208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17762542)
1. Combining myocardial perfusion imaging with computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease.
Mahmarian JJ
Curr Opin Cardiol; 2007 Sep; 22(5):413-21. PubMed ID: 17762542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hybrid SPECT-CT: integration of CT coronary artery calcium scoring and angiography with myocardial perfusion.
Mahmarian JJ
Curr Cardiol Rep; 2007 Apr; 9(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 17430680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relationship and prognostic value of coronary artery calcification by electron beam computed tomography to stress-induced ischemia by single photon emission computed tomography.
Ramakrishna G; Miller TD; Breen JF; Araoz PA; Hodge DO; Gibbons RJ
Am Heart J; 2007 May; 153(5):807-14. PubMed ID: 17452158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Abnormal electron beam computed tomography results: the value of repeating myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography in the ongoing assessment of coronary artery disease.
Askew JW; Miller TD; Araoz PA; Breen JF; Hodge DO; Gibbons RJ
Mayo Clin Proc; 2008 Jan; 83(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 18174005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion imaging compared to invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve meta-analysis.
Takx RA; Blomberg BA; El Aidi H; Habets J; de Jong PA; Nagel E; Hoffmann U; Leiner T
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 25596143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Noninvasive anatomical coronary artery imaging versus myocardial perfusion imaging: which confers superior diagnostic and prognostic information?
Hacioglu Y; Gupta M; Budoff MJ
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(5):637-44. PubMed ID: 20861763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computed tomography coronary calcium screening and myocardial perfusion imaging.
Raggi P; Berman DS
J Nucl Cardiol; 2005; 12(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 15682370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multidetector computed tomography coronary artery plaque predictors of stress-induced myocardial ischemia by SPECT.
Lin F; Shaw LJ; Berman DS; Callister TQ; Weinsaft JW; Wong FJ; Szulc M; Tandon V; Okin PM; Devereux RB; Min JK
Atherosclerosis; 2008 Apr; 197(2):700-9. PubMed ID: 17720167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of coronary calcium and stress myocardial perfusion imaging in apparently healthy siblings of individuals with premature coronary artery disease.
Blumenthal RS; Becker DM; Yanek LR; Moy TF; Michos ED; Fishman EK; Becker LC
Am J Cardiol; 2006 Feb; 97(3):328-33. PubMed ID: 16442390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative use of radionuclide stress testing, coronary artery calcium scanning, and noninvasive coronary angiography for diagnostic and prognostic cardiac assessment.
Berman DS; Shaw LJ; Hachamovitch R; Friedman JD; Polk DM; Hayes SW; Thomson LE; Germano G; Wong ND; Kang X; Rozanski A
Semin Nucl Med; 2007 Jan; 37(1):2-16. PubMed ID: 17161035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative regional analysis of coronary atherosclerosis and calcium score on multislice CT versus myocardial perfusion on SPECT.
Schuijf JD; Wijns W; Jukema JW; Decramer I; Atsma DE; de Roos A; Stokkel MP; Dibbets-Schneider P; van der Wall EE; Bax JJ
J Nucl Med; 2006 Nov; 47(11):1749-55. PubMed ID: 17079806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Evaluation of hemodynamic significance of arteriovenous coronary fistulas: diagnostic integration of coronary angiography and stress/rest myocardial scintigraphy].
Rubini G; Ettorre GC; Sebastiani M; Bovenzi F
Radiol Med; 2000 Dec; 100(6):453-8. PubMed ID: 11307506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adenosine single photon emission computed tomography for assessing risk after myocardial infarction: recent developments.
Dorfman TA; Iskandrian AE
Curr Opin Cardiol; 2007 Sep; 22(5):401-7. PubMed ID: 17762540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Myocardial perfusion by CT versus hybrid imaging.
George RT; Mehra VC; Saraste A; Knuuti J
Cardiol Clin; 2012 Feb; 30(1):135-46. PubMed ID: 22304955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hybrid Imaging in Ischemic Heart Disease.
Giannopoulos AA; Gaemperli O
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed); 2018 May; 71(5):382-390. PubMed ID: 29329818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of noninvasive imaging in coronary artery disease detection, prognosis, and clinical decision making.
Dowsley T; Al-Mallah M; Ananthasubramaniam K; Dwivedi G; McArdle B; Chow BJ
Can J Cardiol; 2013 Mar; 29(3):285-96. PubMed ID: 23357601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Integration of coronary anatomy and myocardial perfusion imaging.
Blankstein R; Di Carli MF
Nat Rev Cardiol; 2010 Apr; 7(4):226-36. PubMed ID: 20212502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Non-invasive imaging of coronary artery disease.
Stirrup J; Underwood SR
Br J Hosp Med (Lond); 2008 Mar; 69(3):152-7. PubMed ID: 18422224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Roles of nuclear cardiology, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance: Noninvasive risk stratification and a conceptual framework for the selection of noninvasive imaging tests in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.
Berman DS; Hachamovitch R; Shaw LJ; Friedman JD; Hayes SW; Thomson LE; Fieno DS; Germano G; Wong ND; Kang X; Rozanski A
J Nucl Med; 2006 Jul; 47(7):1107-18. PubMed ID: 16818945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Noninvasive cardiac imaging.
Mieres JH; Makaryus AN; Redberg RF; Shaw LJ
Am Fam Physician; 2007 Apr; 75(8):1219-28. PubMed ID: 17477105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
