520 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17762808)
1. Vertebral augmentation with a novel Vessel-X bone void filling container system and bioactive bone cement.
Zheng Z; Luk KD; Kuang G; Li Z; Lin J; Lam WM; Cheung KM; Lu WW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Sep; 32(19):2076-82. PubMed ID: 17762808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical comparison of unipedicular versus bipedicular kyphoplasty.
Steinmann J; Tingey CT; Cruz G; Dai Q
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jan; 30(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 15644756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Experimental study of percutaneous vertebroplasty with a novel bone void filling container system].
Wang TP; Zhang KB; Zheng ZM; Liu H; Yu BS
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Apr; 91(15):1041-6. PubMed ID: 21609639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical comparison of kyphoplasty versus a titanium mesh implant with cement for stabilization of vertebral compression fractures.
Upasani VV; Robertson C; Lee D; Tomlinson T; Mahar AT
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Sep; 35(19):1783-8. PubMed ID: 20098352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [CT-based analysis of cement distribution in unipedicular vertebroplasty].
Walz M; Esmer E; Kolbow B
Unfallchirurg; 2006 Nov; 109(11):932-9. PubMed ID: 17066292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical evaluation of calcium phosphate-based nanocomposite versus polymethylmethacrylate cement for percutaneous kyphoplasty.
Lu Q; Liu C; Wang D; Liu H; Yang H; Yang L
Spine J; 2019 Nov; 19(11):1871-1884. PubMed ID: 31202837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of unipedicular and bipedicular kyphoplasty on the stiffness and biomechanical balance of compression fractured vertebrae.
Chen B; Li Y; Xie D; Yang X; Zheng Z
Eur Spine J; 2011 Aug; 20(8):1272-80. PubMed ID: 21384203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical efficacy of unipedicular versus bipedicular vertebroplasty for the management of osteoporotic compression fractures.
Tohmeh AG; Mathis JM; Fenton DC; Levine AM; Belkoff SM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Sep; 24(17):1772-6. PubMed ID: 10488505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Feasibility study of using viscoplastic bone cement for vertebroplasty: an in vivo clinical trial and in vitro cadaveric biomechanical examination.
Lin SW; Chiang CK; Yang CL; Wang JL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 May; 35(10):E385-91. PubMed ID: 20393389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Percutaneous vertebral augmentation: an elevation in adjacent-level fracture risk in kyphoplasty as compared with vertebroplasty.
Frankel BM; Monroe T; Wang C
Spine J; 2007; 7(5):575-82. PubMed ID: 17905320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A biomechanical investigation of vertebroplasty in osteoporotic compression fractures and in prophylactic vertebral reinforcement.
Furtado N; Oakland RJ; Wilcox RK; Hall RM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Aug; 32(17):E480-7. PubMed ID: 17762281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical changes after the augmentation of experimental osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in the cadaveric thoracic spine.
Kayanja MM; Togawa D; Lieberman IH
Spine J; 2005; 5(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 15653085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Risk factors of non-surgical vertebral fracture after percutaneous kyphoplasty of single segment thoracolumbar fracture].
Wu J; Guan YH; Fan SL
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2017 Sep; 30(9):833-837. PubMed ID: 29455485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Unipedicular versus bipedicular percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a prospective randomized study.
Zhang L; Liu Z; Wang J; Feng X; Yang J; Tao Y; Zhang S
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Jun; 16():145. PubMed ID: 26071690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of unipedicular and bipedicular kyphoplasty for treating acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in the lower lumbar spine: a retrospective study.
Qian Y; Li Y; Shen G; Zhong X; Tang C; He S
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 May; 24(1):410. PubMed ID: 37221523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison between radiofrequency targeted vertebral augmentation and balloon kyphoplasty in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures: addressing factors that affect cement extravasation and distribution.
Georgy BA
Pain Physician; 2013; 16(5):E513-8. PubMed ID: 24077201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Vertebroplasty: only small cement volumes are required to normalize stress distributions on the vertebral bodies.
Luo J; Daines L; Charalambous A; Adams MA; Annesley-Williams DJ; Dolan P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Dec; 34(26):2865-73. PubMed ID: 20010394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimal invasive short posterior instrumentation plus balloon kyphoplasty with calcium phosphate for burst and severe compression lumbar fractures.
Korovessis P; Hadjipavlou A; Repantis T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Mar; 33(6):658-67. PubMed ID: 18344860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cement augmentation in a thoracolumbar fracture model: reduction and stability after balloon kyphoplasty versus vertebral body stenting.
Disch AC; Schmoelz W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Sep; 39(19):E1147-53. PubMed ID: 24921850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Kyphoplasty for chronic painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures via unipedicular versus bipedicular approachment: a comparative study in early stage.
Chen C; Chen L; Gu Y; Xu Y; Liu Y; Bai X; Zhu X; Yang H
Injury; 2010 Apr; 41(4):356-9. PubMed ID: 19818957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
