493 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17802982)
1. Not being clear about authorship is lying and damages the scientific record.
England C; Hodgkinson M; Tamber PS
Natl Med J India; 2007; 20(2):56-8. PubMed ID: 17802982
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes.
Fox MF
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 11653366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Publication ethics policies for medical journals.
Pai SA
Indian J Med Ethics; 2004; 1(3):93. PubMed ID: 16370089
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Inappropriate authorship in collaborative science research.
Pennock RT
Public Aff Q; 1996 Oct; 10(4):379-93. PubMed ID: 11654653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The 'truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth...'.
Broome ME
Nurs Outlook; 2008; 56(6):281-2. PubMed ID: 19041445
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Commentary: monitoring biological data.
Kritchevsky D
Account Res; 1990 Oct; 1(2):85-6. PubMed ID: 15991407
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Recognition, reward and responsibility: why the authorship of scientific papers matters.
Wager E
Maturitas; 2009 Feb; 62(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 19147308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ethics in publishing: what are some of the concerns?
Lund D
J Food Sci; 2012 Mar; 77(3):v. PubMed ID: 22384970
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Promoting scientific standards.
Alberts B
Science; 2010 Jan; 327(5961):12. PubMed ID: 20044544
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The dark side of scientific research.
McDonald JC
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 118(3):231-2. PubMed ID: 16772306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Editors' responsibility in defeating fraud.
Meguid MM
Nature; 1999 May; 399(6731):13. PubMed ID: 10331380
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Scientific misconduct. Bell Labs fires star physicist found guilty of forging data.
Service RF
Science; 2002 Oct; 298(5591):30-1. PubMed ID: 12364753
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Author and authorship in medical journals].
Matías-Guiu J; García-Ramos R
Neurologia; 2009; 24(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 19214815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ghost writers in the sky.
J Urol; 2008 Mar; 179(3):809-10. PubMed ID: 18221969
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Scientific misconduct. Cleaning up the paper trail.
Couzin J; Unger K
Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5770):38-43. PubMed ID: 16601164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Scientific misconduct. Hall probe continues; no 'willful' fraud.
Dayton L
Science; 2002 Apr; 296(5568):641. PubMed ID: 11976422
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Authorship policy.
Novack GD
Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Jan; 147(1):184; author reply 184-5. PubMed ID: 19100357
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Next steps in the Schön affair.
Kennedy D
Science; 2002 Oct; 298(5593):495. PubMed ID: 12386303
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Writing and publishing health sciences research: ethical considerations and experiences from EAMJ.
Lore W
East Afr Med J; 1999 Dec; 76(12):659-60. PubMed ID: 10734532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Studying journal editors: the worst heresy.
Epstein WM
IRB; 1989; 11(5):7-8. PubMed ID: 11650253
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
