These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1779211)
1. Conceptions of morality and the doctrine of double effect. Nelson WN J Med Philos; 1991 Oct; 16(5):545-64. PubMed ID: 1779211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Four versions of double effect. Marquis DB J Med Philos; 1991 Oct; 16(5):515-44; discussion 565-70. PubMed ID: 1779210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The doctrine of double effect: reflections on theoretical and practical issues. Kamm FM J Med Philos; 1991 Oct; 16(5):571-85. PubMed ID: 1779212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Moral absolutism and the double-effect exception: reflections on Joseph Boyle's Who is entitled to double effect? Donagan A J Med Philos; 1991 Oct; 16(5):495-509; discussion 565-70. PubMed ID: 1779209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Who is entitled to double effect? Boyle J J Med Philos; 1991 Oct; 16(5):475-94; discussion 511-4. PubMed ID: 1779208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The theoretical tenability of the doctrine of double effect. Bole TJ J Med Philos; 1991 Oct; 16(5):467-73. PubMed ID: 1779207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reply to Boyle's "Who is entitled to double effect? Quinn W J Med Philos; 1991 Oct; 16(5):511-4. PubMed ID: 11642951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does ethical theory have a future in bioethics? Beauchamp TL J Law Med Ethics; 2004; 32(2):209-17, 190. PubMed ID: 15301185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Further thoughts on double effect: some preliminary responses. Boyle J J Med Philos; 1991 Oct; 16(5):565-70. PubMed ID: 11642952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Philosophy lessons from the clinical setting: seven sayings that used to annoy me. Morreim EH Theor Med; 1986 Feb; 7(1):47-63. PubMed ID: 3704958 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Two challenges to the double effect doctrine: euthanasia and abortion. Shaw AB J Med Ethics; 2002 Apr; 28(2):102-4. PubMed ID: 11934939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Don't confuse me with ethics: I already know what's right. Taylor A J Nucl Med; 1992 Feb; 33(2):296-303. PubMed ID: 1732458 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Can ethnography save the life of medical ethics? Hoffmaster B Soc Sci Med; 1992 Dec; 35(12):1421-31. PubMed ID: 1485190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radical moral disagreement in contemporary health care: a Roman Catholic perspective. Boyle J J Med Philos; 1994 Apr; 19(2):183-200. PubMed ID: 8051516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The moral meaning of religion for bioethics. Campbell CS Bull Pan Am Health Organ; 1990; 24(4):386-93. PubMed ID: 2073553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contemporary philosophical literature on suicide: a review. Mayo DJ Suicide Life Threat Behav; 1983; 13(4):313-45. PubMed ID: 6676953 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Cultural diversity and the case against ethical relativism. Brannigan M Health Care Anal; 2000; 8(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 11186029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Studies in the explanation of issues in biomedical ethics: the example of abortion. Erde EL J Med Philos; 1988 Nov; 13(4):329-47. PubMed ID: 3246574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bioethical decision-making: which path to choose? Overduin DC Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1985; 442():583-4. PubMed ID: 3860061 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]