414 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17762290)
1. A comparison of fatigue failure responses of old versus middle-aged lumbar motion segments in simulated flexed lifting.
Gallagher S; Marras WS; Litsky AS; Burr D; Landoll J; Matkovic V
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Aug; 32(17):1832-9. PubMed ID: 17762290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Torso flexion loads and the fatigue failure of human lumbosacral motion segments.
Gallagher S; Marras WS; Litsky AS; Burr D
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Oct; 30(20):2265-73. PubMed ID: 16227888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Response of Charité total disc replacement under physiologic loads: prosthesis component motion patterns.
O'Leary P; Nicolakis M; Lorenz MA; Voronov LI; Zindrick MR; Ghanayem A; Havey RM; Carandang G; Sartori M; Gaitanis IN; Fronczak S; Patwardhan AG
Spine J; 2005; 5(6):590-9. PubMed ID: 16291097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fatigue failure in shear loading of porcine lumbar spine segments.
van Dieën JH; van der Veen A; van Royen BJ; Kingma I
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Jul; 31(15):E494-8. PubMed ID: 16816749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical evaluation of a new total posterior-element replacement system.
Wilke HJ; Schmidt H; Werner K; Schmölz W; Drumm J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(24):2790-6; discussion 2797. PubMed ID: 17108830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adjacent segment motion after a simulated lumbar fusion in different sagittal alignments: a biomechanical analysis.
Akamaru T; Kawahara N; Tim Yoon S; Minamide A; Su Kim K; Tomita K; Hutton WC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul; 28(14):1560-6. PubMed ID: 12865845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System after complete laminectomy-facetectomy on the biomechanics of implanted and adjacent segments.
Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Renner SM; Rosler DM; Ochoa JA; Patwardhan AG
Spine J; 2009; 9(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 18440280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Junction kinematics between proximal mobile and distal fused lumbar segments: biomechanical analysis of pedicle and hook constructs.
Hongo M; Gay RE; Zhao KD; Ilharreborde B; Huddleston PM; Berglund LJ; An KN; Zhao C
Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):846-53. PubMed ID: 19660990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An exploratory study of loading and morphometric factors associated with specific failure modes in fatigue testing of lumbar motion segments.
Gallagher S; Marras WS; Litsky AS; Burr D
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Mar; 21(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 16297512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of slouching and lumbar support on iliolumbar ligaments, intervertebral discs and sacroiliac joints.
Snijders CJ; Hermans PF; Niesing R; Spoor CW; Stoeckart R
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 May; 19(4):323-9. PubMed ID: 15109750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical comparison of three methods of sacral fracture fixation in osteoporotic bone.
Mears SC; Sutter EG; Wall SJ; Rose DM; Belkoff SM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 May; 35(10):E392-5. PubMed ID: 20393387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The time-varying response of the in vivo lumbar spine to dynamic repetitive flexion.
Parkinson RJ; Beach TA; Callaghan JP
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 May; 19(4):330-6. PubMed ID: 15109751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical comparison of anterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Ploumis A; Wu C; Fischer G; Mehbod AA; Wu W; Faundez A; Transfeldt EE
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Apr; 21(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 18391717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Strength of the cervical spine in compression and bending.
Przybyla AS; Skrzypiec D; Pollintine P; Dolan P; Adams MA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jul; 32(15):1612-20. PubMed ID: 17621208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Enhancing the stability of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical comparison of anterior plate versus posterior transpedicular instrumentation.
Tzermiadianos MN; Mekhail A; Voronov LI; Zook J; Havey RM; Renner SM; Carandang G; Abjornson C; Patwardhan AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(2):E38-43. PubMed ID: 18197089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of posture and loading on interfacet spacing: an investigation using magnetic resonance imaging on porcine spinal units.
Drake JD; Dobson H; Callaghan JP
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Sep; 33(20):E728-34. PubMed ID: 18794747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects of creep and recovery on the in vitro biomechanical characteristics of human multi-level thoracolumbar spinal segments.
Busscher I; van Dieën JH; van der Veen AJ; Kingma I; Meijer GJ; Verkerke GJ; Veldhuizen AG
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2011 Jun; 26(5):438-44. PubMed ID: 21251737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of screw positioning in a new anterior spine fixator on implant loosening in osteoporotic vertebrae.
Reinhold M; Schwieger K; Goldhahn J; Linke B; Knop C; Blauth M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Feb; 31(4):406-13. PubMed ID: 16481950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mechanical behavior of the human lumbar spine. II. Fatigue strength during dynamic compressive loading.
Hansson TH; Keller TS; Spengler DM
J Orthop Res; 1987; 5(4):479-87. PubMed ID: 3681522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors associated with lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration in the elderly.
Hangai M; Kaneoka K; Kuno S; Hinotsu S; Sakane M; Mamizuka N; Sakai S; Ochiai N
Spine J; 2008; 8(5):732-40. PubMed ID: 18037353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]