These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17764094)

  • 1. Cost-effective public health guidance: asking questions from the decision-maker's viewpoint.
    Chalkidou K; Culyer A; Naidoo B; Littlejohns P
    Health Econ; 2008 Mar; 17(3):441-8. PubMed ID: 17764094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Principles of good practice for budget impact analysis: report of the ISPOR Task Force on good research practices--budget impact analysis.
    Mauskopf JA; Sullivan SD; Annemans L; Caro J; Mullins CD; Nuijten M; Orlewska E; Watkins J; Trueman P
    Value Health; 2007; 10(5):336-47. PubMed ID: 17888098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How should cost-effectiveness analysis be used in health technology coverage decisions? Evidence from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence approach.
    Williams I; Bryan S; McIver S
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2007 Apr; 12(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 17407655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The use of cost-effectiveness by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE): no(t yet an) exemplar of a deliberative process.
    Schlander M
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Jul; 34(7):534-9. PubMed ID: 18591289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Views of Directors of Public Health about NICE Appraisal Guidance: results of a postal survey. National Institute for Clinical Excellence.
    Davies E; Littlejohns P
    J Public Health Med; 2002 Dec; 24(4):319-25. PubMed ID: 12546211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence and values: paying for end-of-life drugs in the British NHS.
    Chalkidou K
    Health Econ Policy Law; 2012 Oct; 7(4):393-409. PubMed ID: 23079299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Budget impact analysis-principles of good practice: report of the ISPOR 2012 Budget Impact Analysis Good Practice II Task Force.
    Sullivan SD; Mauskopf JA; Augustovski F; Jaime Caro J; Lee KM; Minchin M; Orlewska E; Penna P; Rodriguez Barrios JM; Shau WY
    Value Health; 2014; 17(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 24438712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Generalised cost-effectiveness analysis: an aid to decision making in health.
    Hutubessy RC; Baltussen RM; Torres-Edejer TT; Evans DB
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2002; 1(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 14619255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. After 20 Years of Using Economic Evaluation, Should NICE be Considered a Methods Innovator?
    Sculpher M; Palmer S
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2020 Mar; 38(3):247-257. PubMed ID: 31930460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating 'costs' for cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Miners A
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2008; 26(9):745-51. PubMed ID: 18767895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. NICE and Fair? Health Technology Assessment Policy Under the UK's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 1999-2018.
    Charlton V
    Health Care Anal; 2020 Sep; 28(3):193-227. PubMed ID: 31325000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Public healthcare resource allocation and the Rule of Rescue.
    Cookson R; McCabe C; Tsuchiya A
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Jul; 34(7):540-4. PubMed ID: 18591290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. NICE's social value judgements about equity in health and health care.
    Shah KK; Cookson R; Culyer AJ; Littlejohns P
    Health Econ Policy Law; 2013 Apr; 8(2):145-65. PubMed ID: 22717361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. NICE methodological guidelines and decision making in the National Health Service in England and Wales.
    Gafni A; Birch S; ;
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2003; 21(3):149-57. PubMed ID: 12558466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. NICE's use of cost effectiveness as an exemplar of a deliberative process.
    Culyer AJ
    Health Econ Policy Law; 2006 Jul; 1(Pt 3):299-318. PubMed ID: 18634698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does NICE have a cost-effectiveness threshold and what other factors influence its decisions? A binary choice analysis.
    Devlin N; Parkin D
    Health Econ; 2004 May; 13(5):437-52. PubMed ID: 15127424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The (possible) impact of comparative effectiveness research on pharmaceutical industry decision making.
    Chalkidou K
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2010 Mar; 87(3):264-6. PubMed ID: 20160745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A clinician's guide to cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Detsky AS; Naglie IG
    Ann Intern Med; 1990 Jul; 113(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 2113784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.