347255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. NIH's first strategic plan debated.
    Nature; 1992 Feb; 355(6361):573-4. PubMed ID: 1538737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. NIH's newest experiment.
    McKee B
    Architecture; 1996 Mar; 85(3):131-9. PubMed ID: 10156363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Researchers discuss NIH's nanotechnology initiative.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Aug; 18(8):821. PubMed ID: 10932144
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Activities pertinent to NIH's role in overseeing recombinant DNA activities.
    Milewski E
    Recomb DNA Tech Bull; 1984 Jun; 7(2):60-4. PubMed ID: 6473823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mixed response to NIH's web journal plan.
    Butler D; Wadman M
    Nature; 1999 May; 399(6731):8-9. PubMed ID: 10331377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A strategy for the NIH's continuing success.
    Acad Med; 1991 Apr; 66(4):206-7. PubMed ID: 2012650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. NIH's way of setting priorities endorsed.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1998 Mar; 392(6672):116. PubMed ID: 9515947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Re-aim blame for NIH's hard times.
    Bishop JM; Varmus H
    Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5773):499. PubMed ID: 16645053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gold out of lead? The NIH's new "financial management plan".
    Levine AS
    New Biol; 1991 Mar; 3(3):199-202. PubMed ID: 1878348
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Alan Krensky interview. Drawing a map for the twenty-seven divisions in NIH's army.
    Krensky A; Kaiser J
    Science; 2007 Aug; 317(5840):887. PubMed ID: 17702920
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. HEW presses for spending priorities in slicing NIH's basic research pie.
    Demkovich LE
    Natl J (Wash); 1980 Feb; 12(7):276-80. PubMed ID: 10245325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. ASPB's response to the NIH's Public Access Policy.
    Raikhel NV; Ort D; Jorgensen R
    Plant Physiol; 2005 Jun; 138(2):540-1. PubMed ID: 15955908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Global health. Bill Gates plans a hit list, with NIH's help.
    Enserink M
    Science; 2003 Jan; 299(5607):641. PubMed ID: 12560522
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.