368 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17762088)
1. Probabilistic forward model for electroencephalography source analysis.
Plis SM; George JS; Jun SC; Ranken DM; Volegov PL; Schmidt DM
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 52(17):5309-27. PubMed ID: 17762088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimating brain conductivities and dipole source signals with EEG arrays.
Gutiérrez D; Nehorai A; Muravchik CH
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Dec; 51(12):2113-22. PubMed ID: 15605858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Parametric surface-source modeling and estimation with electroencephalography.
Cao N; Yetik IS; Nehorai A; Muravchik CH; Haueisen J
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Dec; 53(12 Pt 1):2414-24. PubMed ID: 17153198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimating parametric line-source models with electroencephalography.
Cao N; Yetik IS; Nehorai A; Muravchik CH; Haueisen J
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Nov; 53(11):2156-65. PubMed ID: 17073320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dipole estimation errors due to differences in modeling anisotropic conductivities in realistic head models for EEG source analysis.
Hallez H; Vanrumste B; Van Hese P; Delputte S; Lemahieu I
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Apr; 53(7):1877-94. PubMed ID: 18364544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of anisotropic electrical conductivity in white matter tissue on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse solution. A high-resolution whole head simulation study.
Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Reichenbach JR
Neuroimage; 2010 May; 51(1):145-63. PubMed ID: 20156576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Array response kernels for EEG and MEG in multilayer ellipsoidal geometry.
Gutiérrez D; Nehorai A
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Mar; 55(3):1103-11. PubMed ID: 18334402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computational modeling of human head electromagnetics for source localization of milliscale brain dynamics.
Malony AD; Salman A; Turovets S; Tucker D; Volkov V; Li K; Song JE; Biersdorff S; Davey C; Hoge C; Hammond D
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2011; 163():329-35. PubMed ID: 21335813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of conductivity uncertainties and modeling errors on EEG source localization using a 2-D model.
Awada KA; Jackson DR; Baumann SB; Williams JT; Wilton DR; Fink PW; Prasky BR
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Sep; 45(9):1135-45. PubMed ID: 9735563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of head tissue conductivity in forward and inverse magnetoencephalographic simulations using realistic head models.
Van Uitert R; Johnson C; Zhukov L
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Dec; 51(12):2129-37. PubMed ID: 15605860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dipole estimation errors due to not incorporating anisotropic conductivities in realistic head models for EEG source analysis.
Hallez H; Staelens S; Lemahieu I
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Oct; 54(20):6079-93. PubMed ID: 19779215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Line-source modeling and estimation with magnetoencephalography.
Yetik IS; Nehorai A; Muravchik CH; Haueisen J
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 May; 52(5):839-51. PubMed ID: 15887533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Conventional and reciprocal approaches to the inverse dipole localization problem of electroencephalography.
Finke S; Gulrajani RM; Gotman J
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jun; 50(6):657-66. PubMed ID: 12814232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of anisotropic conductivity on EEG source reconstruction: investigations in a rabbit model.
Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Eiselt M; Giessler F; Flemming L; Anwander A; Knösche TR; Wolters CH; Dümpelmann M; Tuch DS; Reichenbach JR
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Sep; 53(9):1841-50. PubMed ID: 16941840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of tissue conductivity anisotropy on EEG/MEG field and return current computation in a realistic head model: a simulation and visualization study using high-resolution finite element modeling.
Wolters CH; Anwander A; Tricoche X; Weinstein D; Koch MA; MacLeod RS
Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(3):813-26. PubMed ID: 16364662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of anisotropic modelling in electrical impedance tomography: description of method and preliminary assessment of utility in imaging brain function in the adult human head.
Abascal JF; Arridge SR; Atkinson D; Horesh R; Fabrizi L; De Lucia M; Horesh L; Bayford RH; Holder DS
Neuroimage; 2008 Nov; 43(2):258-68. PubMed ID: 18694835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of skull conductivity perturbations on EEG dipole source analysis.
Chen F; Hallez H; Staelens S
Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4475-84. PubMed ID: 20879606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of geometric head model perturbations on the EEG forward and inverse problems.
von Ellenrieder N; Muravchik CH; Nehorai A
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Mar; 53(3):421-9. PubMed ID: 16532768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of skull resistivity on the spatial resolutions of EEG and MEG.
Malmivuo JA; Suihko VE
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Jul; 51(7):1276-80. PubMed ID: 15248545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Image reconstruction incorporated with the skull inhomogeneity for electrical impedance tomography.
Ni A; Dong X; Yang G; Fu F; Tang C
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2008 Jul; 32(5):409-15. PubMed ID: 18501557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
