These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17787067)

  • 1. Some comments on false discovery rate.
    Bar-Hen A; Kim KI; Van De Wiel MA
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2007 Aug; 5(4):987-90. PubMed ID: 17787067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comments on probabilistic models behind the concept of false discovery rate.
    Qiu X; Yakovlev A
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2007 Aug; 5(4):963-75. PubMed ID: 17787065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Over- and Underestimation of Success Rates].
    Höder J; Eisemann N; Hüppe A
    Gesundheitswesen; 2015 Jun; 77(6):426-31. PubMed ID: 25001904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comments on 'On correcting the overestimation of the permutation-based false discovery rate estimator'.
    Xie Y
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Oct; 24(20):2420. PubMed ID: 18762484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How often should we expect to be wrong? Statistical power, P values, and the expected prevalence of false discoveries.
    Marino MJ
    Biochem Pharmacol; 2018 May; 151():226-233. PubMed ID: 29248599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Some comments on instability of false discovery rate estimation.
    Qiu X; Yakovlev A
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2006 Oct; 4(5):1057-68. PubMed ID: 17099941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparisons of false negative rates from a trend test alone and from a trend test jointly with a control-high groups pairwise test in the determination of the carcinogenicity of new drugs.
    Lin KK; Rahman MA
    J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(1):128-142. PubMed ID: 29781779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multidimensional local false discovery rate for microarray studies.
    Ploner A; Calza S; Gusnanto A; Pawitan Y
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 22(5):556-65. PubMed ID: 16368770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A statistics primer. Hypothesis testing.
    Kuhn JE; Greenfield ML; Wojtys EM
    Am J Sports Med; 1996; 24(5):702-3. PubMed ID: 8883697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Not different is not the same as the same: how can we tell?
    Drummond GB; Vowler SL
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 2012 Dec; 39(12):991-4. PubMed ID: 23919813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Not different is not the same as the same: how can we tell?
    Drummond GB; Vowler SL
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2012 Dec; 36(4):261-4. PubMed ID: 23209006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Not different is not the same as the same: how can we tell?
    Drummond GB; Vowler SL
    Microcirculation; 2012 Nov; 19(8):771-4. PubMed ID: 23164036
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sample size determination for the false discovery rate.
    Pounds S; Cheng C
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 21(23):4263-71. PubMed ID: 16204346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A note on using permutation-based false discovery rate estimates to compare different analysis methods for microarray data.
    Xie Y; Pan W; Khodursky AB
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 21(23):4280-8. PubMed ID: 16188930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Restricted Boltzmann machines based oversampling and semi-supervised learning for false positive reduction in breast CAD.
    Cao P; Liu X; Bao H; Yang J; Zhao D
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26 Suppl 1():S1541-7. PubMed ID: 26405918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Not different is not the same as the same: how can we tell?
    Drummond GB; Vowler SL
    Exp Physiol; 2013 Feb; 98(2):351-4. PubMed ID: 23349528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Controlling False Discovery Rate in Signal Space for Transformation-Invariant Thresholding of Statistical Maps.
    Li J; Shi Y; Toga AW
    Inf Process Med Imaging; 2015; 24():125-36. PubMed ID: 26213450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new system of visual presentation of analysis of test performance: the "double-ring" diagram.
    Stefadouros MA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1993 Oct; 46(10):1151-8. PubMed ID: 7691997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The 'miss rate' for the analysis of gene expression data.
    Taylor J; Tibshirani R; Efron B
    Biostatistics; 2005 Jan; 6(1):111-7. PubMed ID: 15618531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nonparametric bayesian estimation of positive false discovery rates.
    Tang Y; Ghosal S; Roy A
    Biometrics; 2007 Dec; 63(4):1126-34. PubMed ID: 17501943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.