These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1778365)

  • 1. The noninvasive mouse ear swelling assay. I. Refinements for detecting weak contact sensitizers.
    Thorne PS; Hawk C; Kaliszewski SD; Guiney PD
    Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1991 Nov; 17(4):790-806. PubMed ID: 1778365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The noninvasive mouse ear swelling assay. II. Testing the contact sensitizing potency of fragrances.
    Thorne PS; Hawk C; Kaliszewski SD; Guiney PD
    Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1991 Nov; 17(4):807-20. PubMed ID: 1778366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of a radioisotopic incorporation method and the mouse ear swelling test (MEST) for contact sensitivity to weak sensitizers.
    Cornacoff JB; House RV; Dean JH
    Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1988 Jan; 10(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 3350228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimization of the mouse ear swelling test for in vivo and in vitro studies of weak contact sensitizers.
    Garrigue JL; Nicolas JF; Fraginals R; Benezra C; Bour H; Schmitt D
    Contact Dermatitis; 1994 Apr; 30(4):231-7. PubMed ID: 8033550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acute stress modulates the irritant component of sensitizers in allergic contact dermatitis: implications for exposure assessment.
    Flint MS; Salmen RR; Brumbaugh K; Tinkle SS
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2003 Apr; 188(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 12668122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimization of an in vitro lymphocyte blastogenesis assay for predictive assessment of immunologic responsiveness to contact sensitizers.
    Robinson MK
    J Invest Dermatol; 1989 Jun; 92(6):860-7. PubMed ID: 2723450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contact hypersensitivity reactions to dinitrofluorobenzene mediated by monoclonal IgE anti-DNP antibodies.
    Ray MC; Tharp MD; Sullivan TJ; Tigelaar RE
    J Immunol; 1983 Sep; 131(3):1096-102. PubMed ID: 6193174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contact sensitivity by diisocyanates: potencies and cross-reactivities.
    Thorne PS; Hillebrand JA; Lewis GR; Karol MH
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 1987 Jan; 87(1):155-65. PubMed ID: 3798450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Allopurinol increases ear swelling and mortality in a dinitrofluorobenzene-induced contact hypersensitivity mouse model.
    Horiuchi H; Ota M; Kitahara S; Ohta T; Kiyoki M; Komoriya K
    Biol Pharm Bull; 1999 Aug; 22(8):810-5. PubMed ID: 10480318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neuropeptide modulation of chemically induced skin irritation.
    Veronesi B; Sailstad DM; Doerfler DL; Selgrade M
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 1995 Dec; 135(2):258-67. PubMed ID: 8545836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of a flow cytometry assay for the identification and differentiation of chemicals with the potential to elicit irritation, IgE-mediated, or T cell-mediated hypersensitivity responses.
    Manetz TS; Meade BJ
    Toxicol Sci; 1999 Apr; 48(2):206-17. PubMed ID: 10353312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Production of TNF-alpha by skin explants of dinitrochlorobenzene-challenged ears in rats: a model for the evaluation of contact hypersensitivity.
    Kataranovski M; Kandolf-Sekulović L; Milosavljević I
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2002; 59(6):581-6. PubMed ID: 12557614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of the magnitude of sensitization dose on the incidence and intensity of CHS to dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB): insight from ear swelling and challenged-skin draining lymph node response in rats.
    Popov A; Mirkov I; Vasilijic S; Zolotarevski L; Kataranovski D; Kataranovski M
    J Immunotoxicol; 2013; 10(4):355-60. PubMed ID: 23614785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A quantitative approach to assess the potency of skin sensitizers in the elicitation phase.
    Ezendam J; Vermeulen JP; de Klerk A; de Jong WH; van Loveren H
    Toxicology; 2012 Sep; 299(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 22564262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A murine model for low molecular weight chemicals: differentiation of respiratory sensitizers (TMA) from contact sensitizers (DNFB).
    Sailstad DM; Ward MD; Boykin EH; Selgrade MK
    Toxicology; 2003 Dec; 194(1-2):147-61. PubMed ID: 14636703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neuropeptide denervation alters both the elicitation and induction phases of contact hypersensitivity in mice.
    Veronesi B; Williams WC; Smialowicz RJ; Sailstad DM; Doerfler D; Selgrade MJ
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 1998 Dec; 153(2):243-9. PubMed ID: 9878594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contact sensitivity to captafol in BALB/c mice.
    Cushman JR; Street JC
    Contact Dermatitis; 1991 May; 24(5):363-5. PubMed ID: 1893688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Utilization of the ex vivo LLNA: BrdU-ELISA to distinguish the sensitizers from irritants in respect of 3 end points-lymphocyte proliferation, ear swelling, and cytokine profiles.
    Arancioglu S; Ulker OC; Karakaya A
    Int J Toxicol; 2015; 34(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 25563296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Investigating the roles of regulatory T cells, mast cells and interleukin-9 in the control of skin inflammation by vitamin D.
    Gorman S; Geldenhuys S; Weeden CE; Grimbaldeston MA; Hart PH
    Arch Dermatol Res; 2018 Apr; 310(3):221-230. PubMed ID: 29392411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rutin suppresses atopic dermatitis and allergic contact dermatitis.
    Choi JK; Kim SH
    Exp Biol Med (Maywood); 2013 Apr; 238(4):410-7. PubMed ID: 23760007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.