These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17761756)
21. Ethical questions to ponder in the European stem cell patent debate. Curley D; Sharples A J Biolaw Bus; 2006; 9(3):12-6. PubMed ID: 17152135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The human use of humanoid beings: chimeras and patent law. Rabin S Nat Biotechnol; 2006 May; 24(5):517-9. PubMed ID: 16680130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The morality of biotech patents: differing legal obligations in Europe? Ford R Eur Intellect Prop Rev; 1997 Jun; 19(6):315-8. PubMed ID: 16538738 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Challenges to human embryonic stem cell patents. Plomer A; Taymor KS; Scott CT Cell Stem Cell; 2008 Jan; 2(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 18371416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The prodigal son: the relationship between patent law and health care. Bostyn SJ Med Law Rev; 2003; 11(1):67-120. PubMed ID: 14606473 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Ethical aspects of patenting human genotypes according to EC Biotechnology Directive. Spranger TM IIC Int Rev Ind Prop Copyr Law; 2000 Jun; 31(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 12956125 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Intellectual property protection for plant-related inventions in Europe. Fleck B; Baldock C Nat Rev Genet; 2003 Oct; 4(10):834-8. PubMed ID: 14526379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Patents on life? No patent on life!]. van Raden L Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1998 Mar; 105(3):90-3. PubMed ID: 9581373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Monsters at the patent office: the inconsistent conclusions of moral utility and the controversy of human cloning. Smith AR De Paul Law Rev; 2003; 53(1):159-203. PubMed ID: 15568254 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Patentability of biotechnological inventions in countries of the Pacific Rim. Cox GB; Wong SS; Waters S; Santer VB Australas Biotechnol; 1994; 4(5):274-7. PubMed ID: 7765672 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Patentability of life and ethics. Lenoir N C R Biol; 2003; 326(10-11):1127-34. PubMed ID: 14744124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Status, sale and patenting of human genetic material: an international survey. Knoppers BM Nat Genet; 1999 May; 22(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 10319857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The logical next step? An international perspective on the issues of human cloning and genetic technology. Corsover JT ILSA J Int Law; 1998; 4(2):697-758. PubMed ID: 14626268 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Ethical limitations in patenting biotechnological inventions. Lugagnani V Forum (Genova); 1999; 9(3 Suppl 3):93-8. PubMed ID: 10607853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Directive 98/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 July 1998 on the legal protection of biotechnological inventions. Forum (Genova); 1999; 9(3 Suppl 3):15-24. PubMed ID: 10651517 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Are natural gene sequences patentable? Becker KB Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 2000 Jun; 73 Suppl():S19-22. PubMed ID: 10968555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Patenting human beings: do sub-human creatures deserve constitutional protection? Fishman RE Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(4):461-82. PubMed ID: 2699160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]