These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17767726)

  • 1. Fitness variation in response to artificial selection for reduced cell area, cell number and wing area in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Trotta V; Calboli FC; Ziosi M; Cavicchi S
    BMC Evol Biol; 2007 Aug; 7 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S10. PubMed ID: 17767726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cellular basis of wing size variation in Drosophila melanogaster: a comparison of latitudinal clines on two continents.
    Zwaan BJ; Azevedo RB; James AC; Van 't Land J; Partridge L
    Heredity (Edinb); 2000 Mar; 84 ( Pt 3)():338-47. PubMed ID: 10762404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cellular basis and developmental timing in a size cline of Drosophila melanogaster.
    James AC; Azevedo RB; Partridge L
    Genetics; 1995 Jun; 140(2):659-66. PubMed ID: 7498744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of body-size variation on flight-related traits in latitudinal populations of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Bhan V; Parkash R; Aggarwal DD
    J Genet; 2014 Apr; 93(1):103-12. PubMed ID: 24840827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Developmental constraints and wing shape variation in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Pezzoli MC; Guerra D; Giorgi G; Garoia F; Cavicchi S
    Heredity (Edinb); 1997 Dec; 79 ( Pt 6)():572-7. PubMed ID: 9418265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative analysis of morphological traits among Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans: genetic variability, clines and phenotypic plasticity.
    Gibert P; Capy P; Imasheva A; Moreteau B; Morin JP; Pétavy G; David JR
    Genetica; 2004 Mar; 120(1-3):165-79. PubMed ID: 15088656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Complex constraints on allometry revealed by artificial selection on the wing of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Bolstad GH; Cassara JA; Márquez E; Hansen TF; van der Linde K; Houle D; Pélabon C
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Oct; 112(43):13284-9. PubMed ID: 26371319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lack of response to artificial selection on developmental stability of partial wing shape components in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Tsujino M; Takahashi KH
    Genetica; 2014 Apr; 142(2):177-84. PubMed ID: 24744255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cellular basis of morphological variation and temperature-related plasticity in Drosophila melanogaster strains with divergent wing shapes.
    Torquato LS; Mattos D; Matta BP; Bitner-Mathé BC
    Genetica; 2014 Dec; 142(6):495-505. PubMed ID: 25326715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adaptation and constraint in the evolution of Drosophila melanogaster wing shape.
    Gilchrist AS; Azevedo RB; Partridge L; O'Higgins P
    Evol Dev; 2000; 2(2):114-24. PubMed ID: 11258389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variation in wing length in Eurasian natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Imasheva AG; Bubli OA; Lazebny OE
    Heredity (Edinb); 1994 May; 72 ( Pt 5)():508-14. PubMed ID: 8014061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Direct and correlated responses to artificial selection on developmental time and wing length in Drosophila buzzatii.
    Cortese MD; Norry FM; Piccinali R; Hasson E
    Evolution; 2002 Dec; 56(12):2541-7. PubMed ID: 12583594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evolution of increased larval competitive ability in Drosophila melanogaster without increased larval feeding rate.
    Sarangi M; Nagarajan A; Dey S; Bose J; Joshi A
    J Genet; 2016 Sep; 95(3):491-503. PubMed ID: 27659320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Joint regulation of cell size and cell number in the wing blade of Drosophila melanogaster.
    McCabe J; French V; Partridge L
    Genet Res; 1997 Feb; 69(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 9164175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Similarities and differences in altitudinal versus latitudinal variation for morphological traits in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Klepsatel P; Gáliková M; Huber CD; Flatt T
    Evolution; 2014 May; 68(5):1385-98. PubMed ID: 24410363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Environmental effects on body size variation in Drosophila melanogaster and its cellular basis.
    de Moed GH; De Jong G; Scharloo W
    Genet Res; 1997 Aug; 70(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 9369097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of the genetic basis of wing size divergence in three parallel body size clines of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Gilchrist AS; Partridge L
    Genetics; 1999 Dec; 153(4):1775-87. PubMed ID: 10581284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Polymorphism in the neurofibromin gene, Nf1, is associated with antagonistic selection on wing size and development time in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Lee SF; Eyre-Walker YC; Rane RV; Reuter C; Vinti G; Rako L; Partridge L; Hoffmann AA
    Mol Ecol; 2013 May; 22(10):2716-25. PubMed ID: 23506114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlated responses to selection on body size in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Partridge L; Langelan R; Fowler K; Zwaan B; French V
    Genet Res; 1999 Aug; 74(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 10505406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Parallel effects of the inversion In(3R)Payne on body size across the North American and Australian clines in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Kapun M; Schmidt C; Durmaz E; Schmidt PS; Flatt T
    J Evol Biol; 2016 May; 29(5):1059-72. PubMed ID: 26881839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.