381 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17785034)
1. The petty crimes perpetuated by academia: scientific literature's death by a thousand cuts.
Slade E; Tamber PS
Menopause Int; 2007 Sep; 13(3):95-7. PubMed ID: 17785034
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Should journals police scientific fraud?
Marris E
Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7076):520-1. PubMed ID: 16452946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Doctor admits Lancet study is fiction.
Marris E
Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7074):248-9. PubMed ID: 16421528
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Journals: redundant publications are bad news.
Mojon-Azzi SM; Jiang X; Wagner U; Mojon DS
Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6920):209. PubMed ID: 12529610
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Penalties plus high-quality review to fight plagiarism.
Wittmaack K
Nature; 2005 Jul; 436(7047):24. PubMed ID: 16001039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Standards for ethical publication.
Johnson JT; Niparko JK; Levine PA; Kennedy DW; Rudy SF; Weber P; Weber RS; Benninger MS; Rosenfeld RM; Ruben RJ; Smith RJ; Sataloff RT; Weir N
Am J Otolaryngol; 2007; 28(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 17162121
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Behind the scenes of scientific articles: defining categories of fraud and regulating cases].
Pontille D; Torny D
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2012 Aug; 60(4):247-53. PubMed ID: 22819062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. On cloning research, peer review and the possibility of fraud.
Carrió I
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2006 Mar; 33(3):235-6. PubMed ID: 16477432
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The trouble with replication.
Giles J
Nature; 2006 Jul; 442(7101):344-7. PubMed ID: 16871184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Scientific misconduct, stem cells, and the way ahead.
Lindblad WJ
Wound Repair Regen; 2006; 14(2):101. PubMed ID: 16630096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Retractions' realities.
Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6927):1. PubMed ID: 12621394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Scientific misconduct.
Sundaram M; Rosenthal DI; Hodler J
Skeletal Radiol; 2007 Mar; 36(3):179. PubMed ID: 17205322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Korean scandal will have global fallout.
Check E; Cyranoski D
Nature; 2005 Dec; 438(7071):1056-7. PubMed ID: 16371963
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Bad peer reviewers.
Nature; 2001 Sep; 413(6852):93. PubMed ID: 11557930
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Journals should set a new standard in transparency.
Dellavalle RP; Lundahl K; Freeman SR; Schilling LM
Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7126):364. PubMed ID: 17251958
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The availability of original data and statistics: an improvement in good publication practice.
Morselli-Labate AM
JOP; 2003 Nov; 4(6):193-9. PubMed ID: 14614199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Peers under pressure.
Dalton R
Nature; 2001 Sep; 413(6852):102-4. PubMed ID: 11557944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Without scientific integrity, there can be no evidence base.
Jette AM
Phys Ther; 2005 Nov; 85(11):1122-3. PubMed ID: 16253041
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The manuscript review process.
Triadafilopoulos G
Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Dec; 64(6 Suppl):S23-5. PubMed ID: 17113850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Investigation of scientific fraud. Statements from the Swedish Research Council not sufficiently normative].
Werkö L
Lakartidningen; 2006 Oct 25-31; 103(43):3288-91. PubMed ID: 17117661
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
