187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17761798)
1. Mini-implants for retraction, intrusion and protraction in a Class II division 1 patient.
Upadhyay M; Yadav S
J Orthod; 2007 Sep; 34(3):158-67. PubMed ID: 17761798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of changes following en-masse retraction with mini-implants anchorage compared to two-step retraction with conventional anchorage in patients with class II division 1 malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial.
Al-Sibaie S; Hajeer MY
Eur J Orthod; 2014 Jun; 36(3):275-83. PubMed ID: 23787192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional dental model analysis of treatment outcomes for protrusive maxillary dentition: comparison of headgear, miniscrew, and miniplate skeletal anchorage.
Lai EH; Yao CC; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):636-45. PubMed ID: 18984395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Unusual extraction treatment in Class II division 1 using C-orthodontic mini-implants.
Chung KR; Cho JH; Kim SH; Kook YA; Cozzani M
Angle Orthod; 2007 Jan; 77(1):155-66. PubMed ID: 17029536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mini-implant anchorage for en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth: a clinical cephalometric study.
Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Patil S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):803-10. PubMed ID: 19061808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mini-implants for en masse intrusion of maxillary anterior teeth in a severe Class II division 2 malocclusion.
Upadhyay M; Nagaraj K; Yadav S; Saxena R
J Orthod; 2008 Jun; 35(2):79-89. PubMed ID: 18525071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Versatility and benefits of mini-implants for vertical and sagittal anchorage in a growing open bite class II patient.
Estelita S; Janson G; Chiqueto K
J Orthod; 2012 Mar; 39(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 22433326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Treatment effects of mini-implants for en-masse retraction of anterior teeth in bialveolar dental protrusion patients: a randomized controlled trial.
Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Nagaraj K; Patil S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):18-29.e1. PubMed ID: 18617099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adult Class II Division 1 patient with severe gummy smile treated with temporary anchorage devices.
Shu R; Huang L; Bai D
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jul; 140(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 21724093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dentoskeletal and soft tissue effects of mini-implants in Class II division 1 patients.
Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Nagaraj K; Nanda R
Angle Orthod; 2009 Mar; 79(2):240-7. PubMed ID: 19216590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mini-implant anchorage for a skeletal class II malocclusion with missing mandibular incisors: a case report.
Nagaraj K; Upadhyay M; Yadav S
World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):155-66. PubMed ID: 18575310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Atypical orthodontic extraction pattern managed by differential en-masse retraction against a temporary skeletal anchorage device in the treatment of bimaxillary protrusion.
Chung KR; Choo H; Lee JH; Kim SH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Sep; 140(3):423-32. PubMed ID: 21889088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Class II malocclusion treated by combining a lingual retractor and a palatal plate.
Chung KR; Kook YA; Kim SH; Mo SS; Jung JA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jan; 133(1):112-23. PubMed ID: 18174081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Midpalatal implants vs headgear for orthodontic anchorage--a randomized clinical trial: cephalometric results.
Benson PE; Tinsley D; O'Dwyer JJ; Majumdar A; Doyle P; Sandler PJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):606-15. PubMed ID: 18005834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intrusion of maxillary incisors by mini-screw anchorage of Angle Class II division 2 malocclusion cases.
Al-Falahi BA; Hammad SM; El-Kenawy MH; Fouda MA
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2012; 23(4):29-35. PubMed ID: 23413639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Apical root resorption in orthodontic patients with en-masse maxillary anterior retraction and intrusion with miniscrews.
Liou EJ; Chang PM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Feb; 137(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 20152676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A minimally invasive modality for simultaneous bimaxillary en masse retraction.
Paik CH; Seo YJ; Baek SH
J Clin Orthod; 2012 Feb; 46(2):92-101; quiz 123-4. PubMed ID: 22803262
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Treatment of skeletal 2 malocclusion using bone-plate anchorage. A case report.
Kraikosol K; Rattanayatikul C; Godfrey K; Vattraphudej T
Aust Orthod J; 2007 May; 23(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 17679538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A new protocol of Tweed-Merrifield directional force technology with microimplant anchorage.
Chae JM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jul; 130(1):100-9. PubMed ID: 16849080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
