These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

36 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17783280)

  • 1. Security Checks on USDA Peer Reviewers.
    Marshall E
    Science; 1982 May; 216(4546):600. PubMed ID: 17783280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Block Ends Checks on USDA Peer Panels.
    Marshall E
    Science; 1982 Jun; 216(4550):1085. PubMed ID: 17808471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How do peer reviewers of journal articles perform? Evaluating the reviewers with a sham paper.
    Kumar PD
    J Assoc Physicians India; 1999 Feb; 47(2):198-200. PubMed ID: 10999090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Peer reviewer training and editor support: results from an international survey of nursing peer reviewers.
    Freda MC; Kearney MH; Baggs JG; Broome ME; Dougherty M
    J Prof Nurs; 2009; 25(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 19306833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Grant application and review procedures of the National Institute of Handicapped Research: survey of applicant and peer reviewer opinions.
    Fuhrer MJ; Grabois M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1985 May; 66(5):318-21. PubMed ID: 3159374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Survey of conflict-of-interest disclosure policies of ophthalmology journals.
    Anraku A; Jin YP; Trope GE; Buys YM
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1093-6. PubMed ID: 19376583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Guide for peer reviewers of scientific articles in the Croatian Medical Journal.
    Marusić M; Sambunjak D; Marusić A
    Croat Med J; 2005 Apr; 46(2):326-32. PubMed ID: 15849858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. External feedback in general practice: a focus group study of trained peer reviewers of significant event analyses.
    McKay J; Pope L; Bowie P; Lough M
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Feb; 15(1):142-7. PubMed ID: 19239594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of cardiovascular grant-in-aid applications by peer review: influence of internal and external reviewers and committees.
    Hodgson C
    Can J Cardiol; 1995 Nov; 11(10):864-8. PubMed ID: 7489524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Guide for peer reviewers of scientific article].
    Marusić M; Sambunjak D; Marusić A
    Lijec Vjesn; 2005; 127(5-6):107-11. PubMed ID: 16281469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Editors' requests of peer reviewers: a study and a proposal.
    Frank E
    Prev Med; 1996; 25(2):102-4. PubMed ID: 8860274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does exchanging comments of Indian and non-Indian reviewers improve the quality of manuscript reviews?
    Das Sinha S; Sahni P; Nundy S
    Natl Med J India; 1999; 12(5):210-3. PubMed ID: 10613000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reviewers' perceptions of the peer review process for a medical education journal.
    Snell L; Spencer J
    Med Educ; 2005 Jan; 39(1):90-7. PubMed ID: 15612905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A peer review review.
    Wencel S
    Wis Med J; 1989 Sep; 88(9):27-32, 35. PubMed ID: 2588651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. USDA Official Defends Loyalty Checks.
    Marshall E
    Science; 1982 Jun; 216(4553):1391. PubMed ID: 17798352
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Marital conflict and the quality of young children's peer play behavior: the mediating and moderating role of parent-child emotional reciprocity and attachment security.
    Lindsey EW; Caldera YM; Tankersley L
    J Fam Psychol; 2009 Apr; 23(2):130-45. PubMed ID: 19364208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Peer review in the Croatian Medical Journal from 1992 to 1996.
    Marusić A; Mestrović T; Petrovecki M; Marusić M
    Croat Med J; 1998 Mar; 39(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 9475799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Blinding in peer review: the preferences of reviewers for nursing journals.
    Baggs JG; Broome ME; Dougherty MC; Freda MC; Kearney MH
    J Adv Nurs; 2008 Oct; 64(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 18764847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Homeland security. NASA lab workers decry new security checks.
    Bhattacharjee Y
    Science; 2007 Jul; 317(5834):31. PubMed ID: 17615314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Encouragement to contribute to peer-review process in clinical neurology journals.
    Asano E; Sunbulli M; Aljabi F; Asano Y
    Brain Dev; 2007 Mar; 29(2):98-101. PubMed ID: 16935447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.