These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17761185)

  • 21. Measurement of geometric deformation of lumbar intervertebral discs under in-vivo weightbearing condition.
    Wang S; Xia Q; Passias P; Wood K; Li G
    J Biomech; 2009 Apr; 42(6):705-11. PubMed ID: 19268946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Total disc replacement positioning affects facet contact forces and vertebral body strains.
    Rundell SA; Auerbach JD; Balderston RA; Kurtz SM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(23):2510-7. PubMed ID: 18978591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. In vitro measurement of pressure differences using manometry at various injection speeds during discography.
    Seo KS; Derby R; Date ES; Lee SH; Kim BJ; Lee CH
    Spine J; 2007; 7(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 17197335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Changes in spinal height following sustained lumbar flexion and extension postures: a clinical measure of intervertebral disc hydration using stadiometry.
    Owens SC; Brismée JM; Pennell PN; Dedrick GS; Sizer PS; James CR
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2009 Jun; 32(5):358-63. PubMed ID: 19539118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Biomechanical implications of degenerative joint disease in the apophyseal joints of human thoracic and lumbar vertebrae.
    Brown KR; Pollintine P; Adams MA
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2008 Jul; 136(3):318-26. PubMed ID: 18324643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Biomechanical effect of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement: a study with finite element analysis.
    Chung SK; Kim YE; Wang KC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1281-6. PubMed ID: 19455003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Relationship between everyday activities and spinal shrinkage.
    van Deursen LL; van Deursen DL; Snijders CJ; Wilke HJ
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Jun; 20(5):547-50. PubMed ID: 15836943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. In vivo porcine intradiscal pressure as a function of external loading.
    Ekström L; Holm S; Holm AK; Hansson T
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2004 Aug; 17(4):312-6. PubMed ID: 15280761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Biomechanical comparison of a two-level Maverick disc replacement with a hybrid one-level disc replacement and one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Erkan S; Rivera Y; Wu C; Mehbod AA; Transfeldt EE
    Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):830-5. PubMed ID: 19477692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of animal discs used in disc research to human lumbar disc: axial compression mechanics and glycosaminoglycan content.
    Beckstein JC; Sen S; Schaer TP; Vresilovic EJ; Elliott DM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Mar; 33(6):E166-73. PubMed ID: 18344845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Experimental and model determination of human intervertebral disc osmoviscoelasticity.
    Schroeder Y; Elliott DM; Wilson W; Baaijens FP; Huyghe JM
    J Orthop Res; 2008 Aug; 26(8):1141-6. PubMed ID: 18327799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Internal and external responses of anterior lumbar/lumbosacral fusion: nonlinear finite element analysis.
    Guan Y; Yoganandan N; Maiman DJ; Pintar FA
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Jun; 21(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 18525492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Relaxation of forces needed to distract cervical vertebrae after discectomy: a biomechanical study.
    Aryan HE; Newman CB; Lu DC; Hu SS; Tay BK; Bradford DS; Puttlitz CM; Ames CP
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Apr; 22(2):100-4. PubMed ID: 19342931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Rest cannot always recover the dynamic properties of fatigue-loaded intervertebral disc.
    Wang JL; Wu TK; Lin TC; Cheng CH; Huang SC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Aug; 33(17):1863-9. PubMed ID: 18670339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A comparison of the effects of automated percutaneous diskectomy and conventional diskectomy on intradiscal pressure, disk geometry, and stiffness.
    Shea M; Takeuchi TY; Wittenberg RH; White AA; Hayes WC
    J Spinal Disord; 1994 Aug; 7(4):317-25. PubMed ID: 7949699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prospective, randomized trial of metal-on-metal artificial lumbar disc replacement: initial results for treatment of discogenic pain.
    Sasso RC; Foulk DM; Hahn M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 18197095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Biologic response of the intervertebral disc to static and dynamic compression in vitro.
    Wang DL; Jiang SD; Dai LY
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Nov; 32(23):2521-8. PubMed ID: 17978649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Failure strength of the bovine caudal disc under internal hydrostatic pressure.
    Schechtman H; Robertson PA; Broom ND
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(8):1401-9. PubMed ID: 15964006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The relation between intervertebral disc bulging and annular fiber associated strains for simple and complex loading.
    Heuer F; Schmidt H; Wilke HJ
    J Biomech; 2008; 41(5):1086-94. PubMed ID: 18187139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The viscoelastic standard nonlinear solid model: predicting the response of the lumbar intervertebral disk to low-frequency vibrations.
    Groth KM; Granata KP
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Jun; 130(3):031005. PubMed ID: 18532854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.