These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17803716)

  • 1. An examination of the role of opportunistic smear taking in the NHS cervical screening programme using data from the CSEU cervical screening cohort study.
    Blanks RG; Moss SM; Coleman DA; Swerdlow AJ
    BJOG; 2007 Nov; 114(11):1408-13. PubMed ID: 17803716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of screening episodes linked to CIN3 and invasive cancer registrations to study outcomes from the NHS Cervical Screening Programme.
    Blanks RG; Moss SM; Coleman DA; Addou S; Swerdlow AJ
    Cytopathology; 2009 Jun; 20(3):154-60. PubMed ID: 19207309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Health authority cervical screening recall policies and time since last smear: a retrospective cohort analysis in the north west England.
    Howe A; Owen-Smith V; Richardson J
    J Med Screen; 2003; 10(4):184-8. PubMed ID: 14746327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Informed consent? How do primary care professionals prepare women for cervical smears: a qualitative study.
    Chew-Graham C; Mole E; Evans LJ; Rogers A
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Jun; 61(3):381-8. PubMed ID: 15964735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The agreement between self-reported cervical smear abnormalities and screening programme records.
    Canfell K; Beral V; Green J; Cameron R; Baker K; Brown A
    J Med Screen; 2006; 13(2):72-5. PubMed ID: 16792828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Audit of cervical screening in women with HIV infection in the Auckland and Northland regions of New Zealand.
    Grewal J; Lowe M; Gerrard H; Henley R; Perkins N; Briggs S
    N Z Med J; 2010 Jul; 123(1319):71-8. PubMed ID: 20717179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A quasi-randomized trial on the effectiveness of an invitation letter to improve participation in a setting of opportunistic screening for cervical cancer.
    de Jonge E; Cloes E; Op de Beeck L; Adriaens B; Lousbergh D; Orye GG; Buntinx F
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2008 Jun; 17(3):238-42. PubMed ID: 18414195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cervical cytology smears in sexually transmitted infection clinics in the United Kingdom.
    Wilson JD; Parsons W;
    Sex Transm Infect; 2001 Apr; 77(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 11287688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cancer prevention in primary care. Screening for cervical cancer.
    Austoker J
    BMJ; 1994 Jul; 309(6949):241-8. PubMed ID: 7980803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving uptake of cervical cancer screening in women with prolonged history of non-attendance for screening: a randomized trial of enhanced invitation methods.
    Stein K; Lewendon G; Jenkins R; Davis C
    J Med Screen; 2005; 12(4):185-9. PubMed ID: 16417695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The 1996 revision of the Dutch cervical cancer screening programme: increased coverage, fewer repeat smears and less opportunistic screening].
    Berkers LM; van Ballegooijen M; van Kemenade FJ; Rebolj M; Essink-Bot ML; Helmerhorst TJ; Habbema JD
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2007 Jun; 151(23):1288-94. PubMed ID: 17624160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pap test--with or without vaginal smear?
    Milicić-Juhas V; Perić M; Pajtler M; Prvulović I; Curzik D
    Coll Antropol; 2010 Mar; 34(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 20437636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Opportunistic cervical screening at a sexual health clinic.
    Treacy A; Lyons F; Mulcahy F
    Ir Med J; 2006; 99(7):198-9. PubMed ID: 16986561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Have the most recent Pap smear guidelines affected GP practices?
    Wai D; Ferrier A; Collings S; Laverty C
    Aust Fam Physician; 1996 Jan; Suppl 1():S44-8. PubMed ID: 9479800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Mass screening for cervical cancer. Experiences after 25 years of voluntary screening and 2 years of organized screening].
    Thoresen SO; Skare GB; Sandvin O
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1997 Aug; 117(18):2613-5. PubMed ID: 9324815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cervical smears--an opportunity for disinvestment?
    Spence MT; Woodman C; Collins S; Donnelly B; Desai M
    Br J Gen Pract; 1996 Sep; 46(410):537-8. PubMed ID: 8917874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adherence to breast and cervical cancer screening in Spanish women with diabetes: associated factors and trend between 2006 and 2010.
    Martinez-Huedo MA; Lopez de Andres A; Hernandez-Barrera V; Carrasco-Garrido P; Martinez Hernandez D; Jiménez-Garcia R
    Diabetes Metab; 2012 Apr; 38(2):142-8. PubMed ID: 22078638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cervical cancer screening in a rural population of Zimbabwe.
    Thistle PJ; Chirenje ZM
    Cent Afr J Med; 1997 Sep; 43(9):246-51. PubMed ID: 9509642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A study of the effect of introducing a restrictive cervical screening policy on laboratory workload and cervical cancer detection rates.
    Channer JL; Mackenzie EF
    Cytopathology; 1990; 1(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 2130995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Increasing women's compliance with opportunistic cervical cancer screening: a randomized trial.
    Ward JE; Boyle K; Redman S; Sanson-Fisher RW
    Am J Prev Med; 1991; 7(5):285-91. PubMed ID: 1790034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.