BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17761723)

  • 1. Body position-dependent shift in odor percept present only for perithreshold odors.
    Lundström JN; Boyle JA; Jones-Gotman M
    Chem Senses; 2008 Jan; 33(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 17761723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sit up and smell the roses better: olfactory sensitivity to phenyl ethyl alcohol is dependent on body position.
    Lundström JN; Boyle JA; Jones-Gotman M
    Chem Senses; 2006 Mar; 31(3):249-52. PubMed ID: 16394243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Higher sensitivity to perithreshold odors when sitting than when supine may be correlated with postural differences in locus coeruleus activity.
    Lipnicki DM
    Chem Senses; 2008 Feb; 33(2):223-4. PubMed ID: 18032371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The perception of odor is not a surrogate marker for chemical exposure: a review of factors influencing human odor perception.
    Greenberg MI; Curtis JA; Vearrier D
    Clin Toxicol (Phila); 2013 Feb; 51(2):70-6. PubMed ID: 23387344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of smoking on olfactory thresholds of phenyl ethyl alcohol and n-butanol.
    Hayes JE; Jinks AL
    Physiol Behav; 2012 Sep; 107(2):177-80. PubMed ID: 22776624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A rose by any other name: would it smell as sweet?
    Djordjevic J; Lundstrom JN; Clément F; Boyle JA; Pouliot S; Jones-Gotman M
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Jan; 99(1):386-93. PubMed ID: 17959740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison between odor thresholds for phenyl ethyl alcohol and butanol.
    Croy I; Lange K; Krone F; Negoias S; Seo HS; Hummel T
    Chem Senses; 2009 Jul; 34(6):523-7. PubMed ID: 19525318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of lateralized and binasal olfactory thresholds.
    Frasnelli J; Livermore A; Soiffer A; Hummel T
    Rhinology; 2002 Sep; 40(3):129-34. PubMed ID: 12357712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pregnancy does not affect human olfactory detection thresholds.
    Cameron EL
    Chem Senses; 2014 Feb; 39(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 24302690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differential sex effects in olfactory functioning: the role of verbal processing.
    Oberg C; Larsson M; Bäckman L
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2002 Jul; 8(5):691-8. PubMed ID: 12164678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correlation analyses of detection thresholds of four different odorants.
    Zernecke R; Frank T; Haegler K; Albrecht J; Bruckmann H; Wiesmann M
    Rhinology; 2011 Aug; 49(3):331-6. PubMed ID: 21858265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Identification of unpleasant odors is independent of age.
    Konstantinidis I; Hummel T; Larsson M
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2006 Oct; 21(7):615-21. PubMed ID: 16920329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cross-cultural application of the "Sniffin' Sticks" odor identification test.
    Shu CH; Yuan BC; Lin SH; Lin CZ
    Am J Rhinol; 2007; 21(5):570-3. PubMed ID: 17999792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Emotional processing of odors: evidence for a nonlinear relation between pleasantness and familiarity evaluations.
    Delplanque S; Grandjean D; Chrea C; Aymard L; Cayeux I; Le Calvé B; Velazco MI; Scherer KR; Sander D
    Chem Senses; 2008 Jun; 33(5):469-79. PubMed ID: 18403383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Global study of variability in olfactory sensitivity.
    Oleszkiewicz A; Alizadeh R; Altundag A; Chen B; Corrai A; Fanari R; Farhadi M; Gupta N; Habel R; Hudson R; Hughes JL; Joshi A; Kamrava SK; Luckett C; Mahmut MK; Masala C; Mori E; Pellegrino R; Piras R; Resler K; Rivas-Castro A; Saluja S; Sharma S; Shimmura H; Soler GM; Stefańczyk MM; Sun Z; Thaploo D; Wei Y; Yan X; Hummel T
    Behav Neurosci; 2020 Oct; 134(5):394-406. PubMed ID: 33001681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Olfactory adaptation as a factor limiting the warning role of odors].
    Kośmider J
    Med Pr; 1990; 41(3):142-7. PubMed ID: 2233237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Age dependency of heart rate variability, blood pressure variability and baroreflex sensitivity].
    Wang SY; Zhang LF; Wang XB; Cheng JH
    Space Med Med Eng (Beijing); 2000 Oct; 13(5):318-22. PubMed ID: 11894867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Just noticeable differences in component concentrations modify the odor quality of a blending mixture.
    Le Berre E; Béno N; Ishii A; Chabanet C; Etiévant P; Thomas-Danguin T
    Chem Senses; 2008 Apr; 33(4):389-95. PubMed ID: 18304991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of methods for sniff measurement concurrent with olfactory tasks in humans.
    Johnson BN; Russell C; Khan RM; Sobel N
    Chem Senses; 2006 Nov; 31(9):795-806. PubMed ID: 16914503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speed and accuracy of olfactory discrimination in the rat.
    Uchida N; Mainen ZF
    Nat Neurosci; 2003 Nov; 6(11):1224-9. PubMed ID: 14566341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.