These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1778708)
21. Comparing the cost of reusable and disposable packs. MacLean C Mater Manag Health Care; 1994 Feb; 3(2):24-6, 28. PubMed ID: 10131599 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. [25-year experience with reusable heart catheters]. Buchwalsky R; Grove R; Feldkamp E Z Kardiol; 2001 Aug; 90(8):542-9. PubMed ID: 11565209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cutting costs or cutting corners? Cardiac cath reuse. Wilson D Mater Manag Health Care; 1997 May; 6(5):34, 36. PubMed ID: 10167493 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Report from the Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment (CCOHTA). Guidelines for economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals: Canada. Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1995; 11(4):796-7. PubMed ID: 8567213 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Reports from the Conseil d'évaluation des Technologies de la Santé du Québec. Hemodialyzer reuse: considerations of safety and cost. Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1991; 7(4):639-40. PubMed ID: 1778710 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Report from the Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment (CCOHTA). Photodynamic therapy. Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1994; 10(4):711-3. PubMed ID: 7843892 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Reports from the Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment (CCOHTA). HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors: a review of published clinical trials and pharmacoeconomic evaluations. Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1998; 14(2):396-8. PubMed ID: 9678976 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy lends itself well to another look at reusable vs. disposable instrument packs. Hickey M; Fields M Hosp Mater Manage; 1996 May; 21(5):14-5. PubMed ID: 10157583 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Reusable versus disposable biopsy forceps: an economic comparison]. Jörgensen E; Busch C; Ujlaky R Z Gastroenterol; 2008 Oct; 46(10):1185-7. PubMed ID: 18937187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Funding the new biologics--what can we learn from infliximab? The CCOHTA report: a gastroenterologist's viewpoint. Hilsden R Can J Gastroenterol; 2002 Dec; 16(12):865-8. PubMed ID: 12522477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A life cycle assessment of reusable and single-use central venous catheter insertion kits. McGain F; McAlister S; McGavin A; Story D Anesth Analg; 2012 May; 114(5):1073-80. PubMed ID: 22492185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Infection risk of cardiac catheterization and arterial angiography with single and multiple use disposable catheters. Frank U; Herz L; Daschner FD Clin Cardiol; 1988 Nov; 11(11):785-7. PubMed ID: 3233806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Reusing "single use" items: new perspectives. Martin DL Dimens Health Serv; 1984 May; 61(5):28. PubMed ID: 6734977 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Reuse of flow-directed balloon-tipped catheters. Butler L; Worthly LI Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1982 Mar; 284(6317):707. PubMed ID: 6802297 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Trends and patterns in electrophysiologic and ablation catheter reuse in the United States. Mickelsen S; Mickelsen C; MacIndoe C; Jaramillo J; Bass S; West G; Kusumoto FM Am J Cardiol; 2001 Feb; 87(3):351-3, A9. PubMed ID: 11165978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Questions about re-sterilization and reuse of sterile disposable devices]. Petrás G; Bolváry G Orv Hetil; 1995 Oct; 136(43):2339-42. PubMed ID: 7478479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Reuse of disposables in the catheterization laboratory. Report of the committee appointed by the Cardiological Society of India. Indian Heart J; 1997; 49(3):329-31. PubMed ID: 9291665 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]