173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17761078)
1. Assessing the learning curve for laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy.
Ghomi A; Littman P; Prasad A; Einarsson JI
JSLS; 2007; 11(2):190-4. PubMed ID: 17761078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An evaluation of the resident learning curve in performing laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomies as compared with patient outcome: five-year experience.
Ascher-Walsh CJ; Capes T
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(6):719-23. PubMed ID: 17980332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH): an implementation study in 1,952 patients with an analysis of risk factors for conversion to laparotomy and complications, and of procedure-specific re-operations.
Wallwiener M; Taran FA; Rothmund R; Kasperkowiak A; Auwärter G; Ganz A; Kraemer B; Abele H; Schönfisch B; Isaacson KB; Brucker SY
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Dec; 288(6):1329-39. PubMed ID: 23775263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy: a retrospective analysis of 1000 cases.
Bojahr B; Tchartchian G; Ohlinger R
JSLS; 2009; 13(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 19660203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Learning curves for laparoscopic hysterectomy after implementation of minimally invasive surgery.
Mavrova R; Radosa JC; Wagenpfeil G; Hamza A; Solomayer EF; Juhasz-Böss I
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Aug; 134(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 27233815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: Analysis of the surgical learning curve in benign conditions.
Terzi H; Biler A; Demirtas O; Guler OT; Peker N; Kale A
Int J Surg; 2016 Nov; 35():51-57. PubMed ID: 27633451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transition from multiport to single-site surgery: A single institution experience in robotic supracervical hysterectomy for benign gynecological diseases.
Chen CW; Chang HC; Huang TF; Liao CC; Huang RL; Lai HC
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jul; 58(4):514-519. PubMed ID: 31307743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Initial experience with supracervical laparoscopic hysterectomy and removal of the cervical transformation zone.
Ewen SP; Sutton CJ
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1994 Mar; 101(3):225-8. PubMed ID: 8193097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of Surgical Competence: Development and Validation of Rating Scales Used for Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy.
Goderstad JM; Sandvik L; Fosse E; Lieng M
J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(4):600-8. PubMed ID: 26966082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Route, Resource Use, and Outcomes: Change After Power Morcellation Warning.
Desai VB; Wright JD; Lin H; Gross CP; Sallah YH; Schwartz PE; Xu X
Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Aug; 134(2):227-238. PubMed ID: 31348209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Experience with laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Hasson HM; Rotman C; Rana N; Asakura H
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 1993 Nov; 1(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 9050452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy vs. abdominal hysterectomy in a community hospital. A cost comparison.
Simon NV; Laveran RL; Cavanaugh S; Gerlach DH; Jackson JR
J Reprod Med; 1999 Apr; 44(4):339-45. PubMed ID: 10319303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy compared with abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopic vaginal hysterectomy in a primary care hospital setting.
Washington JL
JSLS; 2005; 9(3):292-7. PubMed ID: 16121874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimizing the total laparoscopic hysterectomy procedure for benign uterine pathology.
Malzoni M; Perniola G; Perniola F; Imperato F
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 2004 May; 11(2):211-8. PubMed ID: 15200777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: a comparative study.
Vaisbuch E; Goldchmit C; Ofer D; Agmon A; Hagay Z
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Jun; 126(2):234-8. PubMed ID: 16616408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy with transcervical morcellation: initial experience.
Rosenblatt P; Makai G; DiSciullo A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(3):331-6. PubMed ID: 20417424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perioperative complication rate in 1706 patients after a standardized laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy technique.
Bojahr B; Raatz D; Schonleber G; Abri C; Ohlinger R
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 16698522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation and the learning curve of the first one hundred laparoscopic hysterectomies.
Härkki-Siren P; Sjöberg J
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1995 Sep; 74(8):638-41. PubMed ID: 7660772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of the learning curve for robotic hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.
Sendag F; Zeybek B; Akdemir A; Ozgurel B; Oztekin K
Int J Med Robot; 2014 Sep; 10(3):275-9. PubMed ID: 24376016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
