These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

827 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17784880)

  • 21. Length of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy as a predictor of biochemical recurrence.
    Shikanov S; Song J; Royce C; Al-Ahmadie H; Zorn K; Steinberg G; Zagaja G; Shalhav A; Eggener S
    J Urol; 2009 Jul; 182(1):139-44. PubMed ID: 19450829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Can perineural invasion on prostate needle biopsy predict prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy?
    de la Taille A; Rubin MA; Bagiella E; Olsson CA; Buttyan R; Burchardt T; Knight C; O'Toole KM; Katz AE
    J Urol; 1999 Jul; 162(1):103-6. PubMed ID: 10379750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Predictors of prostate-specific antigen progression among men with seminal vesicle invasion at the time of radical prostatectomy.
    Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Presti JC; Amling CL; Terris MK; Trock B; Kane CJ
    Cancer; 2004 Apr; 100(8):1633-8. PubMed ID: 15073850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The prognostic role of the pathological T2 subclassification for prostate cancer in the 2002 Tumour-Nodes-Metastasis staging system.
    van Oort IM; Witjes JA; Kok DE; Kiemeney LA; Hulsbergen-Van De Kaa CA
    BJU Int; 2008 Aug; 102(4):438-41. PubMed ID: 18336608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: do they have an impact on biochemical or clinical progression?
    Pfitzenmaier J; Pahernik S; Tremmel T; Haferkamp A; Buse S; Hohenfellner M
    BJU Int; 2008 Nov; 102(10):1413-8. PubMed ID: 18537951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Subclassification of clinical stage T1 prostate cancer: impact on biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.
    Magheli A; Rais-Bahrami S; Carter HB; Peck HJ; Epstein JI; Gonzalgo ML
    J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1277-80; discussion 1280-1. PubMed ID: 17698121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Pathological findings and prostate-specific antigen outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer.
    Ploussard G; Salomon L; Allory Y; Terry S; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; Vacherot F; de la Taille A
    BJU Int; 2010 Jul; 106(1):86-90. PubMed ID: 19930177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Oncological control after radical prostatectomy in men with clinical T3 prostate cancer: a single-centre experience.
    Xylinas E; Drouin SJ; Comperat E; Vaessen C; Renard-Penna R; Misrai V; Bitker MO; Chartier-Kastler E; Richard F; Cussenot O; Roupret M
    BJU Int; 2009 May; 103(9):1173-8; discussion 1178. PubMed ID: 19040530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Outcome of patients with Gleason score 8 or higher prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy alone.
    Mian BM; Troncoso P; Okihara K; Bhadkamkar V; Johnston D; Reyes AO; Babaian RJ
    J Urol; 2002 Apr; 167(4):1675-80. PubMed ID: 11912386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy among men with normal preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen levels.
    Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Kane CJ; Terris MK; Presti JC; Trock B; Amling CL
    Cancer; 2004 Aug; 101(4):748-53. PubMed ID: 15305405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Tertiary Gleason pattern 5 is a powerful predictor of biochemical relapse in patients with Gleason score 7 prostatic adenocarcinoma.
    Hattab EM; Koch MO; Eble JN; Lin H; Cheng L
    J Urol; 2006 May; 175(5):1695-9; discussion 1699. PubMed ID: 16600733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Validity of the CAPRA score to predict biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy. Results from a european multicenter survey of 1,296 patients.
    May M; Knoll N; Siegsmund M; Fahlenkamp D; Vogler H; Hoschke B; Gralla O
    J Urol; 2007 Nov; 178(5):1957-62; discussion 1962. PubMed ID: 17868719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Radical prostatectomy for incidental (stage T1a-T1b) prostate cancer: analysis of predictors for residual disease and biochemical recurrence.
    Capitanio U; Scattoni V; Freschi M; Briganti A; Salonia A; Gallina A; Colombo R; Karakiewicz PI; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
    Eur Urol; 2008 Jul; 54(1):118-25. PubMed ID: 18314255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prognostic value of surgical margin status for biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.
    Hashimoto K; Masumori N; Takei F; Fukuta F; Takahashi A; Itoh N; Hasegawa T; Tsukamoto T
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2008 Jan; 38(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 18203710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Defining pathological variables to predict biochemical failure in patients with positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy: implications for adjuvant radiotherapy.
    Resnick MJ; Canter DJ; Guzzo TJ; Magerfleisch L; Tomaszewski JE; Brucker BM; Bergey MR; Sonnad SS; Wein AJ; Malkowicz SB
    BJU Int; 2010 May; 105(10):1377-80. PubMed ID: 19888981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Does year of radical prostatectomy independently predict outcome in prostate cancer?
    Mitchell RE; Shah JB; Olsson CA; Benson MC; McKiernan JM
    Urology; 2006 Feb; 67(2):368-72. PubMed ID: 16461087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Significance of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in Gleason score 7 radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Whittemore DE; Hick EJ; Carter MR; Moul JW; Miranda-Sousa AJ; Sexton WJ
    J Urol; 2008 Feb; 179(2):516-22; discussion 522. PubMed ID: 18076949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Invasion of seminal vesicles by adenocarcinoma of the prostate: PSA outcome determined by preoperative and postoperative factors.
    Bloom KD; Richie JP; Schultz D; Renshaw A; Saegaert T; D'amico AV
    Urology; 2004 Feb; 63(2):333-6. PubMed ID: 14972484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Should we replace the Gleason score with the amount of high-grade prostate cancer?
    Vis AN; Roemeling S; Kranse R; Schröder FH; van der Kwast TH
    Eur Urol; 2007 Apr; 51(4):931-9. PubMed ID: 16935413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
    Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 42.