These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17803986)

  • 21. On the role of articulatory prosodies in German message decoding.
    Kohler KJ; Niebuhr O
    Phonetica; 2011; 68(1-2):57-87. PubMed ID: 21804333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Regional accent variation in the shadowing task: evidence for a loose perception-action coupling in speech.
    Mitterer H; Müsseler J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Apr; 75(3):557-75. PubMed ID: 23345089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dialectical effects on nasalance: a multicenter, cross-continental study.
    Awan SN; Bressmann T; Poburka B; Roy N; Sharp H; Watts C
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Feb; 58(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 25260176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The influence of semantic context on the perception of Spanish-accented American English.
    Behrman A; Akhund A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Oct; 56(5):1567-78. PubMed ID: 23882007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Perception of clear fricatives by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners.
    Maniwa K; Jongman A; Wade T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1114-25. PubMed ID: 18247912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dimension-based statistical learning of vowels.
    Liu R; Holt LL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1783-98. PubMed ID: 26280268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Stabilizing the production of nonnative consonant clusters with acoustic variability.
    Davidson L; Martin S; Wilson C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):856-72. PubMed ID: 25698019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Speech perception.
    Diehl RL; Lotto AJ; Holt LL
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2004; 55():149-79. PubMed ID: 14744213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Intelligibility of dysarthric speech: perceptions of speakers and listeners.
    Walshe M; Miller N; Leahy M; Murray A
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2008; 43(6):633-48. PubMed ID: 18608608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Relational timing in the production and perception of Japanese singleton and geminate stops.
    Idemaru K; Guion-Anderson S
    Phonetica; 2010; 67(1-2):25-46. PubMed ID: 20798568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of dialect on merger perception: ERP and behavioral correlates.
    Conrey B; Potts GF; Niedzielski NA
    Brain Lang; 2005 Dec; 95(3):435-49. PubMed ID: 16099494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of training on the acoustic phonetic representation of synthetic speech.
    Francis AL; Nusbaum HC; Fenn K
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Dec; 50(6):1445-65. PubMed ID: 18055767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Perceptual similarity of regional dialects of American English.
    Clopper CG; Levi SV; Pisoni DB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jan; 119(1):566-74. PubMed ID: 16454310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Perception of coarticulatory information in normal speech and dysarthria.
    Tjaden K; Sussman J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Aug; 49(4):888-902. PubMed ID: 16908883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Human phoneme recognition depending on speech-intrinsic variability.
    Meyer BT; Jürgens T; Wesker T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):3126-41. PubMed ID: 21110608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Training English listeners to perceive phonemic length contrasts in Japanese.
    Tajima K; Kato H; Rothwell A; Akahane-Yamada R; Munhall KG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):397-413. PubMed ID: 18177169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Divide and conquer: How perceptual contrast sensitivity and perceptual learning cooperate in reducing input variation in speech perception.
    Sjerps MJ; Reinisch E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Jun; 41(3):710-22. PubMed ID: 25798784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Differential effects of speaker and vowel variability on fricative perception.
    Johnson K
    Lang Speech; 1991; 34 ( Pt 3)():265-79. PubMed ID: 1843527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The role of variation in the perception of accented speech.
    Sumner M
    Cognition; 2011 Apr; 119(1):131-6. PubMed ID: 21144500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reduction of non-native accents through statistical parametric articulatory synthesis.
    Aryal S; Gutierrez-Osuna R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jan; 137(1):433-46. PubMed ID: 25618072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.