BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17761185)

  • 1. Ex vivo measurement of lumbar intervertebral disc pressure using fibre-Bragg gratings.
    Dennison CR; Wild PM; Byrnes PW; Saari A; Itshayek E; Wilson DC; Zhu QA; Dvorak MF; Cripton PA; Wilson DR
    J Biomech; 2008; 41(1):221-5. PubMed ID: 17761185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of a novel minimally invasive intervertebral disc pressure sensor utilizing in-fiber Bragg gratings in a porcine model: an ex vivo study.
    Dennison CR; Wild PM; Dvorak MF; Wilson DR; Cripton PA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Aug; 33(17):E589-94. PubMed ID: 18670326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Piezoresistive pressure sensors in the measurement of intervertebral disc hydrostatic pressure.
    Moore MK; Fulop S; Tabib-Azar M; Hart DJ
    Spine J; 2009 Dec; 9(12):1030-4. PubMed ID: 19837007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A biomechanical assessment of disc pressures in the lumbosacral spine in response to external unloading forces.
    Ferrara L; Triano JJ; Sohn MJ; Song E; Lee DD
    Spine J; 2005; 5(5):548-53. PubMed ID: 16153584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Creep associated changes in intervertebral disc bulging obtained with a laser scanning device.
    Heuer F; Schmitt H; Schmidt H; Claes L; Wilke HJ
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Aug; 22(7):737-44. PubMed ID: 17561321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intradiscal pressure, shear strain, and fiber strain in the intervertebral disc under combined loading.
    Schmidt H; Kettler A; Heuer F; Simon U; Claes L; Wilke HJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(7):748-55. PubMed ID: 17414908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Novel model to analyze the effect of a large compressive follower pre-load on range of motions in a lumbar spine.
    Renner SM; Natarajan RN; Patwardhan AG; Havey RM; Voronov LI; Guo BY; Andersson GB; An HS
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(6):1326-32. PubMed ID: 16843473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of strain rate on the compressive stiffness properties of human lumbar intervertebral discs.
    Kemper AR; McNally C; Duma SM
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2007; 43():176-81. PubMed ID: 17487077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy and repeatability of a new method for measuring facet loads in the lumbar spine.
    Wilson DC; Niosi CA; Zhu QA; Oxland TR; Wilson DR
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(2):348-53. PubMed ID: 16321637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of load transfer characteristics of a dynamic stabilization device on disc loading under compression.
    Zhang QH; Zhou YL; Petit D; Teo EC
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 Jun; 31(5):533-8. PubMed ID: 19038569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intradiscal pressure changes with dynamic pedicle screw systems.
    Dath R; Sirkett DM; Gheduzzi S; Miles AW
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Jun; 21(4):241-6. PubMed ID: 18525483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stress distribution in the intervertebral disc correlates with strength distribution in subdiscal trabecular bone in the porcine lumbar spine.
    Ryan G; Pandit A; Apatsidis D
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Aug; 23(7):859-69. PubMed ID: 18423954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Direct real-time measurement of in vivo forces in the lumbar spine.
    Ledet EH; Tymeson MP; DiRisio DJ; Cohen B; Uhl RL
    Spine J; 2005; 5(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 15653089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Torsion-induced pressure distribution changes in human intervertebral discs: an in vitro study.
    Yantzer BK; Freeman TB; Lee WE; Nichols T; Inamasu J; Guiot B; Johnson WM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(8):881-4. PubMed ID: 17426632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Proof of the biomechanical effect of a lumbar spine-relief orthosis for treatment of sacroiliac pain].
    Höfer S; Siemsen CH
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2008; 146(4):439-43. PubMed ID: 18704838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lumbar disc volume measured by MRI: effects of bed rest, horizontal exercise, and vertical loading.
    Hutton WC; Malko JA; Fajman WA
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2003 Jan; 74(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 12546302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implantable MEMS compressive stress sensors: Design, fabrication and calibration with application to the disc annulus.
    Glos DL; Sauser FE; Papautsky I; Bylski-Austrow DI
    J Biomech; 2010 Aug; 43(11):2244-8. PubMed ID: 20451207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of surface strain data and a neural networks solution method to determine lumbar facet joint loads during in vitro spine testing.
    Sawa AG; Crawford NR
    J Biomech; 2008 Aug; 41(12):2647-53. PubMed ID: 18657814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fibre optic Bragg grating sensors: an alternative method to strain gauges for measuring deformation in bone.
    Fresvig T; Ludvigsen P; Steen H; Reikerås O
    Med Eng Phys; 2008 Jan; 30(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 17369073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Role of load history in intervertebral disc mechanics and intradiscal pressure generation.
    Hwang D; Gabai AS; Yu M; Yew AG; Hsieh AH
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2012 Jan; 11(1-2):95-106. PubMed ID: 21380846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.