These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1778052)

  • 21. Removing muscle and eye artifacts using blind source separation techniques in ictal EEG source imaging.
    Hallez H; De Vos M; Vanrumste B; Van Hese P; Assecondi S; Van Laere K; Dupont P; Van Paesschen W; Van Huffel S; Lemahieu I
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Jul; 120(7):1262-72. PubMed ID: 19539525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effects of ocular artifacts on (lateralized) broadband power in the EEG.
    Hagemann D; Naumann E
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2001 Feb; 112(2):215-31. PubMed ID: 11165523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Removal of ocular artifacts from EEG using adaptive thresholding of wavelet coefficients.
    Krishnaveni V; Jayaraman S; Anitha L; Ramadoss K
    J Neural Eng; 2006 Dec; 3(4):338-46. PubMed ID: 17124338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Combined MEG and EEG source imaging by minimization of mutual information.
    Baillet S; Garnero L; Marin G; Hugonin JP
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1999 May; 46(5):522-34. PubMed ID: 10230131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Source analysis of EEG oscillations using high-resolution EEG and MEG.
    Srinivasan R; Winter WR; Nunez PL
    Prog Brain Res; 2006; 159():29-42. PubMed ID: 17071222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Extraction of ocular artefacts from EEG using independent component analysis.
    Vigário RN
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1997 Sep; 103(3):395-404. PubMed ID: 9305288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The deleterious effect of ocular artefacts on the quantitative EEG, and a remedy.
    Gasser T; Ziegler P; Gattaz WF
    Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 1992; 241(6):352-6. PubMed ID: 1504112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Eye movements explain decodability during perception and cued attention in MEG.
    Quax SC; Dijkstra N; van Staveren MJ; Bosch SE; van Gerven MAJ
    Neuroimage; 2019 Jul; 195():444-453. PubMed ID: 30951848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Magnetoencephalography is more successful for screening and localizing frontal lobe epilepsy than electroencephalography.
    Ossenblok P; de Munck JC; Colon A; Drolsbach W; Boon P
    Epilepsia; 2007 Nov; 48(11):2139-49. PubMed ID: 17662061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. EEG and MEG: forward solutions for inverse methods.
    Mosher JC; Leahy RM; Lewis PS
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1999 Mar; 46(3):245-59. PubMed ID: 10097460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation.
    Jung TP; Makeig S; Humphries C; Lee TW; McKeown MJ; Iragui V; Sejnowski TJ
    Psychophysiology; 2000 Mar; 37(2):163-78. PubMed ID: 10731767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Anatomically constrained dipole adjustment (ANACONDA) for accurate MEG/EEG focal source localizations.
    Im CH; Jung HK; Fujimaki N
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(20):4931-53. PubMed ID: 16204881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. EEG and MEG: sensitivity to epileptic spike activity as function of source orientation and depth.
    Hunold A; Funke ME; Eichardt R; Stenroos M; Haueisen J
    Physiol Meas; 2016 Jul; 37(7):1146-62. PubMed ID: 27328313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A random dipole model for spontaneous brain activity.
    de Munck JC; Vijn PC; Lopes da Silva FH
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1992 Aug; 39(8):791-804. PubMed ID: 1505993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Dipole models for the EEG and MEG.
    Schimpf PH; Ramon C; Haueisen J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 May; 49(5):409-18. PubMed ID: 12002172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An evaluation of EEG ocular artifact removal with a multi-channel wiener filter based on probabilistic generative model.
    Maki H; Toda T; Sakti S; Neubig G; Nakamura S
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015 Aug; 2015():2775-8. PubMed ID: 26736867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Direct reconstruction algorithm of current dipoles for vector magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography.
    Nara T; Oohama J; Hashimoto M; Takeda T; Ando S
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3859-79. PubMed ID: 17664582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. EEG versus MEG localization accuracy: theory and experiment.
    Cohen D; Cuffin BN
    Brain Topogr; 1991; 4(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 1793693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Estimation of hyper-parameters for a hierarchical model of combined cortical and extra-brain current sources in the MEG inverse problem.
    Morishige K; Yoshioka T; Kawawaki D; Hiroe N; Sato MA; Kawato M
    Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 101():320-36. PubMed ID: 25034620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reference layer artefact subtraction (RLAS): a novel method of minimizing EEG artefacts during simultaneous fMRI.
    Chowdhury ME; Mullinger KJ; Glover P; Bowtell R
    Neuroimage; 2014 Jan; 84():307-19. PubMed ID: 23994127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.