These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17761959)

  • 1. Quantification of health states with rank-based nonmetric multidimensional scaling.
    Krabbe PF; Salomon JA; Murray CJ
    Med Decis Making; 2007; 27(4):395-405. PubMed ID: 17761959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inconsistencies in TTO and VAS values for EQ-5D health states.
    Lamers LM; Stalmeier PF; Krabbe PF; Busschbach JJ
    Med Decis Making; 2006; 26(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 16525171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A single European currency for EQ-5D health states. Results from a six-country study.
    Greiner W; Weijnen T; Nieuwenhuizen M; Oppe S; Badia X; Busschbach J; Buxton M; Dolan P; Kind P; Krabbe P; Ohinmaa A; Parkin D; Roset M; Sintonen H; Tsuchiya A; de Charro F
    Eur J Health Econ; 2003 Sep; 4(3):222-31. PubMed ID: 15609189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Thurstone scaling as a measurement method to quantify subjective health outcomes.
    Krabbe PF
    Med Care; 2008 Apr; 46(4):357-65. PubMed ID: 18362814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A social preference valuations set for EQ-5D health states in Flanders, Belgium.
    Cleemput I
    Eur J Health Econ; 2010 Apr; 11(2):205-13. PubMed ID: 19582490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The gap effect: discontinuities of preferences around dead.
    Stalmeier PF; Busschbach JJ; Lamers LM; Krabbe PF
    Health Econ; 2005 Jul; 14(7):679-85. PubMed ID: 15744750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reconsidering the use of rankings in the valuation of health states: a model for estimating cardinal values from ordinal data.
    Salomon JA
    Popul Health Metr; 2003 Dec; 1(1):12. PubMed ID: 14687419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modeling ranking, time trade-off, and visual analog scale values for EQ-5D health states: a review and comparison of methods.
    Craig BM; Busschbach JJ; Salomon JA
    Med Care; 2009 Jun; 47(6):634-41. PubMed ID: 19433996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Keep it simple: ranking health states yields values similar to cardinal measurement approaches.
    Craig BM; Busschbach JJ; Salomon JA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Mar; 62(3):296-305. PubMed ID: 18945585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The performance of a value set for the EQ-5D based on experienced health states in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.
    Leidl R; Reitmeir P; König HH; Stark R
    Value Health; 2012 Jan; 15(1):151-7. PubMed ID: 22264983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multi-method approach to valuing health states: problems with meaning.
    Nord E; Menzel P; Richardson J
    Health Econ; 2006 Feb; 15(2):215-8. PubMed ID: 16389641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The transformation of utilities for health states worse than death: consequences for the estimation of EQ-5D value sets.
    Lamers LM
    Med Care; 2007 Mar; 45(3):238-44. PubMed ID: 17304081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Re-scaling social preference data: implications for modelling.
    Cleemput I; Kind P; Kesteloot K
    Eur J Health Econ; 2004 Dec; 5(4):290-8. PubMed ID: 15759169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Generation of a Danish TTO value set for EQ-5D health states.
    Wittrup-Jensen KU; Lauridsen J; Gudex C; Pedersen KM
    Scand J Public Health; 2009 Jul; 37(5):459-66. PubMed ID: 19411320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of population health status in six european countries: results of a representative survey using the EQ-5D questionnaire.
    König HH; Bernert S; Angermeyer MC; Matschinger H; Martinez M; Vilagut G; Haro JM; de Girolamo G; de Graaf R; Kovess V; Alonso J;
    Med Care; 2009 Feb; 47(2):255-61. PubMed ID: 19169128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A multi-method approach to measuring health-state valuations.
    Salomon JA; Murray CJ
    Health Econ; 2004 Mar; 13(3):281-90. PubMed ID: 14981652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A "new and improved" EQ-5D valuation questionnaire? Results from a pilot study.
    Devlin N; Hansen P; Herbison P; Macran S
    Eur J Health Econ; 2005 Mar; 6(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 15586307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Health status of adults in Germany: results from a representative survey using the EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D)].
    Mielck A; Vogelmann M; Schweikert B; Leidl R
    Gesundheitswesen; 2010; 72(8-9):476-86. PubMed ID: 19802780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating EuroQol EQ-5D scores from Population Healthy Days data.
    Jia H; Lubetkin EI
    Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(4):491-9. PubMed ID: 18556640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The validity of EQ-5D US preference weights in liver transplant candidates and recipients.
    Russell RT; Feurer ID; Wisawatapnimit P; Pinson CW
    Liver Transpl; 2009 Jan; 15(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 19109831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.