These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17766056)

  • 1. The effects of linear perspective on relative size discrimination in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and humans (Homo sapiens).
    Imura T; Tomonaga M; Yagi A
    Behav Processes; 2008 Mar; 77(3):306-12. PubMed ID: 17766056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Moving shadows contribute to the corridor illusion in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes).
    Imura T; Tomonaga M
    J Comp Psychol; 2009 Aug; 123(3):280-6. PubMed ID: 19685969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Control of the corridor illusion in baboons (Papio papio) by gradient and linear-perspective depth cues.
    Barbet I; Fagot J
    Perception; 2007; 36(3):391-402. PubMed ID: 17455754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The horizon line, linear perspective, interposition, and background brightness as determinants of the magnitude of the pictorial moon illusion.
    Jones SA; Wilson AE
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jan; 71(1):131-42. PubMed ID: 19304603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Vertical position as a cue to pictorial depth: height in the picture plane versus distance to the horizon.
    Gardner JS; Austerweil JL; Palmer SE
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):445-53. PubMed ID: 20139458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perception of depth from shading in infant chimpanzees ( Pan troglodytes).
    Imura T; Tomonaga M
    Anim Cogn; 2003 Dec; 6(4):253-8. PubMed ID: 14610661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Manipulating the strength of the Ponzo and horizontal-vertical illusions through extraction of local cue information.
    Searleman A; Porac C; Alvin J; Peaslee K
    Am J Psychol; 2009; 122(3):383-94. PubMed ID: 19827706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perception of emergent configurations in humans (Homo sapiens) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).
    Goto K; Imura T; Tomonaga M
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Apr; 38(2):125-38. PubMed ID: 22329706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Length judgments in modified Mueller-Lyer figures.
    Predebon J
    Am J Psychol; 1981 Mar; 94(1):159-72. PubMed ID: 7235081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relative numerosity discrimination by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): evidence for approximate numerical representations.
    Tomonaga M
    Anim Cogn; 2008 Jan; 11(1):43-57. PubMed ID: 17443355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and 2-year-old children (Homo sapiens) understand double invisible displacement?
    Collier-Baker E; Suddendorf T
    J Comp Psychol; 2006 May; 120(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 16719586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Depth perception in Pandora's box and size illusion: evolution with age.
    Chevrier J; Delorme A
    Perception; 1983; 12(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 6657424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of grouping abilities in humans (Homo sapiens) and baboons (Papio papio) with the Ebbinghaus illusion.
    Parron C; Fagot J
    J Comp Psychol; 2007 Nov; 121(4):405-11. PubMed ID: 18085924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Looking at perspective pictures from too far, too close, and just right.
    Juricevic I; Kennedy JM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Aug; 135(3):448-61. PubMed ID: 16846274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors contributing to depth perception: behavioral studies on the reverse perspective illusion.
    Cook ND; Yutsudo A; Fujimoto N; Murata M
    Spat Vis; 2008; 21(3-5):397-405. PubMed ID: 18534111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of self-motion on attention in real 3D space.
    Kimura T; Miura T; Doi S; Yamamoto Y
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jul; 131(3):194-201. PubMed ID: 19524213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Further analysis of perception of the standard Müller-Lyer figures in pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens): effects of length of brackets.
    Nakamura N; Watanabe S; Fujita K
    J Comp Psychol; 2009 Aug; 123(3):287-94. PubMed ID: 19685970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do primates see the solitaire illusion differently? A comparative assessment of humans (Homo sapiens), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).
    Agrillo C; Parrish AE; Beran MJ
    J Comp Psychol; 2014 Nov; 128(4):402-13. PubMed ID: 25133464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The performance of bonobos (Pan paniscus), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) in two versions of an object-choice task.
    Mulcahy NJ; Call J
    J Comp Psychol; 2009 Aug; 123(3):304-9. PubMed ID: 19685972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Susceptibility to the Shepard illusion in participants with autism: reduced top-down influences within perception?
    Mitchell P; Mottron L; Soulières I; Ropar D
    Autism Res; 2010 Jun; 3(3):113-9. PubMed ID: 20575110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.