These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17760802)

  • 1. Improving participant comprehension in the informed consent process.
    Cohn E; Larson E
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2007; 39(3):273-80. PubMed ID: 17760802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Participant comprehension of research for which they volunteer: a systematic review.
    Montalvo W; Larson E
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2014 Nov; 46(6):423-31. PubMed ID: 25130209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interventions to improve research participants' understanding in informed consent for research: a systematic review.
    Flory J; Emanuel E
    JAMA; 2004 Oct; 292(13):1593-601. PubMed ID: 15467062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving understanding in the research informed consent process: a systematic review of 54 interventions tested in randomized control trials.
    Nishimura A; Carey J; Erwin PJ; Tilburt JC; Murad MH; McCormick JB
    BMC Med Ethics; 2013 Jul; 14():28. PubMed ID: 23879694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interventions to improve patient comprehension in informed consent for medical and surgical procedures: a systematic review.
    Schenker Y; Fernandez A; Sudore R; Schillinger D
    Med Decis Making; 2011; 31(1):151-73. PubMed ID: 20357225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electronic consenting for conducting research remotely: A review of current practice and key recommendations for using e-consenting.
    Skelton E; Drey N; Rutherford M; Ayers S; Malamateniou C
    Int J Med Inform; 2020 Nov; 143():104271. PubMed ID: 32979650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interventions to Improve Patient Comprehension in Informed Consent for Medical and Surgical Procedures: An Updated Systematic Review.
    Glaser J; Nouri S; Fernandez A; Sudore RL; Schillinger D; Klein-Fedyshin M; Schenker Y
    Med Decis Making; 2020 Feb; 40(2):119-143. PubMed ID: 31948345
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Towards better-informed consent: Research with livestock-keepers and informal traders in East Africa.
    Cooper TL; Kirino Y; Alonso S; Lindahl J; Grace D
    Prev Vet Med; 2016 Jun; 128():135-41. PubMed ID: 27237399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving assent in health research: a rapid systematic review.
    Soll D; Guraiib MM; Rollins NC; Reis AA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 May; 20(1):114. PubMed ID: 32404063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reading Level and Comprehension of Research Consent Forms: An Integrative Review.
    Foe G; Larson EL
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2016 Feb; 11(1):31-46. PubMed ID: 27106889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improvement of informed consent and the quality of consent documents.
    Jefford M; Moore R
    Lancet Oncol; 2008 May; 9(5):485-93. PubMed ID: 18452859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors related to volunteer comprehension of informed consent for a clinical trial.
    Kaewpoonsri N; Okanurak K; Kitayaporn D; Kaewkungwal J; Vijaykadga S; Thamaree S
    Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 2006 Sep; 37(5):996-1004. PubMed ID: 17333746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Satisfying the needs of Japanese cancer patients: a comparative study of detailed and standard informed consent documents.
    Sato K; Watanabe T; Katsumata N; Sato T; Ohashi Y
    Clin Trials; 2014 Feb; 11(1):86-95. PubMed ID: 24408900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of participant comprehension of information received in an exercise and diet intervention trial: The DR's EXTRA study.
    Länsimies-Antikainen H; Pietilä AM; Kiviniemi V; Rauramaa R; Laitinen T
    Gerontology; 2010; 56(3):291-7. PubMed ID: 19887763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patients' recollection and understanding of informed consent: a literature review.
    Sherlock A; Brownie S
    ANZ J Surg; 2014 Apr; 84(4):207-10. PubMed ID: 24812707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving the informed consent process for research subjects with low literacy: a systematic review.
    Tamariz L; Palacio A; Robert M; Marcus EN
    J Gen Intern Med; 2013 Jan; 28(1):121-6. PubMed ID: 22782275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Informed consent comprehension and recollection in adult dental patients: A systematic review.
    Moreira NC; Pachêco-Pereira C; Keenan L; Cummings G; Flores-Mir C
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2016 Aug; 147(8):605-619.e7. PubMed ID: 27174578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Testing an alternate informed consent process.
    Yates BC; Dodendorf D; Lane J; LaFramboise L; Pozehl B; Duncan K; Knodel K
    Nurs Res; 2009; 58(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 19289935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
    Allen D; Rixson L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Informed consent to healthcare interventions in people with learning disabilities--an integrative review.
    Goldsmith L; Skirton H; Webb C
    J Adv Nurs; 2008 Dec; 64(6):549-63. PubMed ID: 19120568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.