52 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17766921)
1. Contact, moral foundations or knowledge? What predicts attitudes towards women who undergo IVF.
Malina A; Roczniewska M; Pooley JA
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 May; 21(1):346. PubMed ID: 33933010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Acceptance of Elective Single-embryo Transfer in a Resource-limited Setting: A Cross-sectional Questionnaire-based Study.
Jayakumar NP; Solanki M; Karuppusami R; Joseph T; Kunjummen AT; Kamath MS
J Hum Reprod Sci; 2023; 16(3):233-241. PubMed ID: 38045498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The knowledge of the increased risk of complications in multiple pregnancies does not affect the desire to transfer more than one embryo in in vitro fertilisation treatment.
Borges E; Setti AS; Braga DPAF; Melamed RM; Figueira R; Iaconelli A
JBRA Assist Reprod; 2014 Dec; 18(4):144-147. PubMed ID: 35761743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The clinical outcomes of selective and spontaneous fetal reduction of twins to a singleton pregnancy in the first trimester: a retrospective study of 10 years.
Wang C; Tang F; Song B; Li G; Xing Q; Cao Y
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2022 Apr; 20(1):71. PubMed ID: 35459181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is guided, targeted information about the risks of twin pregnancy able to increase the acceptance of single embryo transfer among IVF couples? A prospective study.
Masciovecchio M; Scarafia C; Razzano A; Canosa S; Gennarelli G; Carosso AR; Benedetto C; Revelli A
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2020 Jul; 37(7):1669-1674. PubMed ID: 32440931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of patient education on desire for twins and use of elective single embryo transfer procedures during ART treatment: A systematic review.
Sunderam S; Boulet SL; Jamieson DJ; Kissin DM
Reprod Biomed Soc Online; 2018 Aug; 6():102-119. PubMed ID: 30761357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of single versus double blastocyst transfer on pregnancy outcomes: A prospective, randomized control trial.
Abuzeid OM; Deanna J; Abdelaziz A; Joseph SK; Abuzeid YM; Salem WH; Ashraf M; Abuzeid MI
Facts Views Vis Obgyn; 2017 Dec; 9(4):195-206. PubMed ID: 30250653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Infertile Couples Prefer Twins: Analysis of Their Reasons and Clinical Characteristics Related to This Preference.
Mendoza R; Jáuregui T; Diaz-Nuñez M; de la Sota M; Hidalgo A; Ferrando M; Martínez-Indart L; Expósito A; Matorras R
J Reprod Infertil; 2018; 19(3):167-173. PubMed ID: 30167398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Deciding how many embryos to transfer: ongoing challenges and dilemmas.
Klitzman R
Reprod Biomed Soc Online; 2016 Dec; 3():1-15. PubMed ID: 29541689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Elective single embryo transfer in women less than age 38 years reduces multiple birth rates, but not live birth rates, in United States fertility clinics.
Mancuso AC; Boulet SL; Duran E; Munch E; Kissin DM; Van Voorhis BJ
Fertil Steril; 2016 Oct; 106(5):1107-1114. PubMed ID: 27376458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Desire for Multiple Pregnancy among Patients with Infertility and Their Partners.
Md Latar IL; Razali N
Int J Reprod Med; 2014; 2014():301452. PubMed ID: 25763396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Debating Elective Single Embryo Transfer after in vitro Fertilization: A Plea for a Context-Sensitive Approach.
Ezugwu E; der Burg SV
Ann Med Health Sci Res; 2015; 5(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 25745568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long term costs and effects of reducing the number of twin pregnancies in IVF by single embryo transfer: the TwinSing study.
van Heesch MM; Bonsel GJ; Dumoulin JC; Evers JL; van der Hoeven MA; Severens JL; Dykgraaf RH; van der Veen F; Tonch N; Nelen WL; van Zonneveld P; van Goudoever JB; Tamminga P; Steiner K; Koopman-Esseboom C; van Beijsterveldt CE; Boomsma DI; Snellen D; Dirksen CD
BMC Pediatr; 2010 Oct; 10():75. PubMed ID: 20961411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing patients' and clinicians' perceptions of elective single embryo transfer using the attitudes to a twin IVF pregnancy scale (ATIPS).
Rai V; Betsworth A; Beer C; Ndukwe G; Glazebrook C
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2011 Jan; 28(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 20862535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro fertilization: A private matter becomes public.
Bouzayen R; Eggertson L
CMAJ; 2009 Sep; 181(5):243. PubMed ID: 19720705
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [In vitro fertilization: a private matter becomes public].
Bouzayen R; Eggertson L
CMAJ; 2009 Sep; 181(5):E71-2. PubMed ID: 19720691
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Patient attitudes towards twin pregnancies and single embryo transfer - a questionnaire study.
Højgaard A; Ottosen LD; Kesmodel U; Ingerslev HJ
Hum Reprod; 2007 Oct; 22(10):2673-8. PubMed ID: 17766921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Determinants of the choice for single or double embryo transfer in twin prone couples.
Van Peperstraten AM; Kreuwel IA; Hermens RP; Nelen WL; Van Dop PA; Grol RP; Kremer JA
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(2):226-31. PubMed ID: 18231893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
