These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1778055)

  • 21. Current dipole localization with an ideal magnetometer system.
    Lütkenhöner B
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1996 Nov; 43(11):1049-61. PubMed ID: 9214823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of the amplitude/intensity function of the auditory evoked N1m and N1 components.
    Neukirch M; Hegerl U; Kötitz R; Dorn H; Gallinat J; Herrmann WM
    Neuropsychobiology; 2002; 45(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 11803241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influence of head model in biomagnetic source localization.
    Tomita S; Kajihara S; Kondo Y; Yoshida Y; Shibata K; Kado H
    Brain Topogr; 1996; 8(3):337-40. PubMed ID: 8728429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Signal Space Separation Method for a Biomagnetic Sensor Array Arranged on a Flat Plane for Magnetocardiographic Applications: A Computer Simulation Study.
    Sekihara K
    J Healthc Eng; 2018; 2018():7689589. PubMed ID: 29854364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Magnetoencephalographic accuracy profiles for the detection of auditory pathway sources.
    Bauer M; Trahms L; Sander T
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2015 Apr; 60(2):135-45. PubMed ID: 25490026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Surface-source modeling and estimation using biomagnetic measurements.
    Yetik IS; Nehorai A; Muravchik CH; Haueisen J; Eiselt M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Oct; 53(10):1872-82. PubMed ID: 17019850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of measurement conditions on MCG inverse solutions.
    Tan GA; Brauer F; Stroink G; Purcell CJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1992 Sep; 39(9):921-7. PubMed ID: 1473820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. MEG recordings of DC fields using the signal space separation method (SSS).
    Taulu S; Simola J; Kajola M
    Neurol Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Nov; 2004():35. PubMed ID: 16012635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Tangential derivative mapping of axial MEG applied to event-related desynchronization research.
    Bastiaansen MC; Knösche TR
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2000 Jul; 111(7):1300-5. PubMed ID: 10880806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Similarities and differences between on-scalp and conventional in-helmet magnetoencephalography recordings.
    Andersen LM; Oostenveld R; Pfeiffer C; Ruffieux S; Jousmäki V; Hämäläinen M; Schneiderman JF; Lundqvist D
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0178602. PubMed ID: 28742118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Improving source reconstructions by combining bioelectric and biomagnetic data.
    Fuchs M; Wagner M; Wischmann HA; Köhler T; Theissen A; Drenckhahn R; Buchner H
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1998 Aug; 107(2):93-111. PubMed ID: 9751281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The 3D topography of MEG source localization accuracy: effects of conductor model and noise.
    Tarkiainen A; Liljeström M; Seppä M; Salmelin R
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2003 Oct; 114(10):1977-92. PubMed ID: 14499760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Spatial filters based on independent component analysis for magnetic noise reduction in the magnetocardiogram.
    Lee HN; Park TS; Lee SY; Huh Y
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2004 Jul; 42(4):532-4. PubMed ID: 15320463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Direct reconstruction algorithm of current dipoles for vector magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography.
    Nara T; Oohama J; Hashimoto M; Takeda T; Ando S
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3859-79. PubMed ID: 17664582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The impact of MEG source reconstruction method on source-space connectivity estimation: A comparison between minimum-norm solution and beamforming.
    Hincapié AS; Kujala J; Mattout J; Pascarella A; Daligault S; Delpuech C; Mery D; Cosmelli D; Jerbi K
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():29-42. PubMed ID: 28479475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Signal-to-noise ratio of the MEG signal after preprocessing.
    Gonzalez-Moreno A; Aurtenetxe S; Lopez-Garcia ME; del Pozo F; Maestu F; Nevado A
    J Neurosci Methods; 2014 Jan; 222():56-61. PubMed ID: 24200506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Improved procedure for neuromagnetic localisation.
    Pistella F; Barone P; Narici L; Ocello N; Pizzella V; Romani GL
    Phys Med Biol; 1987 Jan; 32(1):115-20. PubMed ID: 3823130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence of head tissue conductivity in forward and inverse magnetoencephalographic simulations using realistic head models.
    Van Uitert R; Johnson C; Zhukov L
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Dec; 51(12):2129-37. PubMed ID: 15605860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Fetal MCG and fetal MEG measurements with a 3-channel SQUID system.
    Schneider U; Giessler F; Nowak H; Logemann T; Grimm B; Haueisen J; Schleussner E
    Neurol Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Nov; 2004():65. PubMed ID: 16012661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Magnetoencephalography and its Achilles' heel.
    Lütkenhöner B
    J Physiol Paris; 2003; 97(4-6):641-58. PubMed ID: 15242672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.