169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17768575)
1. Comparative study of a portable system for prothrombin monitoring using capillary blood against venous blood measurements in patients using oral anticoagulants: correlation and concordance.
Leiria TL; Pellanda LC; Magalhães E; Lima GG
Arq Bras Cardiol; 2007 Jul; 89(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 17768575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Point-of-care monitoring of oral anticoagulation therapy in children. Comparison of the CoaguChek XS system with venous INR and venous INR using an International Reference Thromboplastin preparation (rTF/95).
Greenway A; Ignjatovic V; Summerhayes R; Newall F; Burgess J; DeRosa L; Monagle P
Thromb Haemost; 2009 Jul; 102(1):159-65. PubMed ID: 19572081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Comparison of Quick/INR values of whole capillary blood (CoaguChek Plus) and venous citrate plasma in patients with and without oral anticoagulation].
Burri S; Demarmels Biasiutti F; Lämmle B; Wuillemin WA
Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1998 Oct; 128(44):1723-9. PubMed ID: 9846345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the international normalized ratio levels obtained by portable coagulometer and laboratory in a clinic specializing in oral anticoagulation.
Meneghelo ZM; Barroso CM; Liporace IL; Cora AP
Int J Lab Hematol; 2015 Aug; 37(4):536-43. PubMed ID: 25754527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. INR comparison between the CoaguChek Pro PT(N) and a standard laboratory method.
Khoschnewis S; Hannes FM; Tschopp M; Wuillemin WA
Thromb Res; 2004; 113(5):327-32. PubMed ID: 15183045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. INR comparison between the CoaguChek S and a standard laboratory method among patients with self-management of oral anticoagulation.
Hentrich DP; Fritschi J; Müller PR; Wuillemin WA
Thromb Res; 2007; 119(4):489-95. PubMed ID: 16765423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison and evaluation of a Point-of-care device (CoaguChek XS) to Owren-type prothrombin time assay for monitoring of oral anticoagulant therapy with warfarin.
Wieloch M; Hillarp A; Strandberg K; Nilsson C; Svensson PJ
Thromb Res; 2009 Jul; 124(3):344-8. PubMed ID: 19423152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A modified method of prothrombin time/International Normalised Ratio determination in capillary blood and monitoring oral anticoagulant therapy.
Berkovsky A; Sergeeva EV; Suvorov AV; Uljavova IS; Kachalova ND; Klimovich LG; Samsonova NN; Kozlov AA
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2006; 44(10):1214-7. PubMed ID: 17032133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Self-monitoring of oral anticoagulation therapy in children.
Paioni P; Kroiss S; Kägi E; Bergsträsser E; Fasnacht M; Bauersfeld U; Schmugge M; Albisetti M
Acta Haematol; 2009; 122(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 19816011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of home prothrombin international ratio (PT-INR) management in children with mechanical prosthetic valves - Importance of individual correlations between laboratory and CoaguChek device PT-INRs.
Ino N; Masutani S; Tanikawa S; Iwamoto Y; Saiki H; Ishido H; Tamura M; Senzaki H
J Cardiol; 2018 Feb; 71(2):187-191. PubMed ID: 29066099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of point of care coagulometers compared to reference laboratory measurements in patients on oral anticoagulation therapy.
Dillinger JG; Si Moussi T; Berge N; Bal Dit Sollier C; Henry P; Drouet L
Thromb Res; 2016 Apr; 140():66-72. PubMed ID: 26901852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validity of CoaguChek S for home monitoring of anticoagulant therapy in pediatrics.
Hill J; Perreault S; Dorval M
Can J Cardiol; 2007 Jan; 23(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 17245482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CoaguChek® XS versus standard laboratory prothrombin time for anticoagulant monitoring in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome.
Fonseca MES; Balbi GGM; Signorelli F; Gouvea CP; de Andrade DCO
Lupus; 2022 Apr; 31(5):565-574. PubMed ID: 35266798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the INR Values Measured by CoaguChek XS Coagulometer and Conventional Laboratory Methods in Patients on VKA Therapy.
Kalçık M; Yesin M; Gürsoy MO; Gündüz S; Karakoyun S; Astarcıoğlu MA; Bayam E; Cerşit S; Özkan M
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost; 2017 Mar; 23(2):187-194. PubMed ID: 26177662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative study of two portable systems for oral anticoagulant monitoring.
Vacas M; Lafuente PJ; Unanue I; Iriarte JA
Hematol J; 2004; 5(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 14745428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Self-management of oral anticoagulants with a whole blood prothrombin-time monitor in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation.
Eldor A; Schwartz J
Pathophysiol Haemost Thromb; 2002; 32(3):99-106. PubMed ID: 12372921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability of International Normalized Ratio Results in the CoaguChek Pro II System in a Clinical Setting.
Cortina-de-la-Rosa E; Izaguirre-Ávila R; Ramírez-Hernández A; Romero-Arroyo MO; Cortés-Cortés K
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost; 2023; 29():10760296231216451. PubMed ID: 38018118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance of a point-of-care device in determining prothrombin time in an anticoagulation clinic.
Colella MP; Fiusa MM; Orsi FL; de Paula EV; Annichino-Bizzacchi JM
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis; 2012 Mar; 23(2):172-4. PubMed ID: 22246165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance evaluation of the new CoaguChek XS system compared with the established CoaguChek system by patients experienced in INR-self management.
Braun S; Watzke H; Hasenkam JM; Schwab M; Wolf T; Dovifat C; Völler H
Thromb Haemost; 2007 Feb; 97(2):310-4. PubMed ID: 17264962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Results of the performance verification of the CoaguChek XS system.
Plesch W; Wolf T; Breitenbeck N; Dikkeschei LD; Cervero A; Perez PL; van den Besselaar AM
Thromb Res; 2008; 123(2):381-9. PubMed ID: 18585761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
