452 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17785313)
1. Evaluation of the BioPlex 2200 ANA screen for the detection of antinuclear antibodies and comparison with conventional methods.
Desplat-Jego S; Bardin N; Larida B; Sanmarco M
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2007 Aug; 1109():245-55. PubMed ID: 17785313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the BioPlex 2200 ANA screen: analysis of 510 healthy subjects: incidence of natural/predictive autoantibodies.
Shovman O; Gilburd B; Barzilai O; Shinar E; Larida B; Zandman-Goddard G; Binder SR; Shoenfeld Y
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2005 Jun; 1050():380-8. PubMed ID: 16014555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multiplexed AtheNA multi-lyte immunoassay for ANA screening in autoimmune diseases.
Shovman O; Gilburd B; Zandman-Goddard G; Yehiely A; Langevitz P; Shoenfeld Y
Autoimmunity; 2005 Feb; 38(1):105-9. PubMed ID: 15804711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laboratory screening of connective tissue diseases by a new automated ENA screening assay (EliA Symphony) in clinically defined patients.
González C; García-Berrocal B; Pérez M; Navajo JA; Herraez O; González-Buitrago JM
Clin Chim Acta; 2005 Sep; 359(1-2):109-14. PubMed ID: 15894301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measurement of autoantibodies using multiplex methodology in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.
Hanly JG; Thompson K; McCurdy G; Fougere L; Theriault C; Wilton K
J Immunol Methods; 2010 Jan; 352(1-2):147-52. PubMed ID: 19836394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effective detection of non-antidouble-stranded DNA antinuclear antibody specificities in daily clinical practice.
Vos PA; Bast EJ; Derksen RH
Rheumatology (Oxford); 2006 May; 45(5):629-35. PubMed ID: 16368728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. BioPlex 2200 multiplexed system: simultaneous detection of anti-dsDNA and anti-chromatin antibodies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.
Bardin N; Desplat-Jego S; Daniel L; Jourde Chiche N; Sanmarco M
Autoimmunity; 2009 Jan; 42(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 19127456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of different test systems for simultaneous autoantibody detection in connective tissue diseases.
Eissfeller P; Sticherling M; Scholz D; Hennig K; Lüttich T; Motz M; Kromminga A
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2005 Jun; 1050():327-39. PubMed ID: 16014549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the LIAISON ANA screen assay for antinuclear antibody testing in autoimmune diseases.
Ghillani P; Rouquette AM; Desgruelles C; Hauguel N; Le Pendeven C; Piette JC; Musset L
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2007 Aug; 1109():407-13. PubMed ID: 17785329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Evaluation of simultaneous detection of specific antinuclear antibodies using multiplexed technology].
Uto K; Hayashi N; Kinoshita S; Kawano S; Kumagai S
Rinsho Byori; 2009 Oct; 57(10):941-53. PubMed ID: 19928490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlation of antinuclear antibody immunofluorescence patterns with immune profile using line immunoassay in the Indian scenario.
Sebastian W; Roy A; Kini U; Mullick S
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2010; 53(3):427-32. PubMed ID: 20699497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficiency of different strategies to detect autoantibodies to extractable nuclear antigens.
Almeida González D; Cabrera de León A; Rodríguez Pérez Mdel C; Brito Díaz B; González Hernández A; García García D; Vázquez Moncholi C; Aguirre Jaime A
J Immunol Methods; 2010 Aug; 360(1-2):89-95. PubMed ID: 20600078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection of autoantibodies to nuclear antigens by EIA and IF techniques.
Alem M; Moghadam S; Malki J; Zaidi A; Nayak N; Li TM
Allerg Immunol (Paris); 1997 Sep; 29(7):188, 191-4. PubMed ID: 9373708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparison between line immunoassay (LIA) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the determination of antibodies to extractable nuclear antigenes (ENA) with reference to other laboratory results and clinical features].
Maclachlan D; Vogt P; Wu X; Rose L; Tyndall A; Hasler P
Z Rheumatol; 2002 Oct; 61(5):534-44. PubMed ID: 12399881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection and identification of significant ANAs in previously determined ANA negative samples.
Kidd K; Cusi K; Mueller R; Goodner M; Boyes B; Hoy E
Clin Lab; 2005; 51(9-10):517-21. PubMed ID: 16285474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the new multiplexed immunoassay, FIDIS, for simultaneous quantitative determination of antinuclear antibodies and comparison with conventional methods.
Rouquette AM; Desgruelles C; Laroche P
Am J Clin Pathol; 2003 Nov; 120(5):676-81. PubMed ID: 14608892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Antinuclear antibody detection by automated multiplex immunoassay in untreated patients at the time of diagnosis.
Op De Beéck K; Vermeersch P; Verschueren P; Westhovens R; Mariën G; Blockmans D; Bossuyt X
Autoimmun Rev; 2012 Dec; 12(2):137-43. PubMed ID: 22387973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of antinuclear antibodies: comparative evaluation of enzyme immunoassay and indirect immunofluorescence methods.
Homburger HA; Cahen YD; Griffiths J; Jacob GL
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Nov; 122(11):993-9. PubMed ID: 9822128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multiplex assessment of non-organ-specific autoantibodies with a novel microbead-based immunoassay.
Grossmann K; Roggenbuck D; Schröder C; Conrad K; Schierack P; Sack U
Cytometry A; 2011 Feb; 79(2):118-25. PubMed ID: 21265005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical value of multiplexed bead-based immunoassays for detection of autoantibodies to nuclear antigens.
Avaniss-Aghajani E; Berzon S; Sarkissian A
Clin Vaccine Immunol; 2007 May; 14(5):505-9. PubMed ID: 17376860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
