These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17803338)
1. A lifetime modelled economic evaluation comparing pioglitazone and rosiglitazone for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the UK. Home P; Bagust A; Taylor M; Ambery P; Mendes da Costa S Pharmacoeconomics; 2007; 25(9):801-2; author reply 802-5. PubMed ID: 17803338 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A lifetime modelled economic evaluation comparing pioglitazone and rosiglitazone for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the UK. Tilden DP; Mariz S; O'Bryan-Tear G; Bottomley J; Diamantopoulos A Pharmacoeconomics; 2007; 25(1):39-54. PubMed ID: 17192117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparisons of rosiglitazone versus pioglitazone monotherapy introduction and associated health care utilization in medicaid-enrolled patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Balkrishnan R; Arondekar BV; Camacho FT; Shenolikar RA; Horblyuk R; Anderson RT Clin Ther; 2007; 29 Spec No():1306-15. PubMed ID: 18046930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pioglitazone versus rosiglitazone treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia: cost-effectiveness in the US. Tunis SL; Minshall ME; St Charles M; Pandya BJ; Baran RW Curr Med Res Opin; 2008 Nov; 24(11):3085-96. PubMed ID: 18826750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How Did Multiple FDA Actions Affect the Utilization and Reimbursed Costs of Thiazolidinediones in US Medicaid? Hsu JC; Ross-Degnan D; Wagner AK; Zhang F; Lu CY Clin Ther; 2015 Jul; 37(7):1420-1432.e1. PubMed ID: 25976425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modelling lifetime metabolic progression and cost effectiveness of treatment strategies for type 2 diabetes. Palmer AJ; Currie CJ Pharmacoeconomics; 2006; 24(9):927-9; author reply 929-35. PubMed ID: 16942126 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparisons of rosiglitazone versus pioglitazone monotherapy introduction and associated health care utilization in Medicaid-enrolled patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Balkrishnan R; Arondekar BV; Camacho FT; Shenolikar RA; Horblyuk R; Anderson RT Clin Ther; 2007 Jun; 29(6 Pt 1):1306-15. PubMed ID: 18036392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. PROactive 06: cost-effectiveness of pioglitazone in Type 2 diabetes in the UK. Valentine WJ; Bottomley JM; Palmer AJ; Brändle M; Foos V; Williams R; Dormandy JA; Yates J; Tan MH; Massi-Benedetti M; Diabet Med; 2007 Sep; 24(9):982-1002. PubMed ID: 17593245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost effectiveness of combination therapy with pioglitazone for type 2 diabetes mellitus from a german statutory healthcare perspective. Neeser K; Lübben G; Siebert U; Schramm W Pharmacoeconomics; 2004; 22(5):321-41. PubMed ID: 15061682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness analysis of thiazolidinediones in uncontrolled type 2 diabetic patients receiving sulfonylureas and metformin in Thailand. Chirakup S; Chaiyakunapruk N; Chaikledkeaw U; Pongcharoensuk P; Ongphiphadhanakul B; Roze S; Valentine WJ; Palmer AJ Value Health; 2008 Mar; 11 Suppl 1():S43-51. PubMed ID: 18387067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lifetime health consequences and cost-effectiveness of rosiglitazone in combination with metformin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in Spain. Shearer AT; Bagust A; Ampudia-Blasco FJ; Martínez-Lage Alvarez B; Pérez Escolano I; París G Pharmacoeconomics; 2006; 24 Suppl 1():49-59. PubMed ID: 16800162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term cost-effectiveness of pioglitazone versus placebo in addition to existing diabetes treatment: a US analysis based on PROactive. Valentine WJ; Tucker D; Palmer AJ; Minshall ME; Foos V; Silberman C; Value Health; 2009; 12(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 18657104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A retrospective cohort study of economic outcomes and adherence to monotherapy with metformin, pioglitazone, or a sulfonylurea among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the United States from 2003 to 2005. Hansen RA; Farley JF; Droege M; Maciejewski ML Clin Ther; 2010 Jul; 32(7):1308-19. PubMed ID: 20678679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A cost-effectiveness analysis of pioglitazone plus metformin compared with rosiglitazone plus metformin from a third-party payer perspective in the US. St Charles M; Minshall ME; Pandya BJ; Baran RW; Tunis SL Curr Med Res Opin; 2009 Jun; 25(6):1343-53. PubMed ID: 19419339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Healthcare costs and prescription adherence with introduction of thiazolidinedione therapy in Medicaid type 2 diabetic patients: a retrospective data analysis. Balkrishnan R; Rajagopalan R; Shenolikar RA; Camacho FT; Whitmire JT; Anderson RT Curr Med Res Opin; 2004 Oct; 20(10):1633-40. PubMed ID: 15462696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Repaglinide : a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Plosker GL; Figgitt DP Pharmacoeconomics; 2004; 22(6):389-411. PubMed ID: 15099124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Status of glitazones in treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus]. Willeke A Internist (Berl); 2007 Jul; 48(7):749; author reply 749-50. PubMed ID: 17571246 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term cost-consequence analysis of exenatide once weekly vs sitagliptin or pioglitazone for the treatment of type 2 diabetes patients in the United States. Guillermin AL; Lloyd A; Best JH; DeYoung MB; Samyshkin Y; Gaebler JA J Med Econ; 2012; 15(4):654-63. PubMed ID: 22369345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of lipid and glycemic effects of pioglitazone and rosiglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia: response to Goldberg et al. Brunzell JD Diabetes Care; 2005 Dec; 28(12):2984-5; author reply 2985-6. PubMed ID: 16331869 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]