104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17785561)
1. Classification based on the combination of molecular and pathologic predictors is superior to molecular classification on prognosis in colorectal carcinoma.
Xu F; Wang F; Di M; Huang Q; Wang M; Hu H; Jin Y; Dong J; Lai M
Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Sep; 13(17):5082-8. PubMed ID: 17785561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prognostic significance of DNA ploidy and proliferation in 309 colorectal carcinomas as determined by two-color multiparametric DNA flow cytometry.
Zarbo RJ; Nakhleh RE; Brown RD; Kubus JJ; Ma CK; Mackowiak P
Cancer; 1997 Jun; 79(11):2073-86. PubMed ID: 9179053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hierarchical clustering analysis of tissue microarray immunostaining data identifies prognostically significant groups of breast carcinoma.
Makretsov NA; Huntsman DG; Nielsen TO; Yorida E; Peacock M; Cheang MC; Dunn SE; Hayes M; van de Rijn M; Bajdik C; Gilks CB
Clin Cancer Res; 2004 Sep; 10(18 Pt 1):6143-51. PubMed ID: 15448001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Study on the prognostic factors of colorectal cancer and on suggested model for prediction].
Liu W; Nie SF; Chen JG; Huang T; He JJ; Liu C
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Jul; 28(7):700-3. PubMed ID: 18069564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Profiling markers of prognosis in colorectal cancer.
Lyall MS; Dundas SR; Curran S; Murray GI
Clin Cancer Res; 2006 Feb; 12(4):1184-91. PubMed ID: 16489072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Metastatic lymph node ratio is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer.
Asoglu O; Karanlik H; Parlak M; Kecer M; Muslumanoglu M; Igci A; Ozmen V; Gulluoglu M; Kapran Y
Hepatogastroenterology; 2009; 56(91-92):908-13. PubMed ID: 19621727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of clinical outcome in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma using TNM classification score and molecular biological classification.
Takeno S; Noguchi T; Takahashi Y; Fumoto S; Shibata T; Kawahara K
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):1431-8. PubMed ID: 17260107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction of prognosis is not improved by the seventh and latest edition of the TNM classification for colorectal cancer in a single-center collective.
Nitsche U; Maak M; Schuster T; Künzli B; Langer R; Slotta-Huspenina J; Janssen KP; Friess H; Rosenberg R
Ann Surg; 2011 Nov; 254(5):793-800; discussion 800-1. PubMed ID: 22042471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognostic variables and prognostic groups for malignant melanoma. The information from Cox and Classification And Regression Trees analysis: an Italian population-based study.
Crocetti E; Mangone L; Lo Scocco G; Carli P
Melanoma Res; 2006 Oct; 16(5):429-33. PubMed ID: 17013092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic factors in survival of colorectal cancer patients after surgery.
Mehrkhani F; Nasiri S; Donboli K; Meysamie A; Hedayat A
Colorectal Dis; 2009 Feb; 11(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 18462239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Non-small cell lung cancer with ipsilateral pulmonary metastases: prognosis analysis and staging assessment.
Lee JG; Lee CY; Kim DJ; Chung KY; Park IK
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2008 Mar; 33(3):480-4. PubMed ID: 18249000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Overexpression of FLIPL is an independent marker of poor prognosis in colorectal cancer patients.
Ullenhag GJ; Mukherjee A; Watson NF; Al-Attar AH; Scholefield JH; Durrant LG
Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Sep; 13(17):5070-5. PubMed ID: 17785559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Constructing molecular classifiers for the accurate prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma.
Guo L; Ma Y; Ward R; Castranova V; Shi X; Qian Y
Clin Cancer Res; 2006 Jun; 12(11 Pt 1):3344-54. PubMed ID: 16740756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Proposal of an improved prognostic classification for pT3 renal cell carcinoma.
Terrone C; Gontero P; Volpe A; Porpiglia F; Bollito E; Zattoni F; Frea B; Tizzani A; Fontana D; Scarpa RM; Rossetti SR
J Urol; 2008 Jul; 180(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 18485380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Micropapillary component in colorectal carcinoma is associated with lymph node metastasis in T1 and T2 Stages and decreased survival time in TNM stages I and II.
Xu F; Xu J; Lou Z; Di M; Wang F; Hu H; Lai M
Am J Surg Pathol; 2009 Sep; 33(9):1287-92. PubMed ID: 19471152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tumour budding at invasive margins and outcome in colorectal cancer.
Kanazawa H; Mitomi H; Nishiyama Y; Kishimoto I; Fukui N; Nakamura T; Watanabe M
Colorectal Dis; 2008 Jan; 10(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 18078460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Study on independent factors on the prognosis of colorectal carcinoma: TNM stage, tumor budding, perineural invasion, peritumoral-lymphocytic infiltration and urine glucose].
Xu FY; Dong JK; Zhu YM; Qu MJ; Wang FJ; Jin YS; Ren GP; Lai MD
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2005 May; 26(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 16053766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multimarker phenotype predicts adverse survival in patients with lymph node-negative colorectal cancer.
Zlobec I; Minoo P; Baumhoer D; Baker K; Terracciano L; Jass JR; Lugli A
Cancer; 2008 Feb; 112(3):495-502. PubMed ID: 18076013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prognostic significance of the number of metastatic lymph nodes: is UICC/TNM node classification perfectly suitable for early gastric cancer?
Huang B; Zheng X; Wang Z; Wang M; Dong Y; Zhao B; Xu H
Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Jan; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 18998065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prognostic significance of multiple molecular markers for patients with stage II colorectal cancer undergoing curative resection.
Uen YH; Lin SR; Wu DC; Su YC; Wu JY; Cheng TL; Chi CW; Wang JY
Ann Surg; 2007 Dec; 246(6):1040-6. PubMed ID: 18043108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
