78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17785305)
1. Diagnosing diseases by measurement of electrical skin impedance: a novel technique.
Weitzen R; Epstein N; Shoenfeld Y; Zimlichman E
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2007 Aug; 1109():185-92. PubMed ID: 17785305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measurement of electrical skin impedance of dermal-visceral zones as a diagnostic tool for inner organ pathologies: a blinded preliminary evaluation of a new technique.
Zimlichman E; Lahad A; Aron-Maor A; Kanevsky A; Shoenfeld Y
Isr Med Assoc J; 2005 Oct; 7(10):631-4. PubMed ID: 16259341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measurement of electrical skin impedance of dermal-visceral zones as a diagnostic tool for disorders of the immune system.
Gerosa M; Zimlichman E; Ventura D; Fanelli V; Riboldi P; Meroni PL
Lupus; 2006; 15(7):457-61. PubMed ID: 16898182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Medex test, a novel modality for liver disease diagnosis: a pilot study.
Lurie Y; Landau DA; Kanevsky A; Pel S; Zelber-Sagie S; Oren R
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2007 Aug; 41(7):700-5. PubMed ID: 17667055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measurement of electrical resistance of dermal-visceral zones as a diagnostic tool for gynecologic disorders.
Itsekson A; Shepshelovich D; Kanevsky A; Seidman DS
Isr Med Assoc J; 2010 Jun; 12(6):334-7. PubMed ID: 20928985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Skin cancer identification using multifrequency electrical impedance--a potential screening tool.
Aberg P; Nicander I; Hansson J; Geladi P; Holmgren U; Ollmar S
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Dec; 51(12):2097-102. PubMed ID: 15605856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of basal cell carcinoma using electrical impedance and neural networks.
Dua R; Beetner DG; Stoecker WV; Wunsch DC
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Jan; 51(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 14723495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Needle aspiration cytology of the breast: current perspective on the role in diagnosis and management].
Kocjan G
Acta Med Croatica; 2008 Oct; 62(4):391-401. PubMed ID: 19205416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electrical impedance scanning as a new breast cancer risk stratification tool for young women.
Stojadinovic A; Nissan A; Shriver CD; Mittendorf EA; Akin MD; Dickerson V; Lenington S; Platt LD; Stavros T; Goldstein SR; Moskovitz O; Gallimidi Z; Fields SI; Yeshaya A; Allweis TM; Manassa R; Pappo I; Ginor RX; D'Agostino RB; Gur D
J Surg Oncol; 2008 Feb; 97(2):112-20. PubMed ID: 18050282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electrical impedance for estimation of irritation in oral mucosa and skin.
Ollmar S; Eek A; Sundström F; Emtestam L
Med Prog Technol; 1995; 21(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 7791690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Electrical impedance model for evaluation of skin irritation in rabbits and humans.
Ferreira DM; Silva CS; Souza MN
Skin Res Technol; 2007 Aug; 13(3):259-67. PubMed ID: 17610647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis of skin rubor with two-electrode technique.
Uchiyama T; Ishigame S; Niitsuma J; Aikawa Y; Ohta Y
J Tissue Viability; 2008 Nov; 17(4):110-4. PubMed ID: 18374573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Advanced integrated technique in breast cancer thermography.
Ng EY; Kee EC
J Med Eng Technol; 2008; 32(2):103-14. PubMed ID: 17852648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. S3 detection as a diagnostic and prognostic aid in emergency department patients with acute dyspnea.
Collins SP; Peacock WF; Lindsell CJ; Clopton P; Diercks DB; Hiestand B; Hogan C; Kontos MC; Mueller C; Nowak R; Chen WJ; Huang CH; Abraham WT; Amsterdam E; Breidthardt T; Daniels L; Hasan A; Hudson M; McCord J; Naz T; Wagoner LE; Maisel A
Ann Emerg Med; 2009 Jun; 53(6):748-57. PubMed ID: 19232777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prospective trial evaluating electrical impedance scanning of thyroid nodules before thyroidectomy: final results.
Nissan A; Peoples GE; Abu-Wasel B; Adair CF; Prus D; Howard RS; Lenington SG; Fields SI; Freund HR; Peretz T; Burch HB; Shriver CD; Stojadinovic A
Ann Surg; 2008 May; 247(5):843-53. PubMed ID: 18438123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Endoscopic mucosal resection: not only therapeutic, but a diagnostic procedure for sessile gastric polyps.
Szalóki T; Tóth V; Németh I; Tiszlavicz L; Lonovics J; Czakó L
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Apr; 23(4):551-5. PubMed ID: 18070010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The electromagnetic detection of prostatic cancer: evaluation of diagnostic accuracy.
Tubaro A; De Nunzio C; Trucchi A; Stoppacciaro A; Miano L
Urology; 2008 Aug; 72(2):340-4. PubMed ID: 18336888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Zymography--method for quantitation of activity on gelatinase A (pro-MMP-2, 72 kDa) and gelatinase B (pro-MMP-9, 92 kDa) in serum of patients with breast cancer].
Sliwowska I; Kopczyński Z
Wiad Lek; 2007; 60(5-6):241-7. PubMed ID: 17966888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Combined pH-metry/impedance monitoring increases the diagnostic yield in patients with atypical gastroesophageal reflux symptoms.
Bajbouj M; Becker V; Neuber M; Schmid RM; Meining A
Digestion; 2007; 76(3-4):223-8. PubMed ID: 18174685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of triple test score in the diagnosis of palpable breast lump.
Ghimire B; Khan MI; Bibhusal T; Singh Y; Sayami P
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2008; 47(172):189-92. PubMed ID: 19079392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
