These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17804257)

  • 21. Feature-based activation and suppression during binocular rivalry.
    Vergeer M; van Lier R
    Vision Res; 2010 Apr; 50(8):743-9. PubMed ID: 20102726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An integrative model of binocular vision: a stereo model utilizing interocularly unpaired points produces both depth and binocular rivalry.
    Hayashi R; Maeda T; Shimojo S; Tachi S
    Vision Res; 2004; 44(20):2367-80. PubMed ID: 15246753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A bias for looming stimuli to predominate in binocular rivalry.
    Parker A; Alais D
    Vision Res; 2007 Sep; 47(20):2661-74. PubMed ID: 17707453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Development of rivalry and dichoptic masking in human infants.
    Brown RJ; Candy TR; Norcia AM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Dec; 40(13):3324-33. PubMed ID: 10586959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Minimal physiological conditions for binocular rivalry and rivalry memory.
    Wilson HR
    Vision Res; 2007 Sep; 47(21):2741-50. PubMed ID: 17764714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Object-based attention determines dominance in binocular rivalry.
    Mitchell JF; Stoner GR; Reynolds JH
    Nature; 2004 May; 429(6990):410-3. PubMed ID: 15164062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Single units and conscious vision.
    Logothetis NK
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1998 Nov; 353(1377):1801-18. PubMed ID: 9854253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Surface organization influences bistable vision.
    Graf EW; Adams WJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):502-8. PubMed ID: 18377185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Right parietal TMS shortens dominance durations in binocular rivalry.
    Carmel D; Walsh V; Lavie N; Rees G
    Curr Biol; 2010 Sep; 20(18):R799-800. PubMed ID: 20869603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Quantum formalism to describe binocular rivalry.
    Manousakis E
    Biosystems; 2009 Nov; 98(2):57-66. PubMed ID: 19520143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Binocular rivalry in migraine.
    Wilkinson F; Karanovic O; Wilson HR
    Cephalalgia; 2008 Dec; 28(12):1327-38. PubMed ID: 18798842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. What is rivalling during binocular rivalry?
    Logothetis NK; Leopold DA; Sheinberg DL
    Nature; 1996 Apr; 380(6575):621-4. PubMed ID: 8602261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Perceptual grouping of biological motion promotes binocular rivalry.
    Watson TL; Pearson J; Clifford CW
    Curr Biol; 2004 Sep; 14(18):1670-4. PubMed ID: 15380070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Binocular rivalry reveals a dissociation between the subjective experience and induced gamma oscillations.
    Fairhall SL; Hamm JP; Kirk IJ
    Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Jan; 27(1):213-6. PubMed ID: 18184322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Hysteresis effects in stereopsis and binocular rivalry.
    Buckthought A; Kim J; Wilson HR
    Vision Res; 2008 Mar; 48(6):819-30. PubMed ID: 18234273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Binocular rivalry: spreading dominance through complex images.
    Arnold DH; James B; Roseboom W
    J Vis; 2009 Dec; 9(13):4.1-9. PubMed ID: 20055537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Grouping and segmentation in binocular rivalry.
    Silver MA; Logothetis NK
    Vision Res; 2004; 44(14):1675-92. PubMed ID: 15136003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The interaction between binocular rivalry and negative afterimages.
    Gilroy LA; Blake R
    Curr Biol; 2005 Oct; 15(19):1740-4. PubMed ID: 16213820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of a disparity pattern on the perception of direction: non-retinal information masks retinal information.
    Ishii M
    Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(12):1563-8. PubMed ID: 19324065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on visual rivalry.
    Pearson J; Tadin D; Blake R
    J Vis; 2007 May; 7(7):2.1-11. PubMed ID: 17685798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.