These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1778366)

  • 1. The noninvasive mouse ear swelling assay. II. Testing the contact sensitizing potency of fragrances.
    Thorne PS; Hawk C; Kaliszewski SD; Guiney PD
    Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1991 Nov; 17(4):807-20. PubMed ID: 1778366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The noninvasive mouse ear swelling assay. I. Refinements for detecting weak contact sensitizers.
    Thorne PS; Hawk C; Kaliszewski SD; Guiney PD
    Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1991 Nov; 17(4):790-806. PubMed ID: 1778365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of a radioisotopic incorporation method and the mouse ear swelling test (MEST) for contact sensitivity to weak sensitizers.
    Cornacoff JB; House RV; Dean JH
    Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1988 Jan; 10(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 3350228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Skin sensitization potency of isoeugenol and its dimers evaluated by a non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay and guinea pig maximization test.
    Takeyoshi M; Iida K; Suzuki K; Yamazaki S
    J Appl Toxicol; 2008 May; 28(4):530-4. PubMed ID: 17929237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contact sensitivity by diisocyanates: potencies and cross-reactivities.
    Thorne PS; Hillebrand JA; Lewis GR; Karol MH
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 1987 Jan; 87(1):155-65. PubMed ID: 3798450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A review of the Buehler guinea pig skin sensitization test and its use in a risk assessment process for human skin sensitization.
    Robinson MK; Nusair TL; Fletcher ER; Ritz HL
    Toxicology; 1990 Apr; 61(2):91-107. PubMed ID: 2181736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimization of the mouse ear swelling test for in vivo and in vitro studies of weak contact sensitizers.
    Garrigue JL; Nicolas JF; Fraginals R; Benezra C; Bour H; Schmitt D
    Contact Dermatitis; 1994 Apr; 30(4):231-7. PubMed ID: 8033550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enhanced sensitization and elicitation responses caused by mixtures of common fragrance allergens.
    Bonefeld CM; Nielsen MM; Rubin IM; Vennegaard MT; Dabelsteen S; Gimenéz-Arnau E; Lepoittevin JP; Geisler C; Johansen JD
    Contact Dermatitis; 2011 Dec; 65(6):336-42. PubMed ID: 21767274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of the risk of respiratory sensitization from fragrance allergens released by air fresheners.
    ter Burg W; Bouma K; Schakel DJ; Wijnhoven SW; van Engelen J; van Loveren H; Ezendam J
    Inhal Toxicol; 2014 Apr; 26(5):310-8. PubMed ID: 24640966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sensitization to fragrance materials in Indonesian cosmetics.
    Roesyanto-Mahadi ID; Geursen-Reitsma AM; van Joost T; van den Akker TW
    Contact Dermatitis; 1990 Apr; 22(4):212-7. PubMed ID: 2347175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adverse reactions to fragrances. A clinical review.
    de Groot AC; Frosch PJ
    Contact Dermatitis; 1997 Feb; 36(2):57-86. PubMed ID: 9062742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Reactions to fragrances and textiles].
    Hausen BM
    Z Hautkr; 1987 Dec; 62(23):1649-52, 1655-6. PubMed ID: 3326311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of the ability of mice fed on vitamin A supplemented diet to respond to a variety of potential contact sensitizers.
    Maisey J; Miller K
    Contact Dermatitis; 1986 Jul; 15(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 3757498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of dose-response data to compare the skin sensitizing abilities of dicyclohexylmethane-4,4'-diisocyanate and picryl chloride in two animal species.
    Stadler JC; Karol MH
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 1985 May; 78(3):445-50. PubMed ID: 4049393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contact sensitivity to Tinuvin P in mice.
    Ikarashi Y; Tsuchiya T; Nakamura A
    Contact Dermatitis; 1994 Apr; 30(4):226-30. PubMed ID: 8033549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Utilization of the ex vivo LLNA: BrdU-ELISA to distinguish the sensitizers from irritants in respect of 3 end points-lymphocyte proliferation, ear swelling, and cytokine profiles.
    Arancioglu S; Ulker OC; Karakaya A
    Int J Toxicol; 2015; 34(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 25563296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative sensitizing potencies of fragrances, preservatives, and hair dyes.
    Lidén C; Yazar K; Johansen JD; Karlberg AT; Uter W; White IR
    Contact Dermatitis; 2016 Nov; 75(5):265-275. PubMed ID: 27633650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Contact allergy to fragrances].
    Kieć-Swierczyńska M; Krecisz B; Swierczyńska-Machura D
    Med Pr; 2006; 57(5):431-7. PubMed ID: 17340985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Final report on the safety assessment of capsicum annuum extract, capsicum annuum fruit extract, capsicum annuum resin, capsicum annuum fruit powder, capsicum frutescens fruit, capsicum frutescens fruit extract, capsicum frutescens resin, and capsaicin.
    Int J Toxicol; 2007; 26 Suppl 1():3-106. PubMed ID: 17365137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development and validation of an alternative dermal sensitization test: the mouse ear swelling test (MEST).
    Gad SC; Dunn BJ; Dobbs DW; Reilly C; Walsh RD
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 1986 Jun; 84(1):93-114. PubMed ID: 3715870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.