BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17764397)

  • 1. Toward a process-based framework for classifying personality tests: comment on Meyer and Kurtz (2006).
    Bornstein RF
    J Pers Assess; 2007 Oct; 89(2):202-7. PubMed ID: 17764397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A memory-systems approach to the classification of personality tests: comment on Meyer and Kurtz (2006).
    Schultheiss OC
    J Pers Assess; 2007 Oct; 89(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 17764396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Beyond "objective" and "projective": a logical system for classifying psychological tests: comment on Meyer and Kurtz (2006).
    Wagner EE
    J Pers Assess; 2008 Jul; 90(4):402-5. PubMed ID: 18584450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Advancing personality assessment terminology: time to retire "objective" and "projective" as personality test descriptors.
    Meyer GJ; Kurtz JE
    J Pers Assess; 2006 Dec; 87(3):223-5. PubMed ID: 17134328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A process dissociation approach to objective-projective test score interrelationships.
    Bornstein RF
    J Pers Assess; 2002 Feb; 78(1):47-68. PubMed ID: 11936212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Using projective tests in forensic psychiatry may lead to wrong conclusions. Only empirically tested tests should be used].
    Trygg L; Dåderman AM; Wiklund N; Meurling AW; Lindgren M; Lidberg L; Levander S
    Lakartidningen; 2001 Jun; 98(26-27):3118-23. PubMed ID: 11478205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [A comment: better standard data are required. No resources for research].
    Boëthius SB
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Jan; 97(1-2):60-2. PubMed ID: 10668334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ethical issues in psychological assessment in school settings.
    Knauss LK
    J Pers Assess; 2001 Oct; 77(2):231-41. PubMed ID: 11693855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Personality assessment and counseling psychology.
    Watkins CE; Campbell VL
    J Pers Assess; 1989; 53(2):296-307. PubMed ID: 2656980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Projective tests and evaluations based on the psychodynamic theory are not reliable].
    Sjöberg L
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Jan; 97(1-2):56-9. PubMed ID: 10668333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Personality assessment among older adults: the value of personality questionnaires unraveled.
    Rossi G; Van den Broeck J; Dierckx E; Segal DL; van Alphen SP
    Aging Ment Health; 2014; 18(8):936-40. PubMed ID: 24960086
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Test equivalence of projective and structured self-concept instruments.
    Stratton JR; Spitzer SP
    J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1966 Oct; 30(5):456-9. PubMed ID: 5339576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Convergence of narcissism measures from the perspective of general personality functioning.
    Samuel DB; Widiger TA
    Assessment; 2008 Sep; 15(3):364-74. PubMed ID: 18310592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of personality tests on state and trait anxiety.
    Newmark CS; Hetzel W; Frerking RA
    J Pers Assess; 1974 Feb; 38(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 4149986
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Introduction to the special section on mixture modeling in personality assessment.
    Wright AG; Hallquist MN
    J Pers Assess; 2014; 96(3):253-5. PubMed ID: 24377414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mixture modeling methods for the assessment of normal and abnormal personality, part I: cross-sectional models.
    Hallquist MN; Wright AG
    J Pers Assess; 2014; 96(3):256-68. PubMed ID: 24134433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Relationship of an evaluation of the status of a human being to the personality characteristics of the person evaluating].
    Lasko MV; Miasnikov VI; Uskov FN; Shendrik VF
    Probl Kosm Biol; 1977; 34():256-66. PubMed ID: 335389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Parental representations and dimensions of personality: empirical relations and assessment implications.
    Pincus AL; Ruiz MA
    J Pers Assess; 1997 Apr; 68(2):436-54. PubMed ID: 9107016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Indigenous measures of personality assessment in Asian countries: a review.
    Cheung FM; Cheung SF; Wada S; Zhang J
    Psychol Assess; 2003 Sep; 15(3):280-9. PubMed ID: 14593828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Note on the definition and ethics of projective tests.
    Schweighofer A; Coles EM
    Percept Mot Skills; 1994 Aug; 79(1 Pt 1):51-4. PubMed ID: 7991332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.