These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17786758)

  • 1. Introduction of the multiple mini interview into the admissions process at the University of Calgary: acceptability and feasibility.
    Brownell K; Lockyer J; Collin T; Lemay JF
    Med Teach; 2007 May; 29(4):394-6. PubMed ID: 17786758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of applicants to the veterinary curriculum using a multiple mini-interview method.
    Hecker K; Donnon T; Fuentealba C; Hall D; Illanes O; Morck DW; Muelling C
    J Vet Med Educ; 2009; 36(2):166-73. PubMed ID: 19625664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of non-cognitive traits through the admissions multiple mini-interview.
    Lemay JF; Lockyer JM; Collin VT; Brownell AK
    Med Educ; 2007 Jun; 41(6):573-9. PubMed ID: 17518837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multiple mini-interviews versus traditional interviews: stakeholder acceptability comparison.
    Razack S; Faremo S; Drolet F; Snell L; Wiseman J; Pickering J
    Med Educ; 2009 Oct; 43(10):993-1000. PubMed ID: 19769649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A cost efficiency comparison between the multiple mini-interview and traditional admissions interviews.
    Rosenfeld JM; Reiter HI; Trinh K; Eva KW
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Mar; 13(1):43-58. PubMed ID: 17009095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A generalizability analysis of a veterinary school Multiple Mini Interview: effect of number of interviewers, type of interviewers, and number of stations.
    Hecker K; Violato C
    Teach Learn Med; 2011 Oct; 23(4):331-6. PubMed ID: 22004317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The acceptability of the multiple mini interview for resident selection.
    Hofmeister M; Lockyer J; Crutcher R
    Fam Med; 2008; 40(10):734-40. PubMed ID: 18979262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What does the multiple mini interview have to offer over the panel interview?
    Pau A; Chen YS; Lee VK; Sow CF; De Alwis R
    Med Educ Online; 2016; 21():29874. PubMed ID: 26873337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Discerning quality: using the multiple mini-interview in student selection for the Australian National University Medical School.
    Harris S; Owen C
    Med Educ; 2007 Mar; 41(3):234-41. PubMed ID: 17316207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of aboriginal and nonaboriginal applicants for admissions on the Multiple Mini-Interview using aboriginal and nonaboriginal interviewers.
    Moreau K; Reiter H; Eva KW
    Teach Learn Med; 2006; 18(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 16354142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors affecting the utility of the multiple mini-interview in selecting candidates for graduate-entry medical school.
    Roberts C; Walton M; Rothnie I; Crossley J; Lyon P; Kumar K; Tiller D
    Med Educ; 2008 Apr; 42(4):396-404. PubMed ID: 18338992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of the interview in admissions.
    Seymour RJ; McDougall RV; Wadsworth CT; Sanders BR
    J Allied Health; 1982 May; 11(2):88-95. PubMed ID: 7187903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Psychometric properties of the multiple mini-interview used for medical admissions: findings from generalizability and Rasch analyses.
    Sebok SS; Luu K; Klinger DA
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2014 Mar; 19(1):71-84. PubMed ID: 23709188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Should efforts in favor of medical student diversity be focused during admissions or farther upstream?
    Reiter HI; Lockyer J; Ziola B; Courneya CA; Eva K;
    Acad Med; 2012 Apr; 87(4):443-8. PubMed ID: 22361795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Matriculating student perceptions of changes to the admissions interview process at the University of Wisconsin Medical School: a prospective, controlled comparison.
    Albanese MA; Snow M; Skochelak S; Huggett K; Farrell PM
    WMJ; 2003; 102(2):30-3. PubMed ID: 12754905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contribution of medical students to admission interviews.
    Koc T; Katona C; Rees PJ
    Med Educ; 2008 Mar; 42(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 18221267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Non-association between Neo-5 personality tests and multiple mini-interview.
    Kulasegaram K; Reiter HI; Wiesner W; Hackett RD; Norman GR
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2010 Aug; 15(3):415-23. PubMed ID: 20013153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Enhancing the reliability of the multiple mini-interview for selecting prospective health care leaders.
    Uijtdehaage S; Doyle L; Parker N
    Acad Med; 2011 Aug; 86(8):1032-9. PubMed ID: 21694560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transition to multiple mini interview (MMI) interviewing for medical school admissions.
    Langer T; Ruiz C; Tsai P; Adams U; Powierza C; Vijay A; Alvarez P; Beck Dallahan G; Rahangdale L
    Perspect Med Educ; 2020 Aug; 9(4):229-235. PubMed ID: 32833134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Utility of a writing station in the multiple mini-interview.
    Raghavan M; Burnett M; Martin BD; Christensen H; Young DG; Mackalski B; Aoki F
    J Vet Med Educ; 2013; 40(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 23697543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.